/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>Female UPenn swimmers demoralized: ‘No matter how much work they put in it, they’re going to lose’
>Two female University of Pennsylvania swimmers have recently voiced their frustrations to OutKick regarding their teammate, transgender Penn swimmer Lia Thomas, who is smashing collegiate records previously set by biological females in the sport.
https://www.thecollegefix.com/female-upenn-swimmers-demoralized-no-matter-how-much-work-they-put-in-it-theyre-going-to-lose/
B-but, equality. /s

>>323083
By "White," the Facebook Boomer is talking about White Americans. You know, the ethnogeneis of whatever "free White persons of good character" decided to show up in the US. You're obfuscating his point.

Furthermore, allegiances change. France and England were bitter rivals from 1066 until the Entente signed to resist the Second Reich. Asking an Irishman to bury his (very real and valid) hatchet against the sub-humans known as the English in order to unite in the face of a common foe (anti-Whites) is a tale as old as time.

What we are witnessing in this epoch of history is the beginnings of a wider White racial consciousness for the exact same reason why White Americans began to ethnogenizie in the first place: in defense against a non-White foe. This is happening due to globalization and its impact on the interconnectedness of the world. The more we communicate and interact with one anther, the more our differences come into sharper focus, and the more conflict arises as a result. A quick aside, do I speak of all non-Whites when I say "ani-White?" Not in the slightest. Most non-Whites are not anti-White, but enough non-Whites, and a disturbingly increasing number of Whites, are anti-White.

The causes are, at least, threefold.

The first is that they are numerous and powerful enough to be succeeding in their goals of hurting White people. They are only getting more and more powerful too.

The second is that their grounds are bullshit. Every complaint about Whites that these people have can be thrown back in their faces. Conquest, genocide, imperialism, exploitation, slavery, everything they complain about White people doing, non-Whites have also done. Literally everything. They just don't care due to their moral relativism.

The third is that they are the cause of their concerns. Think, if you believed that your neighbor was a bloodthirsty killer who hated you and wanted you dead, would you insist upon living in his house? That would be absolutely insane. You would think that you would avoid your neighbor as much as possible, right? Is that what they do here? Not in the slightest. They INSIST upon living among people that they make to pretense to not despising. They do this out of their hatred of White people. In accordance with the commandments of the Lord my God, I have already forgiven them. That said, I shall resist them with all I can do until either I shed this mortal coil or they lay down their arms and leave in peace forever for they are evil moral relativists and I am not.

Will this new, larger, pan-White racial consciousness result in ethnogenesis of a singular "White culture?" No, for the goal of the pro-Whites is the exact opposite: the preservation of the various White culture to which they belong. What I expect to see is an informal coalition of pro-Whites each fostering their own cultures and supporting their fellow pro-Whites in their endeavors. This is a good thing. Man is a tribal animal and White people have the right to their own cultures and spaces to the exclusion of others. Discrimination is a good thing. Not everyone belongs everywhere and at times the only way to avoid conflict is through separation. How is it a good idea to force yourself onto people who do not want you there? Unless these are people under your legitimate authority, this typically goes rather poorly.

Also, answer >>323086

>>329338
>evil moral relativists
this has nothing to do with their behavior. and in fact, understanding moral reletavism is how I learned to defeat them in the first place. Moral objectivism is incompatible with your views to begin with. Under a moral objectivist framework, such hatchet burrying should never take place, because the individual would be siding with a true enemy of their flesh. it is the sheep allying with the wolf to defeat another wolf. Only through moral relativism can you get a true understanding and accurate picture of the real relationships between these groups. Can understand that the wolf can be a sheep and vice versa at the same time, depending upon reference. Just like, depending upon your viewing angle, color, shape, and character may change.

To put it into even simpler terms, lets use your erronious view of objective truth as an example. Objective truth requires all understandings, all angles, all possible interpretations and vectors. Attempting to calculate it without all of those measures is mostly pointless, and attempting to be conveyed the objective truth and then acting as though you possessed it is similarly foolish. In this model, Objective truth is like a 3d object existing in flat land. At no point can it intersect with reality as we know it completely. Any truth imposed upon the world will only be a flat truth, a cross section of what is possible given various circumstances.

Understanding moral relevetism is essential to moral character because it highlights human fallibility as the ultimate stumbling block towards the truth in all fields. Without that you are as vulnerable to deception as your enemies, who believe just as strongly that handing their children over to moloch is the ultimate objective good.

