/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


Welcome to the new code.
If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
Note: JS is required to be able to post, but I am working on a system where that won't be needed.

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

map.png
Custom Maps
Anonymous
1dcc790
?
No.279956
283033 284648 286321
If you're lazy like me, mapchart.net is a cool site.
I can already see people asking about this map, so just to get it out of the way quickly - it's mostly for fun, Finland is obviously a meme, German Scotland comes from historical Nordic claims to that area, Brazil historically was a segregationist slave state, the Golden Circle was a proposed expansion of American Slave States (AKA Greater CSA), New Germany if any of you aren't aware is a genuine plan amongst some /pol/acks, and finally the Neo-Ummayads are mainly about how if you lumped all the Muslims into one, massive, unstable Caliphate, they'd be too busy fighting against the Caliphate and one another to engage in terrorism, and the administration of such a massive and internally conflicted empire would have to be friendly to neighbours so they can help put down civil wars.
Anyways, post your custom maps!
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.280077
280199
ideal world.png
Rate my future concept
white nationalists take over America and conquer 99% of the world with it while the redpilled Japanese take over their land and fuck China up for us.
Both countries focus on space mining and space colonization so there's not much reason to bother each other
Nepal gets to exist independently because I like their flag.
Anonymous
1dcc790
?
No.280199
280239
>>280077
It's alright, though I much prefer Kai Murros's, which is similar and more detailed. Pretty much my only criticisms are somewhat pointless European colonization where there's not much point doing so, since they wouldn't have much valuable land worth settling - central asia and central arabia in particular on your map. Central asia, being mostly arid flatlands, can only really support herding, so there's very little reason to control them - Russia did so to consolidate their borders, and the Soviet Union merely continued in the Tsarist vein. As for Arabia, it's all sand. The sahara can be terraformed with much effort, but an area like Arabia is more mountainous than the Sahara, not to mention smaller. So I don't really see the problem letting steppe and desert nomads do their thing.
BTW I notice you used just country view on mapchart, you can also use detailed, which lets you color by province, and you can select multiple countries by abbreviation if you want to color a bunch at once.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.280239
280244
>>280199
It's never pointless to solve potential problems before they arise.
If whites have control of the deserts, sandniggers can't breed in them.
Anonymous
1dcc790
?
No.280244
280696
>>280239
http://kaimurros.blogspot.com/2013/04/a-federal-constitution-for-greater.html
here's some of Professor Kai Murros's maps. as for the thing about terrorists breeding, no worries, the violent sandniggers come from urban or settled populations primarily, by ensuring they remain nomadic we take away their ability to attack us, as they need to spend most of their time herding in order to eat without food being transported to their ports and if we bomb irrigation and agricultural infrastructure. Then just make sure as little tech as possible leaks through to them and you've got a force that threatens nobody, they'd be a threat to the Saudis currently if they would ever be a threat. Also to your point about breeding - look at everything between afghanistan and kazakhstan, including afghanistan and pakistan - all of those countries have a collective population of 40 million (equivalent to the population of england, not including scotland wales ireland or overseas territories). That's pathetic, we'd have no problem wiping them out - point being, they have low populations naturally due to being nomadic.
Anonymous
08eee67
?
No.280314
280457 280697
map.png
This took way longer than I expected. It's not really based on anything in particular; I just sort of let my autism run wild.
Anonymous
1dcc790
?
No.280457
281104
>>280314
it's a great map! saved - really, really, really not a fan of "greater britannia" though. need to free the scots, welsh and irish from the jews, after all.
Anonymous
450239d
?
No.280692
280697
9eomu0u5ijv01.png
>The Golden Circle
>Not The Great Empire of Long Florida
>Fucking Unholy Non-Longist Fags
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.280696
280766
>>280244
True, but imagine what good that land could do for whites.
Oil is there, I hear. And the sunlight would make it a great spot for solar power plants.
Then again the only people I've ever known who liked solar panels were leftists. Are solar panels secretly shit?
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.280697
281104
>>280314
What's up with the "Bhantu wilderness"? Why is it so black and not Free Afrikaaner property?
>>280692
Where do you find these maps?
Anonymous
1dcc790
?
No.280766
>>280696
>True, but imagine what good that land could do for whites.
Nobody wants to live in the desert.
>Oil is there, I hear.
Pipelines. They're not too hard to defend, either.
>And the sunlight would make it a great spot for solar power plants.
In this example it'd be better to just have a different government there for us to deal with, a puppet state that maintains solar power plants and oil refineries. Conquest at that stage would just be a waste of resources.
>Then again the only people I've ever known who liked solar panels were leftists. Are solar panels secretly shit?
Leftists are also partial to breathing, but you wouldn't discount that as a result. Solar panels have issues, but ultimately the judge of whether in a given context they are worth it is whether it breaks even or not, that is the profit of energy farmed is greater than the cost of putting it up. From an environmentalist point of view, a Leftist simply wouldn't care about the cost, only the ideological benefit.
Anonymous
08eee67
?
No.281104
281398 281966
>>280457
Not really a brit so I can't say for sure, but looking at brit history gives me the impression that insulars gonna insular. They might hate each other at times, but it seems like they typically band together willingly against the dirty continental hordes.
**Besides, there are no jews left in this world.**
>>280697
The Bantu Wilderness is an internationally-operated nature preserve for endangered species. Humans can pay great amounts for armored-car safaris and hunting trips to observe the wildlife in its natural habitat, but for the most part humans stay out, so majestic species like elephants and gorillas are making a real comeback.
But niggers, for some reason, just keep getting more and more endangered there.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.281398
>>281104
That would be a fitting hell for the jungle-dwellers. But what if they start damaging the local environment?
Anonymous
1dcc790
?
No.281966
281979
>>281104
>but looking at brit history gives me the impression that insulars gonna insular. They might hate each other at times
while it's true that there's no genetic difference between the groups, being a nationalist I believe national borders ought to correspond to particular cultures and languages - after all, the sort of """British Nationalist""" morons who claim nationalism derives only from genetics forget to mention the distinct lack of genetic difference between the British peoples and the French, yet they don't seem particularly keen to unite with them. Bottom line is that the Irish, Welsh and Scots are their own peoples, and each have their own dialect of Gaelic, and similarly England is English, we speak English, and our tax money shouldn't be spent mostly propping up the Celtic countries economies: they ought to stand on their own, just as they wish to, and save us a great deal of difficulty and money in the process. It is only right that England be governed for the English for the first time in 400 years, no longer should Celts and Immigrants, Brits but not English, be prioritized over us.
>They might hate each other at times, but it seems like they typically band together willingly against the dirty continental hordes.
This is pretty much the opposite of what happened - see the Auld Alliance for example, where the Scots agreed with the "continental hordes" (i.e the French) that if one of them went to war with England, the other would join them. Now a few of these """British Nationalists""" also deny the historical event of the Saxon migration that took place between the 4th and 8th centuries, at first replacing Britonnic populations (in culture most similar to the modern welsh), and over time of course the genetics became homogenous, yet they will argue that the term we use to describe this group of Germanic tribes, that is Anglo-Saxon, is actually a term made up to divide the Germanic peoples, which is about as viable as claiming that the existence of Austrian, Dutch, Belgian, Danish, Swedish and Norwegian identity was just a plot to divide the Germanic peoples, that is that it's predicated entirely on genetics and not at all on culture. I'm not opposed to the idea of a unified white state but it's simply idiocy to claim that all the differences between Europeans were invented by Jews. So the Welsh were conquered early on and fought tooth and nail against the English for their entire history, the Irish were too disunified to appeal to Europe, but the Scots certainly worked with Europe and nationalists worked with European regimes later in history as well, for example the friendship between Irish nationalists and European countries that wanted to take Britain down a notch during the world wars. The most unified the peoples of Britain have ever been is in the United States, where they took on an entirely different culture and identity in any case.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.281979
Britain and Ireland.gif
Towns and Villages.jpg
Myths of the British isles.jpg
>>281966
while it's true that there's no genetic difference between the groups, being a nationalist I believe national borders ought to correspond to particular cultures and languages - after all, the sort of """British Nationalist""" morons who claim nationalism derives only from genetics forget to mention the distinct lack of genetic difference between the British peoples and the French, yet they don't seem particularly keen to unite with them. Bottom line is that the Irish, Welsh and Scots are their own peoples, and each have their own dialect of Gaelic, and similarly England is English, we speak English, and our tax money shouldn't be spent mostly propping up the Celtic countries economies
Depends on where you are, the Shetland folk are of both Scottish and Norse descent and the Isles are of almost true Gael/Pict blood.
Each part of the united Jewdom should have it's own currency as well as the old languages should be restored to give a true distinction between the British isles so that every sign in Wales, Ireland, Scotland and England would be in their own languages specific to themselves.
To deny the differences between a black haired, brown eyed Anglo to a green eyed, ginger Gael is blatantly wrong, to think that every cultural aspect of "Great" Britain is copy-pasted for each place and district is the false claim of someone who has not learned the history of these lands.
No aid should be given to the rest of the world other than blood brothers, the Celtic lands should stick together because they are cousins and family comes first.
>They ought to stand on their own, just as they wish to, and save us a great deal of difficulty and money in the process. It is only right that England be governed for the English for the first time in 400 years, no longer should Celts and Immigrants, Brits but not English, be prioritized over us.
Each country should stand up for itself and if they cannot create a somewhat successful independent nation then they are not worthy of attention, the nations own people should be it's highest priority, no more high class cunts that only think in a square mental cube of selfish interests and think about money all the time, those elitists that keep poking noses into other peoples lives because they cannot enjoy their own.
The government should exist for the people and not for themselves, they should be helping the people instead of milking the cattle just for money.

>Now a few of these """British Nationalists""" also deny the historical event of the Saxon migration that took place between the 4th and 8th centuries, at first replacing Britonnic populations (in culture most similar to the modern welsh), and over time of course the genetics became homogenous, yet they will argue that the term we use to describe this group of Germanic tribes, that is Anglo-Saxon, is actually a term made up to divide the Germanic peoples, which is about as viable as claiming that the existence of Austrian, Dutch, Belgian, Danish, Swedish and Norwegian identity was just a plot to divide the Germanic peoples, that is that it's predicated entirely on genetics and not at all on culture. I'm not opposed to the idea of a unified white state but it's simply idiocy to claim that all the differences between Europeans were invented by Jews.
Anglo-Saxons do not belong in these lands, these lands are ours but they should keep to the land that they fought for, for example most of England below Hadrian's wall and east of Machynlleth or Dolgellau in Wales should belong to the Anglo's
Most of the original Britons now live in the Isle of man and parts of Wales as well as remote places far north.
You can recognize the difference between the peoples by seeing patterns in the way of thought between the different European cultures, i have found a consistent pattern of thought between those derived of Anglo-Saxon blood, they have this sort of nosiness and stubbornness as compared to those descended from Gaelic blood, the Irish seem to be more open and honest than a Anglo, and i believe the Irish are capable of a higher intelligence than a Germanic Anglo as we are more thoughtful than them, you can tell the difference between a Anglo and a Celt by both brain, body size, genetics, hair and the eyes, the Anglo is darker in pretty much everything than a Celt which includes both behavior and brain patterns.
The Europeans should return to the old roots of their true ancestors, the Norse should return to Odin ism, the Germs should return to their patriotic warrior ways and the Celts should rediscover druidism, not the modern bullshit but true druidism with everything, including sacrifice and hallucinogens and not the made up nonsense of the modern era.
A unified European utopia would only work if each land was allowed to do as it wished because if not you would have something similar to the soviet union where each country within it had to conform to the iron fist or be executed.
>So the Welsh were conquered early on and fought tooth and nail against the English for their entire history, the Irish were too disunified to appeal to Europe, but the Scots certainly worked with Europe and nationalists worked with European regimes later in history as well, for example the friendship between Irish nationalists and European countries that wanted to take Britain down a notch during the world wars.
The Welsh have pretty much had the worst handing of cards in terms of history of these lands.
The Irish nationalists were willing to do anything to free their land, they looked for help from wherever they could because taking on the English back in 1917 was no joke as that was the last time the Britain was truly "Great."
There was a Irish fascist party in 1930's which wanted to return Irish Gaelic to the level it was spoken before the colonization of Ireland, i think that Patrick Pearse had the best view of Ireland out of all the leaders of the Easter Rising, Connolly was a Marxist who did not know the land as well as Pearse did.
Anonymous
1b4dd1a
?
No.282295
282297 282309 282311
project_Map The Blank 2020-09-09T09_29_38.501Z.html
HexTML is a fun thing to play around with. I made a simplified map of the world with it, and clicking on the arrow takes you to a submap of the Mediterranean. If I ever make a strategy game this is the sort of system I want. However, it's designed with DnD in mind so it's a helpful tool to use for campaigns. https://hextml.playest.net/

Mipui, on the other hand, is good for indoor layouts like dungeons: https://www.mipui.net

And if you just want to create an entire fantasy map to start with, try out this one: https://azgaar.github.io/Fantasy-Map-Generator/
Anonymous
1b4dd1a
?
No.282309
282310 282311 282353
HextmlWorldMap.PNG
HextmlMediterranean.PNG
>>282295
Pictures of the map so you can satisfy your curiosity without clicking on a dodgy link
Anonymous
ba4e8ab
?
No.282311
>>282309
>>282295
That's really neat
Anonymous
1b4dd1a
?
No.282319
Another fun little thing to play around with: https://sourceforge.net/projects/hexmapsphere/

Obviously it's been abandoned for a very long time, but it's just functional enough to make custom globes and see how a sphere is made out of (mostly) hexagons.
Anonymous
ff36f03
?
No.282353
>>282309
Thanks anon.
Anonymous
08eee67
?
No.282914
saga map.png
Map of Europe, loosely based on various Teutonic legends and traditions.

And before anyone spergs at me for labelling Ireland as Scotland, it wasn't just some random retarded fuck-up; Anglo-Saxon histories used the word "Scot" to refer to all Gaelic-speaking peoples, and the "Scots" who were residing in what would eventually become modern Scotland were regarded as migrants from Hibernia, which was regarded as the "Scottish" homeland.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.283033
>>279956
How to add Custom Landmasses to this thing?
I had this idea for all-white seastates that span much of the globe's surface but in patterns that allow ocean travel in premade efficient routes.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.283754
Considering the focus on custom maps, this could double as a great Alternate History thread.

