I'm not any of the anons you're responding to, and I haven't really been following the thread, but I have to ask: what exactly do you think you're accomplishing by writing this way? You demand that others cite sources to back up numbers they throw out, but then you turn around and throw out numbers without citing any sources of your own. You accuse others of failing to make proper arguments, yet most of your posts consist of baseless ad-hominems and incoherent ranting. I've seen your posts all over the place around here, and you're consistently one of the most incoherent and obnoxious posters we have.
This poster made a well-reasoned point and backed it up with data. You respond by insinuating that he is a Jew, apparently on the grounds that a) he only made one post in the thread, and b) he disagreed with you. You then proceed to call him out for not providing sources for the numbers he threw out, yet immediately afterward you throw out several numbers of your own, for which you provide no sources.>>318842
You called this poster a "goyjew neo-boomer", whatever the fuck that is supposed to mean exactly. I'm not even going to touch the rest of the gibberish you wrote.>>318888
This poster was not making, or attempting to make, an argument; he was simply pointing out that the post he was responding to opened up a completely new line of discussion. You respond by calling him a pigfucker, accuse him of not making an argument (which he was not doing or pretending to do), and then accuse him of not providing evidence for the argument that you claim he wasn't making. Also:>"HURRDEDURR I'Z A GOYJEW DAT DUZ NUFFIN BUT PARROT DURR RABBIZ WURDZ SO I'Z DA GOODEST GOYJEW".
Who are these "goyjews" you keep bringing up? I must confess I've never heard of them. In any case, the term seems a little oxymoronic.>>318910
This particular anon was not making, or attempting to make, any arguments either. You call him a "goyjew", point out that yes, he was not making any argument, and then suggest that he should perform fellatio on a pig.>>318933
Here, you seem to be insinuating that Palestine was taken by "britmutts" funded by "goyjews" funded by Rabbis, apparently to create some kind of "ethno-reeelijus state." You also state that this action was illegal, though you don't clarify which laws were broken or who made them. As ever, you present no evidence of any of these claims, yet accuse the poster you're responding to of not supplying evidence for any of his
claims. You top this off by suggesting that he bathe in pig semen.>>318956
Your reply to this post is my personal favorite:>Yeah, this goyjew is nothing more than a basic pigfucked niggermutt.
Again with the "goyjews." You're going to have to explain this term to me; it sounds like there are a lot of these people running around, and I'm getting a little concerned. Are they similar to glimmerniggers? Also, how exactly does a basic pigfucked niggermutt differ from the more complex variety of pigfucked niggermutt?>He can't acknowledge shit without emotionally screeching propaganda.
Pot and the kettle, my friend. Pot and the kettle.
Seriously, though, why do you do this? As I've said, you post like this all over the site. Why? Why take time out of your day to type up all of this verbal diarrhea? Who is it written for? Most of the posters you're replying to here weren't even responding to you in the first place, ffs. Why not take the time and energy you invest into ranting about "goyjews" and direct it towards learning to carry on a civilized conversation in coherent English? Or, if you can't manage that, why not just shut the fuck up?