>>329347
>Under a moral objectivist framework, such hatchet burrying should never take place, because the individual would be siding with a true enemy of their flesh.
They're not enemies anymore if they stop fighting. Do you have any idea how many wars there were between the Seven Kingdoms of the Anglo-Saxon Heptarchy, or how many White-on-White race riots America had in the Gilded Age? Then ethnogenesis happened.
>Objective truth requires all understandings, all angles, all possible interpretations and vectors.
No wonder you're a moral relativist. You failed to accomplish this.
>Attempting to calculate it without all of those measures is mostly pointless, and attempting to be conveyed the objective truth and then acting as though you possessed it is similarly foolish.
So find them all, duh.
>Understanding moral relevetism is essential to moral character because it highlights human fallibility as the ultimate stumbling block towards the truth in all fields.
And moral objectivity is incompatible with acknowledging that human fallibility is, as you say, "the ultimate stumbling block towards the truth in all fields?"
>Without that you are as vulnerable to deception as your enemies, who believe just as strongly that handing their children over to moloch is the ultimate objective good.
Not if you're an adult who approaches the issue from all angles.

>>329338
Read: Prolonging the Agony by Jim MacGregor and Gerry Docherty. While the authors did grow up in post-boomer lala land where jews are 'muh heroez' and 'durr ebil notsees' are mentioned several times, they provide numerous contextual clues as to why, and how, most huwhites are gullible braindead sheep. Hint: there's a LOT of Anglo.. but virtually no Saxon.

Russia Today (RT) has put together a two-minute clip mocking everything that the American left has become with a "Christmas Tolerance-Diversity Guide 2022," which trolls the US with everything from feminized cuckold husbands to transgender snowmen, to culturally appropriating a reindeer.

>>329920
No, you see, this is not actually a "Libtard Logic Inconsistency."

You need to understand that these people do not share your value system. You care for truth and logic, consistency, free Speech. You are trying to identify the Truth and then apply it to make the world a better place.

That's not their goal. They don't care for any of that. They simply want power and control. They're bullies you see, and they will adhere to any ideology that allows them to satisfy their need to bend people to their will. You said something that offends the LGBT Mafia? You're life is to be destroyed. They care not for free speech but for the enforcement of their values onto others.

This is also why Leftoids in general absolutely despise America so God damned much. America stands for two things which stand in irreconcilable opposition to them: Natural Law and Defiance.

Natural Law is the belief that the Universe operates by certain, unchanging principles. The metaphysics of Mother Nature have not changed since Creation, and were Created by the Creator (who is who/whatever you so choose to believe in.) Man is greedy. Power corrupts. From Death comes Life. Male and Female. Diversity plus proximity equals conflict. These Truths were not the creations of Man, but of Nature and Nature's God. We lowly mortals can do nothing to change them. We can only shape the world in which we live within the confines of those Truths. Leftist ideology stands opposed to this. According to Leftist ideology, men can be come women, diversity is a good thing, and other self evident Lies. This creates two camps of Leftoids. The first camp is the Idiots, the True Believers. The second camp are the Bullies, the Evil. This is why there are always purges when Leftists seize absolute power. The Bullies have to get rid of the Idiots because the Idiots are good natured people who would become a serious threat to the Bullies' power once they realized they were lied to.

We Americans routinely struggle to live up to our ideal of Defiance but our country is still a symbol of Defiance in the face of Bullshit. This country was founded as part of an initially peaceful attempt to Redress legitimate Grievances that turned violence once all other options failed. The spirit of this still lives. You see the attached photograph? Those are Michiganders standing in front of their Governor's Office. Armed. This was done in response to Her Majesty the Queen Gretchen I of House Witmer's Coronatarianism. Name me one other country where such a scene would be imaginable. Lefties are terrified of what the American People would do to them if we uncucked ourselves. That is why they put so much effort towards either destroying or seizing control of the United States and why we MUST win.

>>329959
>They simply want power and control. They're bullies you see, and they will adhere to any ideology that allows them to satisfy their need to bend people to their will.
This.

>>331090
This kind of thing annoys the shit out of me for two reasons: first because "Satanists" in 2022 are basically just fedora-tipping Redditors attempting to troll boomer Christians, and second because Christians always, always end up taking the bait in exactly the way they were meant to, like Charlie Brown running after Lucyfer's football. The problem stems from Christians not understanding what "Satanism" really is.

There are basically two writers credited with being the progenitors of modern Satanism: Aleister Crowley and Anton LaVey. Crowley was basically a Hermetic magician who gained notoriety for referring to himself as "the great beast 666" and for his polemic attacks on Christianity. The magical order he founded and his religion of Thelema was largely just a modification of the rituals and doctrines of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, and had basically nothing to do with Satan or any other Christian mythological figures. In my view Crowley was fairly based; he had an extensive working knowledge of High Magick and was respected by a lot of important figures on the fringe right, most notably Julius Evola. However, these days, most people of a Crowleyan bent grow out of being Satanists and move on to more serious traditions around the time they sprout their first pubes, so there aren't very many Crowleyan Satanists around anymore.