What if Germany solved their jewish problem in secret without any other country knowing and then founded America ahead of schedule? Then Germany could spread their religion in Japan (They need the outside world's secrets if they ever want to unify, and Germany would only trade with them in return for religion-spreading rights. I forget if their religion was Christianity or Paganism or something else, all that matters is it's better than what Japan had at the time) and uplift the place while kicking out confucianism which ruled Japan at the time.
This was inspired by a youtube video I saw that talked about the ill-fated Christian Rebellion in Japan, speculated on what might have happened if the Christians won, and talked about how quickly the country adapted and learned from modern doctrines of "Scientific Warfare".

After making a lifelong friend and puppet out of the new Better Japan, this Superpower "Germanic Ascendancy" could fund Japan's conquest of China to keep them busy, giving Germany time to shit on the Dutch/Spanish empire, conquer Africa for the farmland, puppet India/the Middle East, and enslave the blacks. WW1 and WW2 are prevented because nobody wants to fuck with god-Germany.
Japan also takes Vietnam and North Korea, possibly also South Korea.
Then the Germanic Ascendancy takes over Russia during the summer, develops nukes first, and purges the Jews and puppets Russia.
Then it could reform from nazism into a nazi and Starship Troopers-style system where Service Guarantees Citizenship and citizenship gives you constitutional rights but blacks are always slaves at best. All scientific experimentation is legalized on blacks and on criminals, but the results of semi-legal science must be published online so free enterprise can compete with this knowledge. Once gene-modification can remove the bad genes from humanity or restrict their ability to pass on, every true white man gets an IQ high enough to stand a chance at becoming a Citizen.

Nuclear power is main power, lessening every country's dependence on big oil. oil itself becomes a moderately-expensive luxury while Solar and Wind Power are novelties until the tech to make them perfect is discovered.

A civilian corps of farmers could be formed to help the govt feed its troops, create jobs even the retards can do(so they don't just get gassed or paid to waste air), and outdo any food-monopoly megacorps while still allowing companies that do something special with their food before selling it to exist without govt competition. German Bananas farmed in Africa would be cheaper and more numerous than Nestle's bananas, but Nesquik would still exist without the govt trying to compete with it. Theoretically, no citizen with a proper job/career should starve, the barriers to entrepeneurship should be low, and The German Ascendancy's one national bank should give out ursury-free loans to German citizens.

Achieving space mining is the main priority, because resources gained from this are immensely valuable and will allow for more space-mining and eventually, space colonies and colonies on other planets. This allows infinite white expansion. And because the main German Space Ascendancy's military is so big, no splinter cell factions will rebel and try to form their own countries. Perhaps a Space Confederacy where any planet can willingly leave at any moment (and GSA's military protects the space colonies for a yearly fee) would work best.

I picked Japan because it kind of helped during WW2, tell me if you have any suggestions for what could take Better Japan's "Big Germany's favourite pet country" place.

Rate my alt-history idea, I call it "Big Germany Wins".
Anonymous
ff36f03
?
No.283765
284306 284310 284490
flat earth map directions.png
I would like to bring to the poners attention an unusual and counter intuitive fact.
Planes flying from Oceania to South America and back, always go first to California and then they continue to the south. Crazy isn't it?
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284306
284310
>>283765
Why is it like that?
Is there some hostile airspace they'd rather not risk flying over?
Anonymous
da29272
?
No.284310
284478 284490
85-851085_edit-reaction-image-safe-shrug-twilight-sparkle-mlp.png
>>284306
Because it doen't make any sense to fly from the south hemisphere to the north one, to then fly south to South America, at less, the Earth is flat like the map at >>283765
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284477
Japan seems like dogshit in retrospect.
Why did Hitler ally with this country? Did he gain anything from this alliance during WW2?
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284478
>>284310
The earth can't be flat, radio towers have to be tall so they don't get their signals fucked up by earth's curvature.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284484
284488
From what I've seen of Celtic Druidism so far, it seems pretty cool.
I want to write an alternate-history novel where a few white countries turn Druid and things go well for them.
But my power level is becoming hard to hide. I want to write an alternate history that ends in a white-only earth, but how the fuck can I write an entertaining story in such a perfect world? It would be a world without jews, a world where men and women want to be good and agree on what Good is. So where would the conflict come from? What grand conspiracies can a Young Adult novel hero uncover and destroy? Who the fuck would buy a book like this or allow me to sell it?
Anonymous
2f88460
?
No.284488
284493
>>284484
The Muslims or Mongolians would make the most sense because they are old foes of the Europeans and it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to have them still continue to wage war since both cultures still adhere to their traditions and not very much has changed since then in those countries, the only reason they stopped was because they realized we had greater technology so they ceased fighting and haven't done fuck all for a thousand years while we grew in power.
Anonymous
08eee67
?
No.284490
>>283765
>>284310
Isn't it plausible that they just don't want to fly over Antarctica? Maybe they're concerned that the extreme cold would fuck up the planes, or that a crash landing there would be totally unsurvivable?
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284493
284494 284501
>>284488
Rate my alternate history outline, I removed the weeaboo "Japan becomes useful and our friend" shit.

>Celtic Druidism becomes most popular religion in UK because I said so. Maybe it gets its own jesus figure, some saint with a silly name and gimmicky cross symbol incorporated into their flag. Druidism's focus on the "natural world" becomes explicitly pro-science and a better foundation for a good and efficient society.
>Germany and UK combine early on due to royal families marrying
>This country also founded America and moved their new capital there, because they thought doing this meant this place had to remain a monarchy-
>oh wait the monarchs are shit and get killed by anarchist idiots during the AmeriGermUKish Revolution, now all of this superpower is a constitutional fuhrerdom ruled by President-For-Life Hitler. He rules from Germany and has puppets doing as he says assigned to America and the UK.

world wars time

>WW1 is started when the Jews attempt a communist revolution in GermaUK and get crushed for it. Actual holocaust happens, fucktons of jews die from bullets to their brains because that's a hell of a lot cheaper than gas. Rich jews have their riches stolen. No survivors. Not one left.
>Commie France and Jewish Russia try to save the jews and both get conquered and crushed for it, either GermUK conquers russia absolutely or just pushes them back pretty far, getting fucktons of farmland and oil. Worldwide jew purge begins wherever the Germans can go.
>Tiny jew-free commie Russia becomes paranoid isolationist failed-state shithole if it even exists when this is over

alternatively

>WW1 is started when jews, including those expelled nonlethally from Germany minus their property, turn France and Russia communist and then attack GermaUKMerica
>Jews lose and forever snooze

could go either way

continued in part 2...
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284494
284501 284600
>>284493
pt2

>then the Islamists attack British India, fuckloads of shitskins are drafted and intentionally sent to the front lines with sub-par equipment and poor training to create more room back home for whites. Whites also fight to ensure the line doesn't fall too far back. It's war so no "peaceful" anti-British movements are allowed to exist, the elderly are drafted to be culled by being overtrained to death, and under the guise of "combatting islamic extremism and jewish subversion" all religions besides Celtic Druidism are destroyed because fuck those Indian priests who meditate atop corpses and wear child skull necklaces and eat human brains and wear corpse ash. Modernizing India into a scientific and economic powerhouse that properly utilizes its size and resources will be easier when it's not full of poo.

>both science and religion agree, fuck nonwhites. Opposition to this is heretical and anti-science. A culture is nurtured where "Real Intellectualism" means you know science and what's morally good and why you're superior to those stupid braindead jew-loving "Pseudointellectuals". This "Jewish Intellectualism" as it's also called dies for good.

>govt invests science and money into scientifically developing a martial arts style superior to kung fu, MMA, and all others. It has powerful swift strikes and grapples perfect for one master to restrict a foe's movement while others attack the foe, but it specializes in striking and escaping enemy grapples. MMA is invented ahead of schedule to become the new national sport. Mastery of the perfected MMA style becomes a point of pride for Insert Country Name Here and the GermanoBritishMerican people. Martial arts is good for the body and soul after all, and stronger people reject leftism. MMA is where bullshit ancient martial arts styles go to die in the face of scientifically-verified and battle-tested truth.

>also we have the best air force and navy, and we have nukes because nuclear power rules.
>Orphanages are nationalized and upgraded into Hitler Youth camps but better, healthy married couples can be paid for donating genetically-good kids to these places. The family unit is respected, male and female orphanage workers are intentionally paired together for long-term well-paying jobs to act as "den fathers/mothers" for these places. Abortion remains forbidden because these become excellent places for raising unwanted kids. THIS DOES NOT replace traditional parenthood, it just eliminates abortion and allows barren adults to help raise families under a based and redpilled govt's watchful eye.
>After several years and millions (if not billions) of Indians dead, the overcrowding problem solved to make modernizing and enlightening this country far easier, the whites with good gear are sent to win the war and steamroll all of the middle east, even parts of it that weren't involved in the conflict, because they have oil and we want oil, also fuck Islam and we must retake the holy land. I know we aren't christian in this timeline but if anyone should have it, it shouldn't be jews or sandniggers.

>if women's suffrage ever goes anywhere, which it likely wouldn't under a morally and scientifically literate population, they don't get the right to vote unless they earn it by working, BUT they can only work in creative jobs that don't directly take work away from men. No office bitches and DEFINITELY no diversity/gender-hires, but handmade candle stores and farmer's market stalls run by women and female animators/writers/artists are fine. Hating men and being a feminist/communist are officially declared medical disorders, reeducation camps are made to save who can be saved and eliminate who can't be saved. The thought of feminists screaming until their voices die out in straight jackets and padded rooms is a hilarious one but feeding them would probably be expensive.
>China and Japan and other asian countries remain irrelevant. The lack of feminism means they probably do better. Singapore does great and Hong Kong is NEVER given away to China.
>blacks remain in chains forever, opposition to this is anti-science and heresy. when slavery becomes less profitable they're culled or sent to the African wilderness to be each other's problems and die from wild animal attacks until we decide we want some more of their lands for white colonies. Actually fuck it, gas all blacks for white africa. Average IQ of planet rises. Or keep niggers restricted to a Safari Zone where wild animals roam free and armoured cars take the wealthy on tours through the wilderness in which niggers gradually die off.
>genetic engineering researched fully, POWs and criminals and subverters and lesser races can be experimented on freely as they are subhuman. or traitors in the case of criminals and subverters.
>big rich white countries with many high-IQ brains are great for industry, modernization, and science
>we get our flag on the moon by the 1960s and space mining operations by the 2010s.

And that's it, rate the video five stars and subscribe, don't forget to leave a comment on what you did or didn't like and what you'd do differently.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284501
284507
aryanne's diary.jpg
>>284493
>>284494
I think the backstory of why druidism would still be prevalent in the Celtic countries would be that the Anglo-Saxons were defeated by the Celts so they never had an established place in Britannia.
Gaul would be partially reconquered after the fall of Rome to Christians by the Celts and Carnutes (some extremely sacred grove in France) would be the main capital of the druids next to a few other capitals which would exclusive to each Celtic country because France is on the mainland of Europe which makes it the ideal place to conduct disputes with other European country's.
The Jewish empire's capital would be in Stalingrad since it has the most direct links to communism and is closer to the Khazar lands than Moscow, the Jews would all be situated around the Khazar deserts and would have their main capital somewhere in those sands before the based boys come and nuke into a irradiated desert later in the story.
Monarchy would still be preferred over failed democracy since democracy has shown itself to be a failure since the Jewish empire (Russian) would be the equivalent of modern day America and England and copied the concept of American freedom and they are the founders of democratic dictatorship but America would be it's own colony as it could be a close partner to the Führer-kingdom but respected for it's own unique values.
The Mongolians would not be allies of the Jews because the Mongols never believed in friendship and the Mongolians could have conquered all of China so Genghis Khan broke through the great wall of the bug men and raped the rice fields and made all of the Chinese and Indians Mongolian mutts, instead of conquering Europe they focused on the Chinese and Asia after realizing the Europeans are too technologically superior, the Muslims would be in control of all of Africa and the blacks would be eternal slaves of the Jews and Arabs which would be the basis of the Jewish empire since the Jews could have a monopoly on the Negro slave trade which actually fits their beliefs since they believe every Jew should have a slave so it would appeal to the kikes to have a race of half caste Russians mixed with Chinese blood and Siberian natives which would be the ideal slave because they are resistant to all forms of environments and equally strong.
The slave center would be in Egypt since the Muslims could have conquered all of Africa instead of attacking Europe.
A lot of the Arabs would have converted to Judaism with the Khazar's but Islam would be more dominant in the east of the middle east and Judaism would be more centered in the west, this could lead to more Jews and make (((them))) a more larger threat since (((their))) numbers would be more stacked against the Europeans and it would make a split between Judaism and Islam which would lead to them being close partners in crime.

That's my recommendations for Nigel's ultimate, supreme, one of a kind wet dream.
I would be willing to co-author it as a ghost writer,.if you wish.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284507
284512
>>284501
Thanks for the feedback, this is good! I forgot about the Mongols and Kangaskhan but if Muslims conquered black lands to sell slaves to jews, that would provide a better reason to "Liberate" and "Enlighten" those areas once the jews are gone. Would also keep China out of the way, since it somehow became a commie superpower in the real timeline and shouldn't do that in this timeline because fuck communism. But I want jews to be annihilated completely by the end of this alt-history timeline for the good of mankind in this alt-history timeline. in minecraft

Also come on, you've known me long enough to know my real ultimate supreme one of a kind wet dream is a lot bigger than this. It involves psychic powers only smart whites can develop, Pokemon-like beings, space travel and space colonization, the long histories of multiple space colonies full of family trees and politics and warring factions, and meteors that deposit fictional supreme minerals onto earth so we can have all the bullshit advantages typically given to lesser people in lesser Alt-Histories.
Every time I revise the ultimate fantasy alt-history I add more on, until it is perfect. Until it is truly ultimate. Until it is complete. Some say perfection is achieved once there is nothing left to strip away. They are wrong.

Personally I think if an alternate history has to rely on something highly unlikely like a weaker military force defeating an excessively superior country, it's a stretch but speculation on it can still be interesting.
However if you need to add new stuff like an original character changing the timeline to suit your desires, magic/psychic powers, aliens, time-travel, impossible technology, gifts from time-travellers/aliens, or new continents full of the ultimate land, or Pokemon, or ancient conspiracies and shadow govts rigging things to your liking, or meteors, it's not really an alternate history any more. It's more like historical fantasy, like Steampunk where everyone fetishizes steam and ignores superior options, possibly due to a magical do-anything element called Contrivium that leaks steam somehow while being what really powers everything. Though speculation on it can still be interesting, as long as it doesn't require bullshit hand-of-the-author wank like "A meteor deposits the ultimate steel onto Viking lands so they get super rich through trade and conquer everyone ever with the ultimate axes and swords and nobody ever takes their swords or gets a meteor of their own".