The more significant figure for our purposes is Anton Szandor LaVey, who wrote the "Satanic Bible" and founded the official Church of Satan in the late 1960s. The main difference between these two is that while Crowley was a serious spiritualist who used provocative Satanic imagery to troll people, with LaVey it was literally all imagery and trolling. LaVey was a rational materialist who viewed magic and religion as psychological flim-flam that only had value insofar as it could be used to manipulate people. Out of curiosity I recently bought a copy of The Satanic Bible, and I've been mostly disappointed by it so far; it's basically just Atlas Shrugged for goth kids. LaVey's "religion" is just a philosophy of radical individualism and social Darwinism. It rejects all forms of religious and social authority, and advocates individuals using whatever means are at their disposal to achieve whatever material ends they desire, without regard for morality or social norms. People seriously interested in this sort of thing would be better served reading Max Stirner imo; he's considerably more articulate, and in terms of his actual beliefs is probably more extreme.

The main takeaway from LaVeyan Satanism is that it's not a religion in any proper sense at all, and this is important because the overwhelming majority of people who proclaim themselves as Satanists these days are talking about LaVeyan Satanism. Satanism has absolutely nothing to do with worshipping an actual Devil; if you ask a Satanist about their beliefs, the first thing they will generally tell you is that they don't actually believe in God or Satan. Once you subtract the theatrics, modern Satanism is basically just Secular Humanism with the Humanist component (usually) removed. This is an important distinction if you want to understand what "The After-School Satan Club" is really trying to accomplish.

Let's take a look at what the club's organizers actually have to say:
>This actually isn't a club that's meant to proselytize Satanism or even engage in discussions about religious opinion
>This is an educational program meant to focus on critical thinking and just basic education skills.

My guess would be that if you were to attend an actual meeting of this club, it would be a fairly innocuous and inoffensive gathering. The meetings probably involve simple lessons about logic and critical thinking, and that's about it. I assume that the guy is not lying when he says that religious topics are not discussed, because that's the whole point. It would be accurate to call this subversive, but the manner of subversion is more subtle than it appears to be.

Instead of deliberately provoking people with something they could reasonably object to, they take something that most people wouldn't object to, but attach a lot of edgelord devil-worshipper imagery to it as a way to specifically provoke Christians. Then, when they have everyone's attention, they can explain that their club is basically just an afterschool debate club, and it's really not that big a deal. It's a completely passive-aggressive subversion tactic that LaVey would have loved: create something innocuous, provoke a group of religious conservatives into overreacting to it, and then use their overreaction to discredit them.

From the editorial response at the bottom of this article, we can see that the subversion tactic worked, and that the idiots have once again taken the goddamned bait:
>Satan is after our children. Pray for this nation.

The key thing to understand is that the "Satanic Temple" doesn't give two shits if their afterschool club gets dissolved or not. The object is not to convert children into devil-worshippers or even to teach them "critical thinking skills", the object is to provoke Bible-thumping retards into getting mad about something silly, as part of a long-game campaign to discredit organized religion in the public view. They've mostly been successful.

Instead of freaking out about "muh devil-worshipper cult," a better reaction to this sort of thing would be to point out how empty and stupid it is. "Satanists" are really just emotionally-stunted atheists still wearing edgy Pentagram jewelry into their thirties and forties, because they never outgrew their whiny teenage feud with their parents' religion. They deserve to be laughed at, not feared, and deep down that's probably what they're most afraid of. Ironically, attacking weak, pathetic people by punching them right where it hurts is also something LaVey would have approved of.

>>331478
Okay Styx

Just kidding, after my IRL experience with some of these doods, it eventually became apparent they were just a bunch of larpers.

Besides that, i think even the most ardent Christian here will agree that it is tiresome to deal with the average Christian for one or another reason.

>>331478
Thank you. Not a satanist in any context, but I appreciate the fair and unbiased assessment of what contemporary 'satanism' is, and not exclusively because I agree with that assessment. Zero contest

>>331481
>Okay Styx
Ooh, so close :^)

>>331488
Nope, that was me

fuck, i screwed up a cross-board reference again

>>331484
Assuming you are the same anon posting about satanism on /sp/ two weeks ago. >>>/sp/18885 →
Just wanna point out that i am not refering to Stix the admin, i am refering to "styxhexenhammer666" the gaytuber, Nicholas Fuentes fags usually call anyone talking about satanism as "Styx".

I don't discard the idea that somebody doesn't know about that fag, nothing wrong with not knowing about an e-celeb.

>>331490
and forgot to hide my flag...

Kid tells livestream that his mom is forcing him to be gay.

>>332001
KEK

>>325011
Yes.

>ALERT: 37,000 Teachers Use Left-Wing 'News Literacy Project' to Indoctrinate Children (Videos)
>The News Literacy Program warns that “common misinformation themes” include phrases such as “[T]he media won’t report this” and “[D]o your own research”.
>The News Literacy Project (NLP) is a propaganda outlet masquerading as “non-partisan.” The dangerous organization teaches school children how to be mindless leftist narrative consumers.
>Left-wing commentator and notorious fake news purveyor Brian Stelter of CNN’s deceptively named “Reliable Sources” was featured last week teaching young teens about “misinformation” in Queens, New York. During the segment, students are indoctrinated by the NLP’s Checkology e-learning platform. Stelter said that NLP founder Alan C. Miller “says that these lessons are now used by more than 37,000 educators.”
https://rairfoundation.com/alert-37000-teachers-use-left-wing-news-literacy-project-to-indoctrinate-children-videos/
Videos:
>Promo Video for 'News Literacy Project'
https://rumble.com/vtvfo9-promo-video-for-news-literacy-project.html
>'News Literacy Project' Featured on Local News in Tucson to Teach 'Misinformation'
https://rumble.com/vtveys-new-literacy-project-featured-on-local-news-in-tucson-to-teach-misinformati.html
>CNN's Brian Stelter Teaches Teens About 'Misinformation' for Leftist 'News Literacy Project'
https://rumble.com/vtmzah-cnns-brian-stelter-teaches-teens-about-misinformation-for-leftist-news-lite.html

>>333822
What The Fuck? I Love China Now!

>>333822
>>333823
Does anyone have that tweet where a Chinese official made some remark that low birth rates don't explain the Uyghur genocide, and if they did, then what about White birth rates in America?

>>333826
Nope, i know the one you are talking about though. had it on my old pc.

>>333826
I have this.

>>333829
It should be pretty clear by now that the chinks are engaged in a standoff with the kikes

>>333832
It looks like.
The kike zionist faction with Trump at the helm bashed China non-stop.
Now the kike bolshevik faction with Soros as the figure head is calling for sanctions against China.

>>333829
That's it. Thanks, anon.

>>333834
But it appears that the NATO countries went sour with China when the WEF representative in China and super billionaire Jack Ma was put under house arrest and disappeared from public view by the chinese president. That chink Jack Ma looks like he was negotiating China entrance into the NWO behind the back of the chinese government and was punished because of that. Now it is the actual chinese government who is negotiating with Klaus Schwab the enslavement of the chinese population to the NWO. Same treason, different actors.
Pic is Jack Ma at the WEF.

It's weird to see China doing the odd good thing here. I'm thinking that this might be a kind of "werewolf vs vampire" situation where it's bad for us no matter who wins the confrontation, but I'm willing to accept the help in the short term.

Why might the Chinese be willing to come into conflict with the globalists? The whole reason West Taiwan was able to oust the legitimate Chinese government was due to organization and incitement by Jewish Marxist trainers. They also seem to have them to thank for most of their economic and infrastructure development over the years. Basically, without Marxist globalist support, I'm not sure China can really stand on its own.

>>333854
>Why might the Chinese be willing to come into conflict with the globalists?
They never were. When (((Henry Kissinger))) went to China in the 70s to offer the chinese investment and the transfer of the western industrial capacity, the demise of the West was only a matter of time. And that policy wasn't a mistake, but on purpose.
The current beef with China is about some (((western oligarchs))) demanding that the chinese oligarchs to cede some control and therefore profits to (((them))), but the chinese are having none of that non-sense and are dealing directly with the WEF and ignoring the American screeching.

>>334400
Tbh, this is moreso targetted marketting that racial propaganda. A lot of niggers watch the superbowl, and niggers are moreeasily controlled by what they see other niggers do on TV, so companis pander to them.

>Preferred Pronoun
A clip from:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaRnAR0dlw

>>335817
Moar:

>*UPDATED: TEACHER RESIGNS — VIDEO: Texas Middle School Teacher: "Those Conservative Christians Need to Get COVID and Die"
>Colleyville ISD teacher recorded railing against opposition to COVID vaccines
https://danaloesch.substack.com/p/video-texas-middle-school-teacher

>>337584
>Nigger faggot hates White people
Imagine my shock

>>337588
Yeah, but I can imagine what was going on there. That affirmative action faggot by blocking the promotions of some Whites got in the way of the freemason mafia.