It's the difference between "What if this potential president who lost won? How would he change the timeline?" and "What if my Crusader Kings OC became the US President?". (the answer is he wins)

Anyway back to the alt-history...

I'm not really sold on Monarchy being superior to democracy.
Democracy is only perfect when the people of a democracy are good enough, but monarchy is only good when the rulers are perfect.
The mental image of the ultimate King/Queen/Emperor waving their hands to make massive armies loyal to the death obliterate xeno scum looks cool, but history's full of shit rulers and the world is full of ways for even "absolute" monarchs to get pozzed or cucked.
Nothing guarantees the small chance that a relative of a ruler will be smart, mature, wise, or focused on the future besides a fear of getting beheaded or any mistakes they make getting their country conquered by rivals.
Sure, he or she will be raised from birth to get good at the responsibility of ruling... Hopefully. It's hopefully guaranteed if that kid's next in line for something, or likely to end up in charge after fewer than a few hundred spares kick the bucket.
Sure, unpopular monarchs can be fired or beheaded, but the same can be said for any system that gives the people the means to fire or behead their leader. And monarchy doesn't have a good track record of allowing those conditions to exist for long.
In this timeline democracy fails because we give the right to vote out to animals who outnumber us and are raised to think they're owed success and failure is something magically forced upon them by us. They're raised to think life is a zero-sum game and anyone who eats more than them only does so because someone magically stole food they think they're owed.
We foolishly allow the jew to sabotage our children while promoting animalistic behaviours. There would be no fetishization of the lowest in this timeline, the right to vote would be something everyone would need to earn, something denied to the worst groups.
It wasn't a member of a royal family who invented lightbulbs or cars or planes, these things were developed and tested and improved upon by geniuses with the freedom to create what they wanted and sell what the world quickly realized it needed.
The next genius could come from anywhere, except low-iq shitholes.
In a timeline where meritocracy, logic, self-determination, and the freedom for the smart and strong to succeed without interference from everyone's favourite parasitic menace are held as the ultimate ideals, only the best rulers would be elected and the corrupt would not remain rulers for long. Swift and efficient courts with reformed and perfected laws would develop swift and efficient procedures for rooting out and removing corruption.
Though if there must be a monarchy somewhere... What if there was a caste system where those from lower and poorer castes can somehow prove their intellect and morality, and ascend to a higher caste on their own merit? a sort of "Aristocratic Meritocracy" where the best of society are raised and brought together to breed and create offspring that might one day earn the right to mix with royalty.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284512
284514 284596
high society.jpg
>>284507
>Democracy is only perfect when the people of a democracy are good enough, but monarchy is only good when the rulers are perfect.
Well look at America now, were those people the US back in 1776 not good enough for the state? Democracy has failed and that is the reason why it is so widespread now because it is easily ruined after a few presidents, not a single European country is ruled by royals and even then the only royal family's are extremely selfish due to being sons of sin, Monarchy has existed for a very, very long time and was a concept of European invention but i think the people should be able to still vote for the next king since the original king should not be able to allow his personal bias choose in favor of the people's choice which would allow both voting and Monarchy at the same time.
>The mental image of the ultimate King/Queen/Emperor waving their hands to make massive armies loyal to the death obliterate xeno scum looks cool, but history's full of shit rulers and the world is full of ways for even "absolute" monarchs to get pozzed or cucked.
So their should always be a plan B in the case of an emergency where the king is unable to produce profitable sperm or somehow dies without any siblings to take his role.
>Nothing guarantees the small chance that a relative of a ruler will be smart, mature, wise, or focused on the future besides a fear of getting beheaded or any mistakes they make getting their country conquered by rivals.
Usually depends on the IQ level of their father and mother, parents with high intelligence have a higher chance of creating relatively smart offspring due to the genetics of the mother and father, a dumb mother and father usually produces dumb children.
>Sure, unpopular monarchs can be fired or beheaded, but the same can be said for any system that gives the people the means to fire or behead their leader.
If the king had multiple sons his other sons should take their brothers role while keeping his previous brother away from him so that no sibling jealousy can interfere.
>And monarchy doesn't have a good track record of allowing those conditions to exist for long.
Neither does democracy have a good record of consistently good leaders.
>It wasn't a member of a royal family who invented lightbulbs or cars or planes, these things were developed and tested and improved upon by geniuses with the freedom to create what they wanted and sell what the world quickly realized it needed.
Inventors are masters of creativity and leaders are masters of a leading, if you put the guy who made planes in power i bet you he would have not known what the fuck to do, these two types of people in society are not totally compatible to switch roles as they are both best suited for different designs and decisions, Philosophers are a good choice for leadership since they understand history and base their beliefs from the past so they it is easier to decide what the correct option is to choose when leading since they already what options caused failure from looking at what caused collapse in previous civilizations.

Celestia and Luna would be great as rulers of our world so maybe there could be a duel rule by 2 brothers or something, i don't think there has been an example of this to my knowing and if both brothers were perfect for ruling then it is possible that this could be extremely beneficial to the kingdom since if both of them were experts in critical thinking and well versed in history as well as politics then it could be the best system and if one brother died the other one would be still alive and able to continue to lead on.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284514
>>284512
>since they already what options caused failure from looking at what caused collapse in previous civilizations.
Since they already know*
Also the other brother would already have experience in ruling before his other brother perishes.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284596
284597 284610
>>284512
Why didn't you say anything about the meritocratic caste idea? It would basically be eugenics without bloodshed, as people meritocratically earn more rights, better healthcare and higher priority, better police protection, the societal expectation that you'll mate with someone of your caste instead of someone poorer than you but cute, and more. It's not an "Equal" system but man is not an equal species.

I'm still not sold on monarchy as a system more viable than meritocracy.
Corruption is only allowed to exist in this dark timeline because most people are raised from birth to be ignorant useful pawns for the system. Christianity has been dead ever since the preachers raped Christ and God to death because the Jews told them not doing so would make them sexist and uninclusive.
Schools dog-train obedience into children and inddoctrinate hatred for the white man into teenagers. The narcissism of the boomers is exploited and rewarded by a govt that makes a killing taxing the generation that gleefully robbed its nation's youth and gave most of it away to the enemies. This country is full of leftist traitors to humanity who would celebrate if America burned and its ruins were split apart to form separate socialist states. Any mentally competent population that desires a future would kick these anti-future demons out or recognize their mental instability as a medical disorder that revokes your right to vote at best and your right to breathe ideally.
The societal rot we're seeing in America took decades to achieve and propaganda campaigns on a scale never imagined before. It took numerous traitor-generations and the bloated sinboomers unwilling to hand over the keys to power and institutionalized brainwashing on a scale that would give Evil Cartoon Fantasy Hitler a boner before things got this bad for the humans alive today in this timeline.
It took many decades, perhaps even centuries, for things to get this bad. Power was spread out as much as possible, but the kikes and demonrats still wormed their way into power to form the Deep State.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284597
284598 284647 284653 284655
>>284596
It took multiple secret organizations like the CIA and FBI, it took countless assassinations and murders and blackmails, many of which got uncovered. The ruling class's crimes go unpunished because the populace is disarmed and pathetic, the wet dream of every corrupt tyrant. A monarch would kill to get such a weak and feminized and fractured and brainwashed populace under their control.

It would only take one corrupt king or queen in power to ruin the country as quickly or slowly as he liked, and this corrupt king or queen could take power by assassinating heirs in the way.
In a constitutional republic, people have rights and are willing to fight for them by executing any threat to them. It's the only way to be sure. Individuals out of poverty are typically able to afford better gear than the cops that enforce the law(ever compared a cop's shitty pistol to a NEET with a tacticool loadout?) and in a civilized society, cops wouldn't be flown to Israel to be trained in police-brutality techniques or brainwashed into hating the white citizenry and hiring novelties like black/women cops wouldn't be a higher priority than hiring good men.
In my theoretical all-white countries, there would be no niggers and no jews. No idiotic masses easily convinced to vote away their rights for short-term benefits. No traitors to white people living in white land. Even if jews got voted into power in these countries (and they couldn't), nobody white would vote for the jew if they remembered what the jew is. And schools would make sure to teach that. Divorced Beheaded Died Whatever? No, kids would be taught the name of every country the jews were expelled from and why.
It would take a truly mind-blowing level of long-term corruption, an incalculable number of truly evil people enacting their agenda too slow for most people to notice, before any constitutional republic got as bad as ours did. The Founding Fathers designed it to resist corruption and decentralize power while keeping every position of power accountable to those below it including the armed populace, after all.
But a King could declare lockdown, the revocation of gun and free speech rights, the removal of religious rights, and the removal of all human rights in an afternoon without any rebellion the militarized police or literal military couldn't put down.

White people have nowhere on this planet they can go. There is no one safe zone to retreat to. The jew owns the globe because the previous generations sold it, and we're left with nothing we can do to fight it except pretending it'll help to wake other retards up so we can scream in our final moments together. This frog has been boiled because the pot is full of niggers. We have no long-term survival plan and no plans on how to take back control of our fates.

>"Dual government heads"
The only benefit of a "One man in charge of everything" system is that there is nobody at his level to argue with or above his level to answer two. What happens when two brother-kings disagree on how to rule their country? A civil war? A duel between the two brothers? An assassination, followed by half the country revolting because they liked the other king more? There is no tie-breaker in a two-king country. That's why it's usually restricted to the real of fantasy, where these questions are never brought up unless it's part of the backstory for why the bad king and brother of the good king went bad. I'm trying not to comment on your "Celestia and Luna would make good rulers" comment, they're cartoon characters.
But for a monarchy to work, the ruler in charge must be a good and competent person.
For a dual-monarchy to work, both people involved need to be good people who agree on everything important, making the second king a non-issue.
But for a constitutional republic to fail, the entire population has to be mainly comprised of lazy, stupid, selfish, apathetic, sinful, greedy, evil pieces of shit, with all their many needs taken care of by an indoctrinated and fanatically loyal servant-caste of eternally-forgiving, eternally-poor, and eternally-oppressed whites.

What if the government was not ruled by one individual, but by a council of specialists in various fields who make quick decisions based on their areas of expertise and are unable to interfere with the business of other councils?
"But what about matters that affect the whole nation"?
All governmental matters affect the whole nation. The chief of police and chief of military do their jobs, just like the chief of water and the chief of power and chief of infrastructure and chief of business(leader of task force designed to prevent corrupt businesses and ensure they follow the law by reporting lawbreaking to the cops and ensure the businesses compete fairly without monopolies) do their jobs.
Specialization within government itself, rather than hoping one generalized leadership role filled by a movie star or spoiled brat of a prince can micromanage everything and all his underlings with their own agendas alone.
Under this system the police would naturally have the most power, as they enforce the laws others follow, but everything the police and courts do would have to be publically-available, so the population knows whose home to riot outside if something truly terrible was done.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284598
>>284597
*realm of fantasy
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284600
284655
>>284494
also GermUKMerica's martial art includes: scientifically perfected kickboxing, scientifically perfected grappling, accurate shooting, and scientifically perfected HEMA big-sword/zweihander duelling.
realistically nobody would ever combine sword and gun, or use gun over sword. But being good with a sword is a cool masculine status symbol. People can duel nonlethally with training sabers and fight properly, people can't fistfight properly without damaging themselves or their foe.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284610
284654
>>284596
>Why didn't you say anything about the meritocratic caste idea?
It didn't interest me very much so i left it alone.
>It would basically be eugenics without bloodshed, as people meritocratically earn more rights, better healthcare and higher priority, better police protection, the societal expectation that you'll mate with someone of your caste instead of someone poorer than you but cute, and more.
Can you elaborate more on the way it works rather than glorifying it?
>It's not an "Equal" system but man is not an equal species.
No man or woman is equal, not very many people like to believe this but i don't get how dumb most people are for not spending time thinking about things like this, each star sign predetermines who and what you are from the first second you were born but no one can see how clear this is.
>Corruption is only allowed to exist in this dark timeline because most people are raised from birth to be ignorant useful pawns for the system.
Due to their own parents focusing more on themselves then actually giving all of their thought to the benefit of their children, if you really cared about your kids you wouldn't force them into a useless education system where you are indoctrinated into how to think and behave, a good parent should want whats best for their offspring and should spend more time deciding what is best for them instead of following what their parents did before them without questioning why like a sheep would do, it continues to baffle me how dumb most people are, they can't think about the things they are doing to their own children and when that child resists they are beaten or disciplined severely for disobeying their parents naive expectations of what they think a child should be, this way of forceful upbringing creates a implementation of pressure and release as there is pressure in attempting the task or being told to do some task and a release when it is complete which releases a confirmation to the animal brain that they did something good, they use this system of teaching in animals and children without a second thought as to why which creates humans with brains no better than a dog's.
>Christianity has been dead ever since the preachers raped Christ and God to death because the Jews told them not doing so would make them sexist and uninclusive.
Christianity was a failure from the spreading of the bible, it was meant to be a way to put people into a form of submission as it created devout little dumb sheep that followed their church which was very effective at making people base their beliefs off of fear and false hope because it made people submit to the fear of a Jewish made god and hope for a better life by giving themselves to chains and restrictions which when you look at it is the complete definition of slavery except this was the willing decision of the sheep which is the most effective form of slavery since the cattle don't know they are enslaved and are deluded by thinking they are actually free when they are not.