>>301871
what book or speech did Max Horkheimer say that quote in? I've done several searches for it and all I can find are articles quoting it without context and quote aggregators. I've ctrl-f'd for related keywords in a couple of his books, neither of them has it, I might keep looking in the others if I can get digital copies (I'm not going to read an entire paperback just to find this quote)
also, if you have a source for their program, in the 5th image, I'd love to have it. some of it is easily extrapolated from what I know of frankfurt theory, but I don't know anywhere where they're all explicitly stated.

Pete Buttigieg’s """Husband""" Chasten Leads Children in LGBT Pervert Pledge to Rainbow Flag
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1501747042955272196

>>323086
it depends on the country. yes for eastern europe, central europe, scandinavia, all the german-speaking countries, all the mediterranean countries, yes for france, belgium, the netherlands, australia, canada and new zealand, and of course yes for the united states. yes for ireland, scotland, wales and cornwall. but no, not ever, for England.
>>329338
>the beginnings of a wider White racial consciousness
fine, so long as it excludes the English.
>Every complaint about Whites that these people have can be thrown back in their faces.
it could be much more easily done if you simply excluded the English. we did everything that the rest of you did that was bad, but more than anybody else has ever done.
>The third is that they are the cause of their concerns. Think, if you believed that your neighbor was a bloodthirsty killer who hated you and wanted you dead, would you insist upon living in his house?
if I was born in that house, yes. and a lot of these immigrants were born in the metaphorical house.
but more importantly, if that house were England and I were a foreigner who had, in ages past, been treated so brutally by her empire, then I would move into that house in order to kill the killer, and personally I'm very much in favour of that.
>>324952
>Why are bongistanis, the kikes Europe, so whiny?
Because they are racially inferior and should be exterminated.
>You and I aren't enemies and you'd realize that if you weren't retarded.
oh but we are, we wonderfully, gloriously are. you broke free of our tyrannical yoke, and in return for your earnest desire for freedom and liberty, we burned down your white house. return the favour. nuke london. nuke it, do it - America has the strength, America has the will, destroy England, kill every last English scum, eliminate it all, wipe it from the face of the planet. we have been enemies since 1776 and we always will be, it's England's best hope of being utterly destroyed. burn us to the ground.

>>337879
Anon, are you the "kike" from way earlier in this same bread?, what happened?
Not trying to be aggressive or anything, am just curious.
If you are indeed the same anon, you will remember how i was rather receptive of what you had to say anyways

>>337906
>Anon, are you the "kike" from way earlier in this same bread?, what happened?
yeah
I was here before that too, posting again in a different style
I change my mind a lot, it's because I spend almost all of my time alone, so I argue most with myself.
>Not trying to be aggressive or anything, am just curious.
I don't mind aggression sometimes. I appreciate that you're not being aggressive, but sometimes getting attacked or hated makes me feel most alive, that's why in this particular instance I pretended to be jewish
ok well
quarter israeli. to properly explain, my grandfather was the son of a christian missionary in what was then the British Mandate of Transjordan, and since he was born in Jerusalem, when he travelled back there in the 60s, the Israeli police actually noticed he was born there and told him they could give him Israeli citizenship if he wanted, but I think he would have had to renounce British citizenship.
also my great-great grandmother was raped by an unknown man and that side of the family has slightly darker skin, so I'm partially nonwhite either way.
>If you are indeed the same anon, you will remember how i was rather receptive of what you had to say anyways
I kind of forget, I reread the thread a bit ago but my brain doesn't retain things well. if it was the agreeing with whites being allowed to have their own exclusive areas with that swedish poster, then I maintain that, I just don't want it for English people, I don't like us.
I'm mainly here again because I seek outlets when my hatred gets really really intense, and in my case I don't hate other races but rather hate my own race, again excluding those belonging to other cultures.

>>337931
I knew you were not a paid glownigger, wish i had more time in my hands, i'll just say for now that you remain an interesting poster, only Sven and i seem to agree on that, i would like to sit down and talk another time if it's possible.

>>338012
sure. if an alternative venue would be more suitable for you than here, where others might interrupt, I'd be down for that. it depends on how you'd want to talk I guess.
I'm between jobs at the moment, so I'm hungry for discussion of all kinds.

>>338032
I'll set up something in a discord-like platform i've heard about recently, i'll let you know when it's done

>>338101
you know matrix is still here...
mlp.chat and matrix.horse

iunno, maybe I shill matrix too much, but it really is the best way to securely communicate between two or more people.
If there is concern about random people joining a public channel, make it private and invite only. All communication is very securely encrypted, and there is another function to encrypt the channel so the data on the server-side is encrypted too. Only people actually in the channel can see what is being said.

>>338104
Oh, thanks anon!, i'll try it out

>>338113
I've joined both those he mentioned as "haruqon", so that's all set up for if you wanna chat

>Putin Delivers Speech on Moral Crisis of Western States.
>He mentions satanism and pedophilia as products of a moral crisis engineered by western governments themselves.
Let us hear what that evil dictator has to say. /s

Not the SHARPEST Tool in the Shed by any means.

>>339201
How Very Anti Semitic

>swollen scwotums uwu
The jews accused the Nazis of using masturbation machines

>>339296
OY VEY
Shlomo they made my balls hurt!

From USA Today:
>Marsha Blackburn asked Ketanji Brown Jackson to define 'woman.' Science says there's no simple answer.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/health-wellness/2022/03/24/marsha-blackburn-asked-ketanji-jackson-define-woman-science/7152439001/
https://archive.ph/YVlt2

>>329338
>>329392
Since you haven't read the book I stated in 329472, I'll amend my statement with this: when the cheesefuckers kneeled and bowed down to vaticuck loving inbreds against actual white men from pre-Germany, REAL MEN, not braindead religiot simps solely due to the efforts of (((NOT ONE OF US, NOT ONE OF US))) sjw-styled propaganda based on the singular dispute of (((DEY DOZENT HAZ OUR REELIIIIJUUUUN)))... it's not cute when you think that you've outsmarted your opponent and will automagically come out on top in a debate. In reality, you've only shown how much of a brainlet goytoy you are.

How many wars did the EIGHT KINGDOMS of Saxons, yes, EIGHT, as in the Wheel of Chaos, have? To answer that question: (((You))) do not care. You offered zero historical context, thus that topic isn't your place to relate to since you are a clearly biased goyboy. Good job outing yourself there. Here's another question: why is there such a TINY confluence of anglo-cuckstains that outbred from their peoples? I mean, the britcucks COULD have outbred... yet they never did. The Hapsburg jaw is a real problem, y'know. Especially when it occurs en masse outside of the Hapsburg family, to an entire (((race))) that were once the bretons, then became the britons. Fucked up jaws? Check. Fucked up teeth? Check. Inbreeding that ran alongside 'both' family 'lines' which ended up >35 congenital genetic diseases for the """modern day briton"""? Triple check. It's a real shitshow when britmutts have 35 known genetic diseases compared the 53+ that kikes have!

Secondary answer: fuck you. You know nothing about the Eight Saxon Families, nor do you know shit about why they slaughtered Saxons that interbred with the britmutts. If you did... then you would understand why those wars took place. So, since I'm being helpful, here's a clue: when three of those families started going soft and married some britniggers right around the time of a certain farmer-turned-jarl-turned-king, the other five got real pissed since they didn't want their lineage to be vaticuck-bootlicking goyim that were certainly to be castrated and sent as sex slaves to various bitchships, vicarls, and (((popes))). I mean, what was the POINT of conquering a land filled with weak, spineless goyim, if not to purge them and be far better suited farmers? The balls aren't in your pants, goyim. And probably never were to begin with.

As for: moral relativism = "morals change over time based upon cumulative knowledge, unbiased aptitudes, meritocracy, and collective cultural experience. It can never be correct, nor (((good))), to call another, separate, group of human that horrible slur of 'inhuman', unless the LABEL FITS THE DESCRIPTED PARTIES. As we all should know by now, there are currently (((three groups))) that must be deemed subhuman."

tl;dr: you wake up in the morning and scream "punch all NAAAAHHHHTZEEEEZ" in the mirror, then go on to post dipshit allegories about (((m-muh beleefs))), but the longer you keep staring... the more you become what you hate. So, keep pocketing those good goy petro-shekels, Mister doublePLUSGOOD nothinker. However, make no mistake: treason is a crime punishable by only one outcome. Now, go read that book I suggested before you become completely cucked.

>>340101
This has to be satire....

>>340173
Prolly, theres a guy who has been going around to school board meeting heavily parodying leftist talking points in as ridiculous a manner as possible, could be him.

>>340185
Hope so, it got kinda funny towards the end.
>>340302
Fox Jews Strikes again.

>>340302
Funny that Tomi Lahren called critics of the troon "a mob uglier than the left" when the left has bombed the white house, treated protestors at the White House worse than ISIS members and thrown some of them into gulags, censored writers and comedians, groomed children and fought for the right to continue grooming children, engaged in terrorist activity against businesses and individuals, and more, all with the consent and support of the state and megacorp-globalist system.
Fuck niggers, fuck troons, fuck compromise.
How did boomers tolerating some niggers and illegal immigrants work out for them?