Why did Europe enter a 'dark age' when at the time Christianity was the most dominant religion? If Christianity was so good it wouldn't have caused so many deaths of European traditions and deaths of men, women and children, Christianity is a disgrace and many people don't even know what yule even though Christmas is a copy paste of this ancient tradition and has nothing to do with Christ but the (((Saints))) wanted to (((Christianize))) our ancient cultures and make us slaves, that's what Christianity really is, a way of brainwashing children from a young age and lying to them saying that if they are good little dogs they will eventually get on gods good list, so, so many atrocities have occurred since the implementation of this false religion of lies and no one remembers them or the men who died for no reason only to be told that they will go to some made up place in the sky.
Communism is only a more complex form of Christianity which will put the Europeans into another 'dark age' but this one will last longer and be the true end of our way of life since they will remove the Christian traditions that copied from our old religions, a way of finally getting rid of us and killing our spirits after Christianity has already weakened our morals and beliefs, this was all planned long ago by the most evilest beings this universe has ever known but no one understands unless they break free of their own mental chains and go against the gospel of control and Christian slave laws.
>Schools dog-train obedience into children and inddoctrinate hatred for the white man into teenagers.
This, so many lost souls have claimed their own lives because of being left in the dark and shouted at for being demonized, the schools were implemented as a method of indoctrination of Christianity on children but have slowly forced worse and worse beliefs onto our own people's children just to see what shit the government cunts could make the cattle believe.
I have always been hated by the system for seeing straight through these horrible lies and they wished to enslave me but i am not a dog.
>The narcissism of the boomers is exploited and rewarded by a govt that makes a killing taxing the generation that gleefully robbed its nation's youth and gave most of it away to the enemies.
The people should be the primary focus of a nation because many people cannot think for themselves due to them still being stuck in a childish way of thinking so they need someone to help them but those people who are bottom barrel dumb fucks should be eliminated if they cannot provide for themselves and leach off of others, a man should be able to live from the fruits of the land instead of material money but (((they))) made sure that this is impossible in our own homelands so that we must first enslave ourselves to weak material wealth before we can attempt to claim our own personal land.

(Shit did i write that much?)
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284633
luna celestia eclipse.png
>This country is full of leftist traitors to humanity who would celebrate if America burned and its ruins were split apart to form separate socialist states.
This place was fucked since the Anglo-Saxons took over but now if you look back into history you can see a steady decline over time and now this is the final judgement that will come in the next couple of years that will decide the true fate of humanity.
>Any mentally competent population that desires a future would kick these anti-future demons out or recognize their mental instability as a medical disorder that revokes your right to vote at best and your right to breathe ideally.
It saddens me every time i think of why no one does anything to stop all these terrible acts or exposes them but instead is swept under the rug to be obscured from the sight of the sheep, if the secrets were revealed like Hitler did then maybe our people would become conscious and wake up again but we are our own leaders that can govern our own world which no one realizes how powerful we really are because they are too ignorant.
Jews should have been gassed 6 million years ago.
>The societal rot we're seeing in America took decades to achieve and propaganda campaigns on a scale never imagined before.
The rot of our cultures and traditions has taken more than 2000 years to accomplish and now almost no one remembers the past or dares look at what we used to be before all this poison polluted our once holy wells.
>It took numerous traitor-generations and the bloated sinboomers unwilling to hand over the keys to power and institutionalized brainwashing on a scale that would give Evil Cartoon Fantasy Hitler a boner before things got this bad for the humans alive today in this timeline.
None of these things that the government has done to it's own people can ever be redeemed of justified to how it was 2000 years ago, i know that but i still dream of those times, it's a damn disappointment that our people have been subverted this much from what we used to hold high.
It took many decades, perhaps even centuries, for things to get this bad.
It started ever since the spread of Christianity, Jews spread the bible, lied to our ancestors and taught a false religion, now they are in power because of this religion, back 2000 years ago our people were the leaders of our own blood but now the people who are in power do not have the people in their best interest due to their own incompetence and evilness, we are being lead by a death cult and we must smite them then return to the ways of our forefathers if we are willing to save ourselves, our lands and our people.

I can only hope for a brighter future instead of a darker one, this land will not be totally overcome as it will never happen but there shall forever be struggle, times of victory and times of defeat, the earth shall be bathed in the flame of war forever and the waters of life shall continue to flow until they are dry.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284647
284656 284659
HowVeryEconomical.png
>>284597
>It took multiple secret organizations like the CIA and FBI, it took countless assassinations and murders and blackmails, many of which got uncovered. The ruling class's crimes go unpunished because the populace is disarmed and pathetic, the wet dream of every corrupt tyrant.
Most people do not like truth and prefer to surround themselves with distractions amidst comfortable lies, the workplace and social gatherings are good examples of distractions, you are mentally enslaved from the school and then expected to get a dip shit diploma or some piece of paper that says your a good and obedient sheep then work in a slave job that you don't even like, then there is the distractions, video games are an excellent way of occupying your spare time so that you can not focus on the harsh reality's that surround us.
>A monarch would kill to get such a weak and feminized and fractured and brainwashed populace under their control.
That is a corrupt king, if the leader is exceptional they should rule for the duration of their lives and because they are gifted in intelligence and genetics their offspring would have similar features and intelligence which would be better than having a new president every couple of years because each president or leader should similar goals in mind to the previous one and should be the benefit of the state rather than mere selfish gains.
>It would only take one corrupt king or queen in power to ruin the country as quickly or slowly as he liked, and this corrupt king or queen could take power by assassinating heirs in the way.
Thus there should be a system similar to the way the Celts organized their hierarchy, there would be druids who gave the kings of Ireland wisdom, health, advice and knowledge, they would assist him in his rule and if so could remove from power if time showed to be inadequate, there would be a chief druid who was his main advisor for legal disputes and conflicts, the druids were very learned and knew very much which is what made them good advisors for the kings.
With good advice and help a good king could become an excellent one.
>In a constitutional republic, people have rights and are willing to fight for them by executing any threat to them.
That's the foundation of a good society, do not prioritize the government instead of the people unless you want the structure of the government to collapse.
>It's the only way to be sure.
People have a right to defend themselves and fight for what they honor if they are incapable of doing this then they are weak, to deny a man his own rights is worse than death as it is the ultimate enslavement and any true man would die defending what he holds true.
>Individuals out of poverty are typically able to afford better gear than the cops that enforce the law(ever compared a cop's shitty pistol to a NEET with a tacticool loadout?) and in a civilized society, cops wouldn't be flown to Israel to be trained in police-brutality techniques or brainwashed into hating the white citizenry and hiring novelties like black/women cops wouldn't be a higher priority than hiring good men.
Women are what makes continue to live, if they are placed into the workplace or god forbid made to enroll the governments orders then they are totally subverted away from what they made to be, women can be fighters but they should not do the government's bidding as men fit that role better due to them being naturally superior in that line of work to women.
Women are capable of work but should not do a mans job because that distracts a women from her own jobs that best suite them.
The police are only here to enforce the law of the government which is the opposite of what they should be doing, they should enforce justice not law and the irony of this is that they are now criminals which is a complete contradiction of what they should exist for.
>In my theoretical all-white countries, there would be no niggers and no jews.
I would give anything for a world without either of them.
>No idiotic masses easily convinced to vote away their rights for short-term benefits.
The people should be allowed to decide their own education instead of it being government forced, in this so called "Great Britain" you have to pay to get home schooled but the normal schools do not cost anything, this is a real good show of how backwards this place truly is, yet no one even thinks about the whys or hows of their nation because of how blind everyone is.

In my dream society schools should teach truth instead of lies, there should be multiple choices of different types of schools, each catering to different types of knowledge, the first one should test the level of intelligence of the child and test what they are capable of doing then the child or the parents should decide where go to from there as there would be medical, historical, psychological, scientific and finally political, there should be another more important one which teaches life skill such as cooking your own food, growing plants, hunting animals, building houses and all other forms of sustaining yourself and creating your own personal family.
Children should begin at the age of 7 as it is a better starting point for learning.
(You) can put this in the story if you want.
>No traitors to white people living in white land. Even if jews got voted into power in these countries (and they couldn't), nobody white would vote for the jew if they remembered what the jew is.
>And schools would make sure to teach that. Divorced Beheaded Died Whatever? No, kids would be taught the name of every country the jews were expelled from and why.
The Jew should humiliated and exposed for the rest of eternity as long as the Aryan way of life exists along with the crimes and stupidity of the Negro race being shown on full display right next to the Jew's lies and atrocity's.
No one should forget the countless men who died exposing the Jew's unspeakable crimes, Jesus was one of them but now his words are ignored and Hitler is treated the same way.

Con
Anonymous
aed46cc
?
No.284648
284655 284659
MapChart_Map-1.png
>>279956
R8 m8's
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284653
284659
es lebe.png
>>284597
>It would take a truly mind-blowing level of long-term corruption, an incalculable number of truly evil people enacting their agenda too slow for most people to notice, before any constitutional republic got as bad as ours did.
That's why Christianity was spread so far, it was the perfect way of programming the minds of men and now (((they))) are making way for an even worse indoctrination program that is called communist socialism, communism is the new Christendom.
>The Founding Fathers designed it to resist corruption and decentralize power while keeping every position of power accountable to those below it including the armed populace, after all.
The system that the founding fathers designed is now outdated and was obviously flawed since if there was truly no seams in the original concept of America then we wouldn't be here, democracy has failed.
The founding fathers idea was good but not good enough, it was made a few hundred years ago and at the time they didn't have access to the idea of National Socialism, Nat Soc is a better version of the founding fathers ideas because it improves on everything that they wanted for the USA as it is pretty much a more up to date version of declaration of independence and actually calls out the Jews which the founding fathers didn't.
>But a King could declare lockdown, the revocation of gun and free speech rights, the removal of religious rights, and the removal of all human rights in an afternoon without any rebellion the militarized police or literal military couldn't put down.
And as such the Anglo version of kingdom should be abolished and Celtic kingship should take it's place as a dead ideology is raised from the dead and rises from the ashes of times once forgotten, the Celts designed a better form of Monarch rule than the Anglo-Saxons did as it actually favored the people instead of the ruling class.
I do not like the Anglo's idea of kingdom as it has failed with many other ideas that came from these conquered lands.
The king should be advised by other head leaders, National Socialism is a good example of this as Goebbels and Himmler were pretty much Hitler's chief druids and functioned like them, Hitler made a good system by looking into the past and taking the best ideas from it.
Hitler made his own form of a kingdom and would have worked if it was left to prosper and grow, i guess that Hitler's system is a good example of duel rule.
>White people have nowhere on this planet they can go. There is no one safe zone to retreat to.
Our holy lands are conquered, we either fight to the death where our ancestors once died or lay down our armor and swords.
>The jew owns the globe because the previous generations sold it, and we're left with nothing we can do to fight it except pretending it'll help to wake other retards up so we can scream in our final moments together.
It's better to go out with a bang then a hushed cry.
>This frog has been boiled because the pot is full of niggers. We have no long-term survival plan and no plans on how to take back control of our fates.
What is the point of sitting around all day distracting yourself when we could be planning your own future?
That is what i prefer to do, i don't play games as much anymore because i have realized they don't give you any great levels of knowledge or help you in any great way, you sit on your ass while focusing all of your mind onto something that does not matter in the long run.
Do not complain that no one is doing anything when you know that crying all day won't help anyone, i am giving you advice.
>The only benefit of a "One man in charge of everything" system is that there is nobody at his level to argue with or above his level to answer two.
Which is what makes English kingship fall apart, the foundation is very open to being exploited which makes it not a very reliable system for long term rule.
Fuck Anglo monarchy.
>What happens when two brother-kings disagree on how to rule their country? A civil war? A duel between the two brothers? An assassination, followed by half the country revolting because they liked the other king more?
The brothers can each try both ideas and see which one prevails without bloodshed, there are better ways of solving a debate then turning to petty violence, the kings should not be violent men as that is a destructive personality which will fall apart if there was to be a cooperative rule between two brothers and would falter the advancement of the kingdom.
>There is no tie-breaker in a two-king country. That's why it's usually restricted to the real of fantasy, where these questions are never brought up unless it's part of the backstory for why the bad king and brother of the good king went bad.
Hitler and Himmler was a sort of form of cooperative rule but Himmler was not allowed as much power as Hitler was better suited for the role of leading the country then Himmler.
>I'm trying not to comment on your "Celestia and Luna would make good rulers" comment, they're cartoon characters.
I pointed out that it has not been tried before and might be a interesting form of rule as it is an interesting and creative concept, it is a cartoon but one of the best i have ever seen.
>But for a monarchy to work, the ruler in charge must be a good and competent person.
This is true, we already have many examples of monarchs which were not stopped, look at countess Bathory, she did many diabolic acts and none of them saved her in the end and lived until a old age without being put to the rope.
>For a dual-monarchy to work, both people involved need to be good people who agree on everything important, making the second king a non-issue.
This is also true, maybe the first king should not hold as much power as the first.

It's funny if you look at Luna and Celestia as Hitler and Himmler, Faust was pretty creative.
Hail Faust /)

(Cont)
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284654
284655 284669 284716
>>284610
>stratified meritocratic caste system
I don't like this system, it's just an idea I've been thinking about and it's not set in stone yet.
But basically, every person would have a rank.
Beginner, Apprentice, Adventurer, Journeyman, Lord, Baronet, Baron, Viscount, Earl, Marquess, Duke, Master, Grand Master, that sort of thing.
Also a Peasant class. Kids are Beginners, but as they grow up they should rank up to Journeyman or be demoted to Peasant. The "Beginner" class is for under 16s only, a safety net that stops people from getting into the lowest class until they're legal adults.
This would be separate from any Titles anyone might have. Prince Jake from England could still just be a Baron in the ranking system.
Having a higher rank would force public services like restaurants, hospitals, and the police forces to put your needs above the needs of those with lower ranks than you. Restaurants and nightclubs could choose to only serve those with high ranks, trains and planes could have VIP cars for those with high ranks only, and so on.
Your personal ID card (needed to buy booze and prove your age) gets a nicer-looking background on it as your rank improves. A QR Code on your card can let anyone with the right tool or app check the online database to see what your rank really is, so forgeries become impossible.