>>340185
Yes, it is him.

>>340319
>>340101
Is He dare I say..../OurGuy/?

>>340345
Multiple levels of irony, politically incorrect, larping as the other side: That's /pol/ alright.

>>340302
non-metaphorically this here stonetoss

Communism only works in an infallible world. Unfortunately we live in a fallible world where someone will take advantage of the system. It will never ever work. Karl Marx never worked a day in a life in a factory. I worked at FedEx as someone who loaded the trailers and knows what a hard days work is. I can't believe lazy idiots believe in Karl Marx ideas at all. Also it doesn't help we are current's in an economic Neo-feudalistic society

>Disney
https://www.thedisneydetails.com/target-now-offers-100-disney-gift-cards/
When You Open Your Eyes And See What's In Plain Sight.
It appears these cards came out around 2016 based on an image search.

>>340387
>Communism only works in an infallible world.
why do you give it that much? why say it doesn't work even in an infallible world? if you say it works in an infallible world, that implies that it very nearly works, and just needs a few capitalistic tweaks. everyone always says that it works "in a perfect world" or "on paper", but does it actually? all communists will hear when you say that is that communism mostly works. the way this common phrase is worded seems to be intended to imply good things about communism, wouldn't you say?

>>340836
Saying that it only works in an infallible world implies that it will never work in a fallible one, no matter how many tweaks you make to it. No more, no less.

>infallibility is 'just a couple tweaks' to Capitalism
Is this a parody?

>>340816
Maybe I'm stupid but what is the significance of this?

>>340873
Fucking lol. I wouldn't have noticed that if I'd stared at it all day.

>Utah "republican" Governor Spencer Cox shares his preferred pronouns with students to teach kids leadership with Equity & Inclusion
https://twitter.com/lifeisdriving/status/1511390828496769028
Video mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApkwwV7JX_E

>>340882
"Act as schizo and moralfaggy as them" doesn't really win out

https://youtu.be/IMJHr_y2WVY
Faggots cannot be trusted around kids

>>340891
Moar:

>Tucker Carlson Tonight 04/06/2022 Opening Monologue
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xxfPQhZ1HUEa/

>>341043
No it isn't, and it's not a sexuality, it's just normal. Girls get periods at 12, historically girls got married at 12-16, the AOC in the US in 1880 was 7-12 by state. Libtarded moralfagging

>>341058
>the AOC in the US in 1880 was 7-12 by state
Yeah, but you forgot to mention that women at that time were property and not a freelance whores as they are today.

>>341058
Cope Harder pedo

>>341076
Why's that related?

>>341091
Angry with no point generally means you're the one coping

⁣Parent starts reading the grooming material her kids' school is teaching, school board member shuts down.

>>341099
The best part is the poor sign language interpretter in the corner who's cringing the whole time as she acts it out.

>>341095
>Why's that related?
It is absolutely much related as involves which roles women will get as functional members of a community.
Either they function as women, or as men. Both roles cannot come together and properly be played.

>>341103
What does that have to do with schizos virtue signalling about wanting to kill pedos? Men are attracted to young girls, that's natural, there's nothing wrong with it, and that's it

>>341104
When women were property, the custody and therefore property, was transferred from the father to the husband, being the last the new tutor and guarantor of that woman safety.
Today the bureaucracy had messed all that and by means of intimidation and violence gives freewill to young women to squander their sexuality around.

>>341106
Okay, I don't really disagree, but you didn't answer how that's related

>>341107
Precisely into restrict women' sexuality towards a productive outcome: to make children and nothing else. For that the patriarchal family institution plays the key role.

>>341076
>women at that time were property
They were not legally property in the 1880's.

>>341111
Not to the extend of animal property, but close enough for guaranteeing that the ladies won't make the wrong personal choices.

>>341113
Yeah, except that's not the same as property. Law had very little to do in that case, as it was really only enforced by social norms.

>>341114
Put it this way: a property with human rights. Like the relation of parents and children.

>>341116
Yeah, although it's still pretty different as far as U.S. law is concerned. Property is a legal term. They even had that SCOTUS ruling that established the legal rammifications of what what kind of rights you have when you're considered property: zero.
It's kind of nitpicky, but "property" is a rather specific term with exact legal implications. What it really was is that women adhered to social tradition, not legal specification, and did what their families expected of them.