Imagine a health service where a business owner, a worker, and a writer all pay the same for their health service. However the worker is prioritized over the writer and the business owner is prioritized over the worker, and all three are prioritized above the useless layabout unemployed chav who is still ranked above the immigrant, because the health service decides who the higher priorities must always be, triage-style.
Having a high rank would make you more likely to get promotions in the workplace, force the cops to make protecting you and recovering your stolen property/avenging any crimes against you higher-priority than doing anything for those of lower castes, etc.
Having a high class rank would improve your lot in life.
A lifetime of good behaviour and hard work could let you enter bars and nightclubs for high-class citizenry only, or "have your pick of the litter" when it comes to choosing which lower-class woman to uplift and promote into becoming your property.
Low-class women can't divorce higher-class men unless they can prove criminal behaviour is going on in that home.
Workers who get disabled from workplace injuries that aren't their fault can get benefits but poor people who never worked get no benefits. Workers with no intellectual ability can still reach higher castes by putting in extra unpaid hours at charity businesses or some kind of "Free Works System" building where workers with free time are sent around the country to live in the Free Works buildings and put in hours building neat shit for the public. But it wouldn't raise your class TOO high, those who create more good by running large businesses that provide good services for the citizenry would have higher ranks, and those who create immense good via new world-changing inventions and innovations would get higher ranks above that.
Disobeying the rank system by putting the needs of a lowly Peasant above a Duke... It should only be a crime for the cops to do that. Shitty restaurants for Peasants Only and shitty restaurants where "everyone is equal" should be allowed to exist, because rich-ass Masters and Grand Masters would never visit them, and would instead visit more expensive restaurants for Masters and Grand Masters only.
You can go and get IQ tested to see where you mentally belong rank-wise, but the rank would also take into account your moral worth as determined by what crimes you did or did not commit, how much you donate to charity, and how much good you provide to your country and community via taxes and whether you run a profitable business or not.
Good little Uber-Druid (I can't think of a name for the religion) GermaUKMericans will get higher ranks than loudmouthed obnoxious atheist GermaUKMericans in this theoretical country.
It's kind of like China's Social Credit system except not a horrifying invasion of privacy and violation of human rights.
This system wouldn't restrict your thoughts or punish political dissenters, just reward what you CHOOSE to do with your time on this earth. Having the "wrong" political opinions wouldn't reduce your "person score" and having low-class friends wouldn't reduce your person score. You couldn't be banned from ALL public transport systems, but private companies performing public transport services would be free to say "These nicer busses/trains are for high-class citizens only, we have two shit citizen busses/trains a day designed to help people get to and from major job-hubs and that's it".

I don't think this system has been fully worked-out yet. It might have flaws. Still, it's an interesting in-progress idea.
A stratified class system that rewards those who provide more good to the state and white race via economic growth and hard work/time by placing their needs above those who do not do good for their people.
Protects smart poors from chavs. Disincentivizes laziness.
Those of higher classes would breed to create genetically-better kids, or buy many poor women and have many kids that way, and each kid would need to compete within this system to rise through the ranks and prove what's been genetically passed down to them has made them better people than others. Eugenics either way.
It even provides a clear upwards path towards success for even the lowliest worker. Someone without money couldn't donate money, but could still donate time to building a public park or nature reserve or neodruid church or some other architectural wonder planned out by a great architect.
And I mean a fucking great architect, not some postmodernist brutalist minimalist cunt obsessed with glass and steel and concrete blocks and cocks.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284655
284660
lastjew.JPG
>>284597
>But for a constitutional republic to fail, the entire population has to be mainly comprised of lazy, stupid, selfish, apathetic, sinful, greedy, evil pieces of shit, with all their many needs taken care of by an indoctrinated and fanatically loyal servant-caste of eternally-forgiving, eternally-poor, and eternally-oppressed whites.
Which is why race mixing is so promoted nowadays, the half caste mongrel mestizo shares both aspects of each race and is the ideal slave for the Jews in the future, they want the Aryan to be bred into a despicable dumb race of slaves as it suites (((their))) beliefs, what other reason would there be for the promoting of race mixing?
>What if the government was not ruled by one individual, but by a council of specialists in various fields who make quick decisions based on their areas of expertise and are unable to interfere with the business of other councils?
That is pretty much a glorified version of the Roman senate, i doubt it would work as each person would need to be skilled in every department of politics, there would be a lot of clashing ideals and beliefs which could cause a split in the council, also fuck the council of England.
>All governmental matters affect the whole nation. The chief of police and chief of military do their jobs, just like the chief of water and the chief of power and chief of infrastructure and chief of business(leader of task force designed to prevent corrupt businesses and ensure they follow the law by reporting lawbreaking to the cops and ensure the businesses compete fairly without monopolies) do their jobs.
That sounds unnecessarily complicated.
>Specialization within government itself, rather than hoping one generalized leadership role filled by a movie star or spoiled brat of a prince can micromanage everything and all his underlings with their own agendas alone.
So like the brotherhood of steel in fallout 1?
They had a council and a main leader who was the elder which governed the main problems and lead the faction.
What you are detailing sounds a lot like it anyways.
>Under this system the police would naturally have the most power, as they enforce the laws others follow, but everything the police and courts do would have to be publically-available, so the population knows whose home to riot outside if something truly terrible was done.
That sounds like a system that would collapse from the beginning, the police are meant to do the bidding of the government, pawns, they are incapable of leading a nation as they need a higher leadership to even exist as a institution of justice.
>>284600
It sounds like a interesting idea, it may actually work as every method will be tested through the fires of fighting.
>>284648
I like the Aryan union, i give it a 8/8
>>284654
Oh come on i was just about done with this post, now i have got a wall bigger than China's in front of me, i'll continue this later tonight or tomorrow.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284656
284657 284716
>>284647
>would be better than having a new president every couple of years
Didn't America initially have some kind of "New President every 20 years, no limits on the number of terms" system that got changed to "4 years per term, 2 terms tops" because some popular Republican kept getting to be in charge?

>Druid class advising the king, with the capability to remove and replace him
I like this idea a lot. It could work for a Constitutional Republic that had "the leader must have Druid values" as one of the Constitution's rules.

>Schools
Online schooling is innovating in ways the public schooling systems (((pozzed by the Jews and Unions))) could never dream of.
Thirty or more white kids can have their school experience ruined by one uppity negro child in this timeline, especially since teachers are trained to (and forced to) prioritize his feelings over actual education. Homeschooling bypasses this completely, other kids can not negatively impact your child's learning experience.
Bad teachers can abuse your child when you're not looking, or let your kid get abused by other kids and encourage things to remain this abusive via punishing any child who defends himself...
But a good homeschooling system (One that doesn't just get everyone together in a fucking skype call) lets any child learn at their own pace on their own time, meaning parents can watch their kids as they work and help them understand things if the need arises. Fewer uncontrolled variables.
In the current schooling system, "Civil servants" who hate you and kids raise your kids to hate you and love unions/communism/forcing the taxpayer to pay for everyone's overpriced tuition. This would change under a free system where parents are free to chose the best education resources online for their kids.
And if your school turns out to be a piece of shit, you can always sue the individual school and the teachers involved for being shit and wasting your child's time/poisoning your child's mind. Knowledge of this would quickly spread and no good parent would willingly send their kid to a shit school.
No parent would be forced to send their kid to the least-shitty school around.
Home schooling can allow the best experts in any field to work with teaching experts to create courses where lectures teach and coursework tests both memory of the knowledge given and more importantly, the understanding obtained.
Home schooling can allow the smartest students who devour and understand information quickly to gain more qualifications, and they won't need to be held back for the benefit of stupider students in their class. They won't need to have hours of their life wasted every day after breezing through countless repetitive worksheets designed for retarded babies.
"Most of my students pass my class" would no longer be what measures success for a school. Instead, "Most of the kids who leave my class are successful and we've never been sued for being shit" would be what measures success for an online school.
This is unquestionably the superior system, it allows kids anywhere regardless of their physical location to learn anything they might need to rise wherever they want to go.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284657
284716 284724
>>284656
pt2

Plus, if the father works and the mother stays home, the mother could still aid in their child's education. Or schedule the education to take place when both parents are home and able to do their best to help their child.
Finally, online education would make it easy for Human Resources faggots to check the work that gave their possible employees qualifications and doctorates or whatever, rather than hiring people based on personality and politics. This means Human Resourcefags would be expected to actually understand the field they're hiring people to work in, reducing the chance that incompetent manhaters end up deciding who works at a company and who doesn't.

A system where men perform all the real work and manage all the real work, while women are allowed the easiest and most feel-good kinds of work that won't interfere with a man's work (writing, animating, singing, acting, making shit and selling it) seems like the best compromise between "Women should never work and be babymakers only" and "Women should be allowed to get in the way of working men".
Those one-in-a-million good writers/singers/animators still get to prove themselves in the free market, and by being their own boss they will still have the freedom to take breaks for babymaking and raising children, but nobody will put the public's safety at risk by mandating the hiring of less-qualified and physically/mentally weaker workers.
No whores will extort their bosses for pregnant paid leave.
Women will be their own responsibilities, or the responsibility of the husband who chooses them.
Women will get to feel like they have the best of both worlds, because they pretty much will have it and precisely no more.
There will be no women who waste their lives gossiping in offices as their eggs die out. No women who cheat and lie to climb higher up the corporate ladder. No campaigns to make women think they are owed the right to manage men and rule as tyrants when simple wholesome creative hobbies and motherhood are what really make women happy and mentally-stable in the long term.
They will get to have easy work with little pressure to succeed, a hobby that gives them something to do besides joining and serving cults, and the chance of becoming world-renowned genius best-selling writers/animators/singers/whatever, but there will be no women in the military or office or government.

>if there was truly no seams in the original concept of America then we wouldn't be here
The seams had to be created over time, under the nose of an under-informed and overly-trusting white public that at one point literally needed to be told via government-funded TV PSAs "OI, TEENAGE BOYS! DO NOT GET INTO THE CARS OF STRANGE MEN BECAUSE THEY MIGHT BE FAGGOTS WHO WILL RAPE YOU!!!". Limits were placed on the elected while the (((professional politicians))) in the pockets of jews or jew megacorps got to rule unopposed for decades. Stupid and evil foreigners had to be imported to replace the white Americans and vote for corrupt liberals and jews offering free shit paid for by the taxpayer.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284659
284689 284724 284735
>>284647
>The Jew should humiliated and exposed for the rest of eternity
Imagine something like Horrible Histories except it just talks about different horrible things the Jews did, with a mix of lessons and skits and songs.
When I was a kid "Daylight come and we bomb your home" was commonly sang by edgy kids on busses until kids who had no idea what was going on joined in the choruses because bomb is a funny word.
So imagine a world where public transport becomes a place where the patriotic songs and anti-jew songs given to the public via some "Redpilled Histories" show are sang openly.
>>284648
I have no idea what any of this is but my instincts say I should hate it.
What the fuck is a greaser? Isn't that a "faggot gangster with motorcycles, Elvis hair, leather jackets, and switchblades" thing?
>>284653
"Celtic Monarchy"? Never heard of it, is that the "Good priests advise the king" system we're talking about? I like it.
Come to think of it, every corrupt monarch ever could have been stopped if there was a "Morally-good expert" caste keeping them in check and retaining the ability to eliminate/dethrone/replace them if necessary. Though for their words to have more power than the current ruler's, they would need some way to maintain dominance.
Perhaps a military force of their own?
The King could command the soldiers sworn to defend the kingdom from outside invaders and never turn their guns on the citizenry, but the Priests would control the internal police sworn to enforce the holy and scientifically-optimized laws.
Or the King could declare wars with other countries, while the Druid who's an expert in commanding soldiers would decide strategy when trying to win those wars. And also decide when it's necessary to sic the army on the current King, while another Druid Chief Of Police manages the cops.
This system would grant an immense amount of power to the Druids. Maybe too much? It would suck if jews infiltrated and subverted the druid caste.
Then again...
It's said that during the medieval era, priests could say the Bible said whatever the hell they wanted because most peasants either couldn't read, couldn't afford a bible of their own, or both.
A well-armed and morally-upright and politically-aware citizenry with access to the Druid Bible would know it says not to be jewish or subverted, so they could revolt against and take out corrupt Druids if the existing Druid Internal Investigators (DII, pronounced Die because that's fucking hilarious) didn't see any corruption and take care of that beforehand.

In the real world, if the cop violates the law by violating your asshole or doing some other terrible thing, the cops will investigate themselves and could easily declare that they did nothing wrong.
It would take a media circus and many armed people ready to riot and kill in the event of an obvious miscarriage of justice before the cops think they would need to do the right thing.
Under the law, there is no protection for those who commit self-defense and no protection for those who want to "purify the system" by killing the blatantly corrupt.
And that violates the idea that an armed citizenry is supposed to root out and stop corruption in the event that something becomes too corrupt.
Someone IRL could shoot the most obviously-corrupt piece of shit in the ruling class and would still have the book thrown at them unless they also got absolutely everyone else on that corrupt piece of shit's side.
There is no religious or moral basis for this world's nonsensical contradictory law systems, which most people don't even know. Only the absolute best lawyers are able to understand and navigate this clusterfuck of a law-weapon that's almost exclusively used against us, and only the smartest and most charismatic lawyers win frequently because while their job is supposed to be "law expert", they are just the best at making under-the-table deals or very good arguments for the judge to choose X interpretation of the fucked laws instead of any other interpretation. The law works on precedent except when it doesn't, because the law actually works on the whims of the highest judges and is not obligated to respect the rights of man or the rights guaranteed in the constitution.

That's one amendment America needs. The right for an angry white mob to eliminate corrupt higher-ups. It would be safe for a white country to have this right because there wouldn't be significant white-hating foreigner populations living in America ready to be weaponized by the media and jews. Instead, there would be heavily-armed redpilled whites who'd happily eliminate anyone who even suggested demographically subverting the nation or making a media empire industry out of lying to the people.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284660
284662 284735 284737
>>284655
>fuck the council of England
FUCK THE COUNCIL OF ENGLAND! And fuck Parliament, too. There are out-of-touch rich faggots born with their seats on parliament, they snooze their way through debates, and then they go to pubs with rich buddies they were supposed to have spent hours arguing against, all on the taxpayer's dime. Instead of doing anything for the people they represent, they enact the agendas of their rich friends and jewish overlords.
If this was ever meant to let the little guy elect someone to represent him and argue against the richest and most powerful, it has utterly failed.
A meritocratic system should protect the ideal of meritocracy by making the removal of those who lack merit moral/skill-wise as swift and efficient as possible. Does England even have a system for removing the corrupt from the parliament/council?
>>284655
>each person would need to be skilled in every department of politics, there would be a lot of clashing ideals and beliefs
Nope, specialization would ensure the Head "Make sure water and electricity flows to every tax-paying household" guy can't do anything about the "Make sure the trains run on time" guy or the "Make sure the cops are doing their job to enforce the laws" guy.
Nobody has any reason to fight with each other, or any ability to meddle with each other's work.
Each expert has their role specialized and their decisions made public, so it would be up to the armed citizenry to revolt against corruption or incompetence whenever it visibly arises.
I changed my mind about the police, police can no longer police the other aspects of government under this system.
Instead, the police would just be pawns that ensure no single individual breaks the speed limits or murders unjustifiably or rapes.
It would be up to large groups of citizens to say "This Chief of the department of water and power sucks so much that he needs to be beheaded, let's hope his replacement sucks less".
So for example, if the Chief of Water and electricity said "Vote for my buddy Seymour and make him the new regional governor of the north, or I'm cutting power to the entire north" or "I am cutting the power to any household that doesn't do what my friend at the department of health says you must do to combat le coronavirus" he would get hung, drawn, and quartered for it hard enough to put the fear of Druidism into him and his replacement.

So effectively, under this government system...
Meritocracy is the highest ideal
IQ, religious fervor for morality and rationality, physical fitness(?), family health(must encourage good men and women to breed more and create more healthy children after all), and economic good completed determines your class via merit
a constitutional republic has elected lawmakers govern local areas however they see fit, and the populace is free to travel and live wherever they want. The populace is also free to kill or forcefully remove their leaders in the event of corruption.
Small government in charge of the nation as a whole, Druid Caste of experts manages the main public needs individually and advises local governors.
Everything the govt does is public because the public should know all, Druids can call for the removal of corrupt governors/corrupt fellow druids but the public must be the one to go to the right time and place and pull the trigger if they agree with the Druid's argument, people can also make these arguments but whether a druid or non-druid makes them, only the best arguments will convince individuals to mob up and root out corruption
Your worth to the state and race as an individual encourages hard work and economic growth by rewarding you for these things, and any overworked cops/healthcare system would have to prioritize the most holy (the most good to the race and state) over the less holy.

ok wall over
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284662
284688 284737
>>284660
oh also when armed individuals get together to murder a politician, and then prove in a court of law that this was a justified act of removing corruption, it's called a Crusade.
When individuals kill someone and then it's proven in a court of law that they killed someone innocent, it's a False Crusade and there are hefty punishments for that.
However Crusades/FCs can only be done to those in govt. Can't do this to businessmen or singers you don't like, they get the standard "Accused of a crime, innocent until proven guilty" courts.

wall over, turning pc off
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284669
Spoilered
>>284654
>Beginner, Apprentice, Adventurer, Journeyman, Lord, Baronet, Baron, Viscount, Earl, Marquess, Duke, Master, Grand Master, that sort of thing
>Also a Peasant class. Kids are Beginners, but as they grow up they should rank up to Journeyman or be demoted to Peasant. The "Beginner" class is for under 16s only, a safety net that stops people from getting into the lowest class until they're legal adults.
It sounds very military but it reminds of me of how the Celtic society worked, to be a druid you had to first be a bard and to be a bard it required 7 years of practice in learning poetry and music, a druid required 21 years of practice (which is 7 times 3 because the bard is 7) of magic and justice, they also attended what were pretty much Celtic courts where the criminal was proven guilty or innocent and were then used as sacrifices if guilty, i think these rules of justice are better then letting nigger rapists and murderers rot slowly away while being fed in a prison with other blacks.
>This would be separate from any Titles anyone might have. Prince Jake from England could still just be a Baron in the ranking system.
This is good for a monarchy, the child of the king should not be allowed to lead if he is unworthy of the title of king.
>Having a higher rank would force public services like restaurants, hospitals, and the police forces to put your needs above the needs of those with lower ranks than you. Restaurants and nightclubs could choose to only serve those with high ranks, trains and planes could have VIP cars for those with high ranks only, and so on.
It's a cool concept but i think it becomes too complex, i do agree that there should be a couple of titles as there was many titles back in the Celtic society which gave more of a name or expressed what you have done, followers of Fionn were known as warriors/protectors and required you to undergo trials that decided if you were able to protect yourself as well as be versed in poetry that would require around 12 years of practice before becoming one, the Fenian's (Fian) had each individual leaders of groups of Fain of the provinces of Ireland that lived in forests with their family's and knew how to live of the land.
If you know what i have previously posted in other threads then you will know why i took a particular liking to that mare.
>Your personal ID card (needed to buy booze and prove your age) gets a nicer-looking background on it as your rank improves. A QR Code on your card can let anyone with the right tool or app check the online database to see what your rank really is, so forgeries become impossible.
I don't like living by cards and certificates but i guess the education system could ascribe these on their database with a backup storage or something instead of having a card that could go missing.
It sounds pretty authoritarian to have cards ascribed to everyone as every person in the nation would need to have a government certified card and this could be exploited down the line, maybe an insignia or armband made with a hard to fabricate material for each one with it's own personal logo would work better, a emblem of being a druid, a emblem of the bard and the emblem of a protector would work best as they make the most sense because they were important members of the Celtic society.
Better to have a logo instead of having your face on a card saying your name and birth date.

>Imagine a health service where a business owner, a worker, and a writer all pay the same for their health service. However the worker is prioritized over the writer and the business owner is prioritized over the worker, and all three are prioritized above the useless layabout unemployed chav who is still ranked above the immigrant, because the health service decides who the higher priorities must always be, triage-style.
>Having a high rank would make you more likely to get promotions in the workplace, force the cops to make protecting you and recovering your stolen property/avenging any crimes against you higher-priority than doing anything for those of lower castes, etc.
It seems like it would work if given enough depth, i think these sorts of allowances should be scaled by IQ instead of by titles, so niggers are at the bottom of the list for healthcare and should not be allowed weapons or fireworks if you are too much of dumb ass with an inferior monkey brain.
>Having a high class rank would improve your lot in life.
>A lifetime of good behaviour and hard work could let you enter bars and nightclubs for high-class citizenry only, or "have your pick of the litter" when it comes to choosing which lower-class woman to uplift and promote into becoming your property.
Hmm, this could work but you don't want to make too many titles as there would be way too many different types of handouts which could hamper the nations efficiency in creating a good economy.
Perhaps these sorts of titles would be given to you instead of diplomas by the education system and each different title would have it's own emblem.
>Low-class women can't divorce higher-class men unless they can prove criminal behaviour is going on in that home.
Ancient Celts had ceremony's in marriage which were conducted between two clans and increased each clans individual power.

I'm not go through the rest of this paragraph but i will say it has the potential to work.
>I don't think this system has been fully worked-out yet. It might have flaws. Still, it's an interesting in-progress idea.
I think it should be based on the Celtic titles as it has already been made for us, you only need to look to the past.
>A stratified class system that rewards those who provide more good to the state and white race via economic growth and hard work/time by placing their needs above those who do not do good for their people.
People too low on the list should be used as sacrifices.

Poem from Curragh of Kildare:
When the harvest moon began
After three years' span
Daily seeking victors praise
Rider raced through seven days
(Cont)
Anonymous
1552c7e
?
No.284688
284701
>>284662
>I changed my mind about the police, police can no longer police the other aspects of government under this system.
>oh also when armed individuals get together to murder a politician, and then prove in a court of law that this was a justified act of removing corruption

You need to sit down and really think about your ideas.
Anonymous
aed46cc
?
No.284689
>>284659
Its a wog, a guinea nigger, a goombah, a wop, an ~~Italian~~.
t. Italian.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284701
284777
>>284688
Why
Anonymous
2f88460
?
No.284716
>>284654
>Good little Uber-Druid (I can't think of a name for the religion) GermaUKMericans will get higher ranks than loudmouthed obnoxious atheist GermaUKMericans in this theoretical country.
I prefer the name Neo-druids.
This is the last time i reply to this post.
>>284656
>Didn't America initially have some kind of "New President every 20 years, no limits on the number of terms" system that got changed to "4 years per term, 2 terms tops" because some popular Republican kept getting to be in charge?
Not totally sure of this, i don't know everything about the history of the US because it is a foreign country and i prefer my own ancestors history.
>I like this idea a lot. It could work for a Constitutional Republic that had "the leader must have Druid values" as one of the Constitution's rules.
That could work, although druids were advisors of the kings as the kings were more skilled in combat than a druid but leaders or kings don't really need to be skilled in combat anymore so druids would make good leaders.
>Online schooling is innovating in ways the public schooling systems (((pozzed by the Jews and Unions))) could never dream of.
It's a lot easier to burn virtual books than real ones, although virtual ones take less time to create and there could be an archive on the education systems database with a couple of backups behind secure firewalls which when reset could keep all the data that was deleted so nothing can be lost.
Online schooling is easier since you don't need cement to make, 7 or 8 years old would be the best age to start online schools since that is when they start learning how to work with computers the best, a lot of kids play games at this age and understand the controls well.
>Thirty or more white kids can have their school experience ruined by one uppity negro child in this timeline, especially since teachers are trained to (and forced to) prioritize his feelings over actual education.
Bullies who are left to run rampant and protected by the school from harm are able to cause lots of disruption, they must be eliminated or taught that they are still subjected to discipline, without masculine order under a roof chaos soon ensues, it happens every time so it would be better to have it be online or in a Minecraft server where you are put in a glass box without being able to escape from learning about the 13%.
>Homeschooling bypasses this completely, other kids can not negatively impact your child's learning experience.
And that's why the parliament doesn't want kids to be home schooled because the parents are able to give their own bias and knowledge to their own children which is what (((they))) don't want as the lamb is able to be fed it's own parents knowledge without the government's power being able to intervene, the government has no authority over a child free from their clutches which eliminates the threat of being subverted and lied to.
>Bad teachers can abuse your child when you're not looking, or let your kid get abused by other kids and encourage things to remain this abusive via punishing any child who defends himself...
Every time i would beat the shit out of someone who threatened me i would be the one who was blamed for causing it, fucking cunts, do they not understand self defense? The only reason they didn't get broken noses was because i wasn't in my teens yet.
This schooling system and wherever the governments treacherous iron fist has authority is all completely backwards and all of them should be burned in a pit with each other.
>But a good homeschooling system (One that doesn't just get everyone together in a fucking skype call) lets any child learn at their own pace on their own time, meaning parents can watch their kids as they work and help them understand things if the need arises. Fewer uncontrolled variables.
Women should be able to stay at home and take care of her children while the man provides, the mothers of children should not be allowed to join the work force but a single women should be able to but with more personalized choices to choose from.
>In the current schooling system, "Civil servants" who hate you and kids raise your kids to hate you and love unions/communism/forcing the taxpayer to pay for everyone's overpriced tuition.
I hate how other people who have nothing related to your children teach them what to think and how to behave, the invention of schools was a total mistake and should be abolished and replaced with a better system.
>This would change under a free system where parents are free to chose the best education resources online for their kids.
Everything would change if people were given the freedom to make choices and forge their own beliefs without sociopaths being able to place their bias upon other peoples children.
>And if your school turns out to be a piece of shit, you can always sue the individual school and the teachers involved for being shit and wasting your child's time/poisoning your child's mind. Knowledge of this would quickly spread and no good parent would willingly send their kid to a shit school.
The school is used to go to shut down because it was that shit and has been replaced by another.
I think schools should be publicly humiliated as well for teaching false information and lies.

I won't reply to the next couple of lines because i agree with them and have nothing to add.
>This is unquestionably the superior system, it allows kids anywhere regardless of their physical location to learn anything they might need to rise wherever they want to go.
It's a lot better than what we have now, i would take anything over the current education system.
>>284657
>Plus, if the father works and the mother stays home, the mother could still aid in their child's education. Or schedule the education to take place when both parents are home and able to do their best to help their child.
That is what i have always thought education should be like.

(Cont)
Anonymous
2f88460
?
No.284724
284727
Aryan bananas.jpg
>>284657
>Finally, online education would make it easy for Human Resources faggots to check the work that gave their possible employees qualifications and doctorates or whatever, rather than hiring people based on personality and politics. This means Human Resourcefags would be expected to actually understand the field they're hiring people to work in, reducing the chance that incompetent manhaters end up deciding who works at a company and who doesn't.
People who want to teach their own bias should not be allowed in the education system.
>A system where men perform all the real work and manage all the real work, while women are allowed the easiest and most feel-good kinds of work that won't interfere with a man's work (writing, animating, singing, acting, making shit and selling it) seems like the best compromise between "Women should never work and be babymakers only" and "Women should be allowed to get in the way of working men".
Unmarried women should be able to work and married ones should stay at home, i agree that women being just baby makers is stupid and inefficient.
>There will be no women who waste their lives gossiping in offices as their eggs die out. No women who cheat and lie to climb higher up the corporate ladder. No campaigns to make women think they are owed the right to manage men and rule as tyrants when simple wholesome creative hobbies and motherhood are what really make women happy and mentally-stable in the long term
Women should not be allowed to procrastinate all day while men work, that is subjecting sexes and allowing one to indulge in laziness while another one sweats, they should work as it is better than being on their asses all day.
There should be places that wedded women are able to make friends but maybe only during the middle of the week, Wednesday or Thursday as it allows them to still spend time with their husbands on the weekend and maybe men should work longer hours on Wednesday and Thursday but have less hours on Friday to make up for the overwork.
>They will get to have easy work with little pressure to succeed, a hobby that gives them something to do besides joining and serving cults, and the chance of becoming world-renowned genius best-selling writers/animators/singers/whatever, but there will be no women in the military or office or government.
This sounds alright.

>The seams had to be created over time, under the nose of an under-informed and overly-trusting white public that at one point literally needed to be told via government-funded TV PSAs "OI, TEENAGE BOYS! DO NOT GET INTO THE CARS OF STRANGE MEN BECAUSE THEY MIGHT BE FAGGOTS WHO WILL RAPE YOU!!!".
Sure it was decay and subversion but the cracks were just big enough for shit to seep through, Jews shouldn't have been allowed into the USA nor should the immigration laws have been as relaxed as they were, that was America's fatal mistake and now we are here.
>Limits were placed on the elected while the (((professional politicians))) in the pockets of jews or jew megacorps got to rule unopposed for decades
That's why the government was so easily destroyed, capitalist monopoly's create too much power that no man should be able to hold, which creates way too big of a gap between the rich and middle class.
>Stupid and evil foreigners had to be imported to replace the white Americans and vote for corrupt liberals and jews offering free shit paid for by the taxpayer
First it was Germans and Scottish then Irish and the rest of the world after that, the Germans were both Aryan ones and Jews which is why there was Jews in America very early on.
Blacks were imported as slaves early on as well and i think they should have been shipped back to where they came from when slavery was abolished by Lincoln, he didn't realize the mistake he made and was not allowed to correct it and a small problem has now grown into America's main problem, if the Negros were shipped back to Africa then the mid west wouldn't have been set on fire with the rest of Europe being flooded with niggers that have no right in being here.
>>284659
>Imagine something like Horrible Histories except it just talks about different horrible things the Jews did, with a mix of lessons and skits and songs
This sounds very autistic but i guess it would work better with Aryanne being the main character that teaches the Jews lies, it would be pretty funny seeing Aryanne talking about everything the Jews did.
>When I was a kid "Daylight come and we bomb your home" was commonly sang by edgy kids on busses until kids who had no idea what was going on joined in the choruses because bomb is a funny word.
Kids are easily indoctrinated into joining something if other kids that do certain things are held as respected friends that do these actions, the upbeat aura that is created from something easily appeals to children and kids learn by copying other friends or parents.
>So imagine a world where public transport becomes a place where the patriotic songs and anti-jew songs given to the public via some "Redpilled Histories" show are sang openly.
A pony with a swastika is edgy enough to appeal to certain kids or teenagers.