>>341117
>SCOTUS
Forget about that, it is a body meant to certificate oligarch policies and only has the legitimacy of the gun on which is backed.
Natural and Common Law is the path.

>>341095
>Y-Y-You're the one coping
I look forward to hanging you.

>>341122
Lmao.
You won't be saying that when you get hanged, pedophile.

>>341122
Yeah. PEDO.

>>341118
Then "property" might not be the best term to use anyway. You're talking about tradition, not law.

>>341126
>You're talking about tradition, not law.
Common Law then.

>>341124
>>341125
You need that final word as le internet tough guy exactly because it's as much of a cope as when a libtard sees crime stats, emotional and boring

I'm right and little girls will always be best

>>341127
By "common law", what do you mean? I understand it as law derivative of judicial precedent.

>>341124
>>341125
>>341121
Learn to stop feeding the trolls.

>>341130
>I'm right and little girls will always be best
Only if property right are restored as before, not before.

>>341134
>>341135
>>341134
All of you need to die. I hate this site now, you faggots killed it.

>>341135
Ye, okay. They actually support each other. Early marriage means, very obviously, sooner (more) kids, less promiscuity and stronger bonding

>>341134
I'm not trolling. Ask me anything and I'll give you a good answer

>>341136

>>341137
Oh No Horse pussy! its not like I've seen it for 5 years straight.

>>341136
Grow some skin. Did you seethe all over the thread when you met obnoxious people on 4chan too?

>>341149
No, I always knew 4cuck was a shithole having grown up on it. but mlpol used to be a community that was based on friendship, this is like niggers moving into your neighborhood and shitting everything up. its no longer the same website from 5 years ago, its changed for the worse.

>>341151
It's not going to get better by engaging faggots whenever they start shitposting. Just hide, ignore and move on.

>>341151
>mlpol used to be a community that was based on friendship
It is, but because you are a spineless faggot you are too sensible to this site.
Derpibooru may cater your sensibilities better.
>>>/derpibooru/

>>341151
So what are you going to do about it? Are you just going to bitch about it, or are you going to make it better?
This site's quality has stagnated because people just sit around and complain about things without posting any actual content. On some months it feels like I'm the only one actually making news threads for weeks, and don't get me started on lack of ponies.

>>341155
Checked and based.

>>342441
I wish there were still /pol/ edits for zyklon ben's boomer art

The lunatics are back.

>>342541
Nah thats the PTA /pol/ troll

>>342645
Better Times
>>342840
>Left
The main stream right is for it too.

Jews

Demonic cunt argues her case to kill a baby.

>>343125
Former abortionist describes performing a second trimester abortion.

>>343125
the pro abortion lobby isnt used to actually arguing their points directly at people that disagree. they survive by means of deception and suppression. because of this they they dont understand their oppositions argument. most of them dont even know why people oppose abortion. so they come up with these counter arguments someone told them, unaware that it has nothing to do with why their opposition disagrees.

One side shouts "abortion is murder" and one side shouts "its a womans right". But both agree women dont have a right to murder. but the argument is never about if abortion is murder or not and it very clearly is.
The easiest argument is to just compare the differences between an abortion and a premature delivery. the baby is removed from the mother in both cases and she's freed from this "burden" even if it means the babies life may end in the process, but the difference is the abortion makes sure the baby doesnt survive. if the baby accidentally survives, they call the abortion "botched".
They could easily just remove the baby without intentionally destroying it.

>>343125
A good 4 decades ago my mum worked in a premature baby unit. If a baby did not cry out for feeding it was deemed o.k. for it to starve to death. Things have moved on but there will always be a line between life and bucket of human remains.

>>343142
>If a baby did not cry out for feeding it was deemed o.k. for it to starve to death.
>women in charge
Think about it, it looks like they are natural born killers. We are lucky our mothers didn't kill us when they could.

Dr Edward Dutton: The Jolly Heretic
>What Kind of People Dye Their Hair Unnatural Colours?
https://odysee.com/@JollyHeretic:d/what-kind-of-people-dye-their-hair:c
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rWfgSMJnpXac/

>>344342
>The slippery slope
Here it is:

>Wisconsin Middle School Students Charged Over Incorrect ‘Pronoun’ Usage
>Three eighth-graders have been slapped with "sexual harassment" charges under Title IX
https://nationalfile.com/wisconsin-middle-school-students-charged-over-incorrect-pronoun-usage/
https://twitter.com/MichaelPreamble/status/1525199706812555264

This man nailed it.

Sean Last refuting the argument that social attitudes are the only reason homosexuals commit suicide at higher rates.

>>344870
>Fagets killing themselves
The talker needs to address how to increase the death rate.