>"Celtic Monarchy"? Never heard of it, is that the "Good priests advise the king" system we're talking about? I like it
Yes, the more accurate term is Gaelic monarchy or Irish monarchy, the kings or Ireland had multiple druids who advised him on legal matters and gave them wisdom, there was a chief druid who was pretty much the king's right hand man who he trusted very well, it reminds me of Hitler and the men he trusted, Rommel was pretty much Hitler's chief Fian, Himmler and Goebbels were his chief druids.
>Come to think of it, every corrupt monarch ever could have been stopped if there was a "Morally-good expert" caste keeping them in check and retaining the ability to eliminate/dethrone/replace them if necessary.
That was the purpose of making the king have advisors, a lot of bad kings weren't stopped as no one had the power to be able to.

(Cont)
Anonymous
1b10b45
?
No.284727
284737
lauren-southern-white-sharia-768x264.jpg
>>284724
>Unmarried women should be able to work and married ones should stay at home, i agree that women being just baby makers is stupid and inefficient.
Women at home actually work if they are busy rising the family. Unmarried women are "property" of the father and therefore any work activity is under the father or tutor' supervision.
Think about White Sharia.
Anonymous
2f88460
?
No.284732
>Though for their words to have more power than the current ruler's, they would need some way to maintain dominance.
>Perhaps a military force of their own?
The SS or SA were a good example of this, although we don't want something like the Roman Praetorian's as they should not be their own separate military organization as that would give them way too much control and power.
>The King could command the soldiers sworn to defend the kingdom from outside invaders and never turn their guns on the citizenry, but the Priests would control the internal police sworn to enforce the holy and scientifically-optimized laws
The priest's protectors of the lands should be called Fain fighters and the kings could be called Celtic crusaders or something like that.
>Or the King could declare wars with other countries, while the Druid who's an expert in commanding soldiers would decide strategy when trying to win those wars
It would be better to call the military commanders or police Fian as they were the protectors, not the druids.
>And also decide when it's necessary to sic the army on the current King, while another Druid Chief Of Police manages the cops
Maybe a chief Fian that controls other Fian which protect the people.
>This system would grant an immense amount of power to the Druids. Maybe too much?
That's why it would be better to recreate the Fian instead of calling every person with power a druid, the Fian were specifically skilled in fighting and protecting, they mastered the sword.
>It would suck if jews infiltrated and subverted the druid caste.
There should be a declaration of druidism of something similar which states that any attempt to subvert the Celtic way of justice shall be sent to the fire, it would not allow the way of justice to be changed
>It's said that during the medieval era, priests could say the Bible said whatever the hell they wanted because most peasants either couldn't read, couldn't afford a bible of their own, or both.
The priests have always been corrupt, Christianity is not the religion of my forefathers and the priests are false druids who preach lies instead of truth, they lied to the populace and anyone willing to expose them was hanged for being a 'heretic'.
>A well-armed and morally-upright and politically-aware citizenry with access to the Druid Bible would know it says not to be jewish or subverted, so they could revolt against and take out corrupt Druids if the existing Druid Internal Investigators (DII, pronounced Die because that's fucking hilarious) didn't see any corruption and take care of that beforehand.
Hmm, the idea of a druid bible has never been thought of before, a druid bible has never been created as the practices of old were kept secret which is what led to their downfall.
Maybe this idea could be expanded upon in the future.
Corrupt druids would easily become heretics as anyone attempting to withhold Judaic-Christian morals and beliefs shall be beheaded and preserved using ancient methods of skull preservation inside the king's castle.
The druids would make sense as being investigators as that is what they did during a Celtic trial.

>In the real world, if the cop violates the law by violating your asshole or doing some other terrible thing, the cops will investigate themselves and could easily declare that they did nothing wrong.
That's why the Fian should be essentially the police as the druids could investigate to see if their acts were justified or immoral.
These systems were already created for us but are waiting in the past to be rediscovered.
>It would take a media circus and many armed people ready to riot and kill in the event of an obvious miscarriage of justice before the cops think they would need to do the right thing.
That's why the modern system of justice does not work, too much reliance on the media for everything and the media is too easily taken control of.
>Under the law, there is no protection for those who commit self-defense and no protection for those who want to "purify the system" by killing the blatantly corrupt.
This system that the Jews have created is sickening and should be purged for the betterment of mankind, you cannot protect your own home from a nigger who besieges your castle.
>And that violates the idea that an armed citizenry is supposed to root out and stop corruption in the event that something becomes too corrupt.
The Fian are perfect for replacing the police, the citizens should be given individual freedoms as that is unchangeable, i agree with the original American gun laws but i am not a Libertarian, militias should be able to be created in the case of a full scale take over of the state.
>Someone IRL could shoot the most obviously-corrupt piece of shit in the ruling class and would still have the book thrown at them unless they also got absolutely everyone else on that corrupt piece of shit's side.
Many people are unjustifiably thrown in jail without committing any true offences, the police will abduct you from your own home and throw you in a cell if you are deemed to be causing too much of a stir.
>There is no religious or moral basis for this world's nonsensical contradictory law systems, which most people don't even know.
That's why it doesn't work, it has no solid foundation so everything is justifiable according to the current law.
>Only the absolute best lawyers are able to understand and navigate this clusterfuck of a law-weapon that's almost exclusively used against us, and only the smartest and most charismatic lawyers win frequently because while their job is supposed to be "law expert", they are just the best at making under-the-table deals or very good arguments for the judge to choose X interpretation of the fucked laws instead of any other interpretation.
The druids were the lawyers of the Celtic society so they already fit that role.
Law should be based from what is true and what is false, not how much something fits your ego or makes you happy, law should not be derived from emotions as emotions are not reliable.
Anonymous
2f88460
?
No.284735
>>284659
>The law works on precedent except when it doesn't, because the law actually works on the whims of the highest judges and is not obligated to respect the rights of man or the rights guaranteed in the constitution.
You should not be allowed to be a judge if you let your bias control you, a good judge should be completely unbiased as it allows for the complete justification of true law.

>That's one amendment America needs. The right for an angry white mob to eliminate corrupt higher-ups. It would be safe for a white country to have this right because there wouldn't be significant white-hating foreigner populations living in America ready to be weaponized by the media and jews.
A bible would be better suited for taking out people who go against the beliefs of the people, anyone who has power if found out to not have humanity's best interests at heart and instead wants power for selfish gain should be beheaded, it is a good symbol of justice to do this to them.
>Instead, there would be heavily-armed redpilled whites who'd happily eliminate anyone who even suggested demographically subverting the nation or making a media empire industry out of lying to the people.
The followers of Fionn should be the main military organization, they would defend the land from hostilities and ensure peace with the addition of righteous authority is brought upon these holy lands.
Anyone who goes against the goodwill of the people should suffer a unique death, either thrown to the flames or beheaded as both were used in the Celtic times, may our ancestors ways of justice be returned to the lands they once walked and the traitors be burned and beheaded for dishonoring these ancient traditions.
>>284660
>FUCK THE COUNCIL OF ENGLAND! And fuck Parliament, too.
I think this is the most based thing you have posted to date.
>There are out-of-touch rich faggots born with their seats on parliament, they snooze their way through debates, and then they go to pubs with rich buddies they were supposed to have spent hours arguing against, all on the taxpayer's dime.
Despicable demons who revel in total sin and go against the best interests of our people, i wish these people shall die in flames for everything they have done to the general populace, may their ways of life server as an example to us of what a total twat truly is.
>Instead of doing anything for the people they represent, they enact the agendas of their rich friends and jewish overlords.
They are the ultimate slaves of Satan, they enact the devil's wishes of destruction and they will pay dearly for it.
>If this was ever meant to let the little guy elect someone to represent him and argue against the richest and most powerful, it has utterly failed.
It was destined to fail from the very beginning and we shall be the bringers of new beginnings instead of letting false authority dominate us.
>A meritocratic system should protect the ideal of meritocracy by making the removal of those who lack merit moral/skill-wise as swift and efficient as possible.
Only the strong shall prevail, the weak shall be left to rot in the past and forgotten forever.
>Does England even have a system for removing the corrupt from the parliament/council?
No, absolutely none, this system was created to enslave us when it was first designed, there is not a gram of goodness in this diabolical system.

>Nope, specialization would ensure the Head "Make sure water and electricity flows to every tax-paying household" guy can't do anything about the "Make sure the trains run on time" guy or the "Make sure the cops are doing their job to enforce the laws" guy.
Alright then, it seems like it would work theoretically,
>Nobody has any reason to fight with each other, or any ability to meddle with each other's work.
There is no reason for the druid of toilets to start shit with the Fian, yeah they wouldn't really have any basis to argue over as each person in power should be there for individual, separate reasons, all for the benefit of the masses.
>Each expert has their role specialized and their decisions made public, so it would be up to the armed citizenry to revolt against corruption or incompetence whenever it visibly arises.
The government should be a public one instead of a secret one, we all know what the illuminated Illuminati is and we all know it isn't here to help us.
>I changed my mind about the police, police can no longer police the other aspects of government under this system.
>Instead, the police would just be pawns that ensure no single individual breaks the speed limits or murders unjustifiably or rapes.
There should be specific branches of law enforcement, each one with a higher degree of authority, so that if one branch becomes corrupted another can purge it, like an onion with multiple layers.
>It would be up to large groups of citizens to say "This Chief of the department of water and power sucks so much that he needs to be beheaded, let's hope his replacement sucks less"
The citizens should be able to decide which branch of Fionn followers takes it's place, each state in America has it's own different type of law establishment and maybe this could be copied as the citizens could decide which one would be best but the rest of the different law enforcers would have their own amendment to each county, maybe each different city in England could have it's own different style of law, each one following the old ways of that town or city.and enacts in the best wishes of those specific citizens of each town, many places have slightly different concepts of law and the citizens should be able to decide which one is best for them, this way Carlisle could have the same laws as Birmingham and Glasgow could have the same rules as Edinburgh but each city's rules would be different and separate from each other but still following similar beliefs in line with the government, a City's Fain would be more powerful than a town's Fain.

(Cont)
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284736
284737 284744
Perhaps taking the "Woman as property" thing to the extreme would work best.
Women become the property of their fathers, to be given away to good men.
No rights for women... That sounds good to me.
After all they've done to white men, they deserve this or worse.
I was thinking a "Women can pretend to work if they want" system would let them feel important and result in more creative things. It would let them be productive, contribute a little to society, have fun with the girly creative jobs that make them feel like A Creative(TM), without ever getting in the way of real work society needs. Then again, has anything made by a woman ever turned out good without the involvement of at least one man? Certainly not good enough to single-handedly justify women in the workplace.
Remember how shit Faust's "DC Supergirls" show was? She had more control over that than she ever had over FIM.
I'm sick of the consoomer mindset in 99% of women. No thought goes into what they enjoy. Nothing intellectually separates a female fan of one piece of media from another besides the media itself. I've had intellectual discussions with men. With women? Good fucking luck trying to get her to understand anything intellectual or put her thoughts in any kind of deep-sounding way when they often begin and end at "I like Transformers and I want to fuck Optimus Prime".
Why do retarded women love saying the godawful and often-pozzed degenerate romance novels pumped out by shameless men and women to be gobbled up by low-IQ women with too much disposable income are "True art on par with the greatest books and films of all time" solely because they made money?
You see the same shit from wamen who claim making up most of the player base of mobile "games" like Candy Crush and Clash of Clans and Gacha Game Roulette: Gambling For JPEGs with Daddy's Credit Card means they're more real gamers than any of the men who founded entire competitive fighting game subcultures on their own while the TV insisted video games made you a pathetic nerd or unstable and woman-hating and violent.
If shit like Fifty Shades of Gray and Twilight and "My Secret Black Lovers: I Wandered Into A BDSM Rape Orgy And Cheated On My Husband With Thirty Niggers" is on the same level as genuine literary masterpieces like 1984 and Sherlock Holmes just because trash for women makes a shitload more money than world-renowned culture-changing literature, then Women's WWE is a more "real" sport than Women's Football because WWE makes more money than women's football.
Christ, by that feministically money-obsessed logic the FIFA Franchise is more "artistically valid" than Undertale because FIFA makes more money.
Keeping women in "Individual creative jobs only" would keep them competing with one another, and keep them from infesting companies and dragging them down with bullshit drama. It would also keep their projects small-scale. You would never see advertisements shill shitty women's media just because a woman made it.
But purely restricting women to a "Seen and fucked but not heard, baby-makers only" role would result in more white births and looking at demographic trends, white people need that more than whatever books a woman might one day write and typically publish under a man's name once again.
I can't see women accepting the role they belong in without a fight, but I also can't see them putting up much of a fight if it truly does come to this. I've seen some "like totally redpilled" MAGA women take selfies all day while claiming to be redpilled traditional family women, but I haven't seen enough of them to be impressed.
I worked in retail once, so I can tell you: If women can choose between doing their job efficiently, and putting way more time and effort into trying to make someone else do their jobs even if it fucks others over, they will always choose the latter. They are greedy holes who will always put the possibility of attaining more for less and getting le good feels over thinking morally/reasonably.
Women should not have the ability to kill their countries with bad votes. Voting is an act of force and a woman's worthless wishy-washy opinion should not have more force than the vote of a male worker, male business owner, male soldier, male Neo-Druid, or male captain of industry. Women should not have the ability to spread their retarded opinions across the world faster than men can debunk them.

As for the religion...

How should "Celtic Neo-Druidism but for the GermaUKMericans" work? Would it have a Bible? Extra Testaments? Would it ever reform? Would Nazism influence it? What would the religion say? If Jesus was born in GermaUK in a celtic society, how would he and his Testament reshape the religion?
Would there be set-in-stone commandments like "Though shalt not commit rape" and "Thou shalt not commit homosex", or would individuals who follow the religion be told to interpret "Be good to your race and focus on reality and the natural world" however they see fit?
Anonymous
2f88460
?
No.284737
284738
leslie fair memri tv.png
>>284660
>So for example, if the Chief of Water and electricity said "Vote for my buddy Seymour and make him the new regional governor of the north, or I'm cutting power to the entire north" or "I am cutting the power to any household that doesn't do what my friend at the department of health says you must do to combat le coronavirus" he would get hung, drawn, and quartered for it hard enough to put the fear of Druidism into him and his replacement.
There should be different chiefs for different regions or City's so that one chief could not have too much control over a region.

>Meritocracy is the highest ideal
That's okay.
>IQ, religious fervor for morality and rationality, physical fitness(?), family health(must encourage good men and women to breed more and create more healthy children after all), and economic good completed determines your class via merit
I still don't really like the good citizen certificates, it reminds me a lot of China which makes it sound like a authoritarian/communist idea.
>a constitutional republic has elected lawmakers govern local areas however they see fit, and the populace is free to travel and live wherever they want. The populace is also free to kill or forcefully remove their leaders in the event of corruption.
The leaders must first be proven to be corrupted first, we can't have every leader being killed because he didn't suit the public optics.
Being able to live wherever you want must first be decided if you are worthy of living where you want.
>Small government in charge of the nation as a whole, Druid Caste of experts manages the main public needs individually and advises local governors.
That's good.
>Everything the govt does is public because the public should know all, Druids can call for the removal of corrupt governors/corrupt fellow druids but the public must be the one to go to the right time and place and pull the trigger if they agree with the Druid's argument, people can also make these arguments but whether a druid or non-druid makes them, only the best arguments will convince individuals to mob up and root out corruption
It must be proven in a court of truth as to whether or not the person is doing it for his personal gain or for the cause.
>Your worth to the state and race as an individual encourages hard work and economic growth by rewarding you for these things, and any overworked cops/healthcare system would have to prioritize the most holy (the most good to the race and state) over the less holy.
It would work but it would get pretty complicated quickly and would need careful planning, do not rush into this and make untrue judgement's
>>284662
>oh also when armed individuals get together to murder a politician, and then prove in a court of law that this was a justified act of removing corruption, it's called a Crusade.
It would sound better to call it a purge, as you are purging the weak by ridding the government of leaches.
>When individuals kill someone and then it's proven in a court of law that they killed someone innocent, it's a False Crusade and there are hefty punishments for that.
Perhaps call it a misguided crusade.
>However Crusades/FCs can only be done to those in govt. Can't do this to businessmen or singers you don't like, they get the standard "Accused of a crime, innocent until proven guilty" courts.
Why can't i start a crusade against some nigger rapper?
My freedoms are being invoked if i can't behead a nigger.
>>284727
I don't like white sharia as it is foreign ideas applied onto my own people and between different races, i prefer the way the Celts treat their women as it is more close to home.
>>284736
Oh shit not again, as soon as i am about to finish.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284738
haha cum.jpg
>>284737
>Oh shit not again, as soon as i am about to finish
That's what she said!
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284744
284756
>>284736
I am not going to write a lot about women because i don't really want to give a full detailed description of my opinion of them because this is kind of going off topic.
They are easily dissuaded from things as they follow their emotions rather than their brain, they are predesignated to think with part of their brain, anyone who preaches equal rights for women is promoting that the unconscious is the same as the conscious which is completely false.
Yes if they are allowed to dominate then they will take that opportunity by the throat and exploit other people if it suits their feelings.
I prefer mares honestly as i have had better experiences with them, at least mares haven't been subverted..

>How should "Celtic Neo-Druidism but for the GermaUKMericans" work? Would it have a Bible? Extra Testaments? Would it ever reform? Would Nazism influence it? What would the religion say?
I don't like the idea of a bible as it copies from Christianity, it would be more of a declaration of a return to our roots than a bible, Nazism would influence it in political ideas and the expectation of men, the preaching of masculinity would be the main take from national socialism and also Hitlers view of economics would be taken as well as the exposing of Jews.
>If Jesus was born in GermaUK in a celtic society, how would he and his Testament reshape the religion?
I don't fucking know, Jesus probably would have preached truth which is what the Celts liked, there was not very much he probably would have disagreed with, the Celts already knew that god is inside the spirit of men as that is the reason they knew a lot about the spiritual world because it was already all known to them but is now forgotten.
Are you asking if Jesus came with his Christian Testaments or with a new one?
>Would there be set-in-stone commandments like "Though shalt not commit rape" and "Thou shalt not commit homosex"
Basically a re implementation of old beliefs and traditions, rape should only be taken seriously if the women is unmarried, gay sex should only be taken seriously if it is promoted by someone as that is subversion which is worthy of burned for.
>or would individuals who follow the religion be told to interpret "Be good to your race and focus on reality and the natural world" however they see fit?
That's a pretty good quote, that should be the main motto of it.

Here's a prophecy about the end of times from the Morrigan at the end of "The Second Battle Of Moytura", it reminds me of the world nowadays.
I shall not see a world
Which will be dear to me
Cattle without milk
Women with no modesty
Men without courage
Conquests with no king
Woods without oak-mast
Sea without produce
False judgments of aged men
False pleadings of lawyers
Every man a traitor
Every son dishonorable
Families will succumb to incest
An evil time
Son will cheat his father
Daughter will deceive.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284756
284758
>>284744
You're right.
You know what's hard about writing historical fiction books?
If your country is too perfect, there are no opportunities to give your protagonist a miserable life to make the audience root for him.
Though I guess the heroes taking part in some "Final battle" with a big white country VS a big jewish slave-loving nigger empire" would make a great story.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284758
284762
bright with moonlight.jpg
>>284756
>If your country is too perfect, there are no opportunities to give your protagonist a miserable life to make the audience root for him.
You can design it however you want, just don't throw in 5 paragraphs about white sharia or some shit like that, not a lot of people would want to read a giant section on how women are fuck puppets and why.
>Though I guess the heroes taking part in some "Final battle" with a big white country VS a big jewish slave-loving nigger empire" would make a great story.
Like i wrote before, it would be a supreme one of a kind Nigel wet dream.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284762
284767
>>284758
Do you think I'll have to tone down the "most shocking parts" of an all-white nazi druid nation's rise to becoming the dominant global power? It's already something the normies will be told to stay away from.
Then again I could make the story immensely wholesome to fuck with people.
A heartwarming tale of a father and son struggling to connect, except the background is the ultimate white nation (that I can currently think of, still taking suggestions on ways to make this even better)

>nigel wet dream
speaking of which, my nigel wet dream story derailed on what seemed like a short detour at the time and my story isn't even about humans any more, it's about a genetically-engineered new pony-inspired species who could drown all of Star Trek, Star Wars, and WH40K in supreme bullshit and then wipe their asses with Chakats.
fuck Chakats, they fucking suck
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284767
aryanne's favorite story.png
>>284762
>Do you think I'll have to tone down the "most shocking parts" of an all-white nazi druid nation's rise to becoming the dominant global power?
Depends, who exactly are you trying to appeal to with this story? Are you trying to appeal to right wing readers or normal's? If you are trying to the general readers then you will have to rewrite pretty much everything, it's not worth the time trying no appeal to normal fags anyway.
You would have a hard time getting this published anywhere if you want it made into a book, maybe it would best to make it in pdf format before attempting to get it published as a lot of book company's are pretty Jewish or owned are subverted and left leaning, so it would best to keep yourself anonymous to stop any backlash from occurring, you don't want to be mugged by Tyrone on the streets because you are known for publishing the most right wing leaning fictional story in the modern era next to the diary of Anne frank.
>It's already something the normies will be told to stay away from.
That is good, less attention coming your way is ideal if you are gonna make the choice of actually going through with this idea.
>Then again I could make the story immensely wholesome to fuck with people.
It's your choice.
>A heartwarming tale of a father and son struggling to connect, except the background is the ultimate white nation (that I can currently think of, still taking suggestions on ways to make this even better)
I would recommend calling the main character Nigel for shits and giggles, maybe he is the leader or king of this nation or a prominent figure next to the ruler.

>wet dream
Mine would be a modern age return to ancient roots where everyone is given free mares if they want, it would teach lonely men how to court women, a mare won't give herself to you if you are too pushing or she doesn't trust you, which is a good way to learn how to become a gentleman, every lonely man must prove his worth by courting a mare before being allowed to marry a woman as it would prove he is capable of being trusted by the opposite sex and having a mare is a good way of keeping depression at bay because it triggers a lot of receptors in the brain which can cause an attachment to them.
Bestiality should be allowed but gay bestiality should be extremely frowned upon, as long as it is the opposite of your sex then it shouldn't be punished because there is nothing really bad about it if both parties are consenting.
Anonymous
1552c7e
?
No.284777
284780 284781
>>284701
>police can't police government
>prove in a court of law
The last redpill very few have chosen to take is that police are an extension of the courts and the courts are an extension of the police.

In your system, if the people were to kill loyalists and the court was comprised of loyalists, then the people would be guilty even if their actions were righteous.
What you describe is no different than every government which we live under today, which means it would succumb to the same elements.
Anonymous
ff36f03
?
No.284780
check'em.png
>>284777
Check those trips.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284781
284835
1559381844625.png
>>284777
>The last redpill very few have chosen to take is that police are an extension of the courts and the courts are an extension of the police.
The courts and law should be decided by the state's own people, the majority should be in control of the law, not the minority as the law should no longer govern the rights of people and with the world's most wealthiest in charge of the law then obviously they will change it to better themselves as human desires are very selfish which always leads to the want of the preservation of ones wealth as humans are generally unwilling to go through with change of their personal lives without resisting or attempting to prevent that from happening.

The government should exist to decide what is best for people, not to decide what they should think or feel about things, that is for only themselves to decide, the government should cater to the wants and needs of people instead of themselves, the modern system of justice does the very opposite of this and instead prioritizes their own selfish needs and wants in favor of the general populace, they live by their own morals instead of catering to morals of the masses which is why it fails along with a couple other egotistical beliefs of the government that cause the law to be lacking.
>In your system, if the people were to kill loyalists and the court was comprised of loyalists, then the people would be guilty even if their actions were righteous.
That's why the people should be in control of the law, there should be a vote as to whether or not someone is guilty or not instead of the decision of a judge who applies his own bias of morals and law onto whether someone is guilty or innocent.
If a serial rapist is given trial then the public should decide what happens to him, not the judge.
>What you describe is no different than every government which we live under today, which means it would succumb to the same elements.
This, we have to change the system as it was created to give power to the government which is wrong for a multitude of reasons.
Nice trips.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284814
284832
I had an idea.
Courts have "Juries", groups of the public gathered together to help vote on whether they think the accused is innocent or not.
Judges can overrule their decisions (I think? I remember one music-related case where a judge called his jury a bunch of retards for not saying what the copystriker wanted to hear)
anyway
these days, why gather 12 pre-selected people into a room (and intentionally rig juries by filling the jury of a man accused of rape with rape victims and family members of rape victims and feminists and making sure one person on the jury can make pro-guilty-no-matter-what arguments) when instead, many more people could be gathered together online at random and made to vote near the trial's end without any interaction between the jury members?
Anonymous
1ab613c
?
No.284832
>>284814
>the law is your own
>random strangers judge you
You should be judged by the community you live in and the communities you belong to.

"A jury of your peers"
This is another example of how the "justice" system is flawed.
Lets say you commit copyright infringement by posting copies of images on a mongolian yurt enthusiast forum.
Who would your "jury of peers" be? A 50 year old who only uses facebook on her iphone 50 that you live next to, or someone who also posts on that forum?

The answer is obvious if you've listened to "The Green Mountaineer"
Anonymous
2f9ca69
?
No.284835
284876
>>284781
>That “History of the World: Part 1” reference in pic related
Sauce?
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284876
>>284835
I got the image from a thread on /pone/ if i remember, i don't actually know which comic it is from.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284927
284939 284982
What would be a good name for the Druid GermaUKMerica country?
Anonymous
afa8460
?
No.284939
284956
>>284927
Das interkontinentale Weltreich should be called Whitetopia
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.284956
284982
>>284939
That sounds like the name of a theme park where each main rollercoaster is themed after a method of transportation we invented, every stage production and film played on the park's cinema is pro-white, and all the food available is healthy and delicious stuff we invented.
I was thinking something more mythical in origin would work better.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.284982
285013
>>284927
>>284956
>I was thinking something more mythical in origin would work better.
What kind of "mythical" are you wanting? Something tied to mythology or history?
What kind of name are you wanting exactly?
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.285013
>>284982
Maybe something from celtic or german mythology. A name they would give to the "new continent" of America.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.285038
285040 285070
America was initially named after Amerigo Vespucci (or so I was told) so if a Druidic GermaUKian got there first and started colonizing it ahead of schedule it could get any kind of name.
Perhaps something based on Arthurian legend. Then again would the King Arthur stories exist in this world? What stories and mythical places existed before this? It would be funny if America was named Lemewria and got a cat on its flag. But at the same time that's kind of retarded.

Not sure how Druid GermaUK would exist ethnically. Would it be a five-way United Kingdom combo culturally dominated by celtic druidism, or would there be some combination Anglo-Germano-Saxon fuckery? I want maximum whiteness under the best religion.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.285040
>>285038
today I remembered Lemuria came from a disproved scientific theory put forward in 1864 by zoologist Philip Sclater, he thought Lemurs exist somewhere because of a lost continent full of lemurs. Lemewria was a joke I thought of the first time I learned this decades ago.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.285070
285118
>>285038
How about Luguvalium? It is an old name for Carlisle which means "fortress of Lugus".
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.285118
285119 285414
>>285070
Would open itself up to too many Valium jokes.
How about Albion? It's the name of mythical old england and similar to Albain (What many cultures call England) so the name Albion would be great for America itself.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.285119
>>285118
Sure you can call it whatever you want, it's your story after all so you could even call it something like Britanneigha.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.285406
285414
But if GermEngland had its name changed, what would they call America?
"Vespuccia"?
"New Albion"?
"Manifesdestinia"?
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.285414
285428
bane poster.jpg
>>285406
>>285118
How about England is called Albain and America is called Albion?
>Albain
>Bane
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.285428
285433
>>285414
I like the banepost but would Germans be cool with the name Albain or would they want something like Gotterdamerungshweiz?
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.285433
285434
>>285428
Maybe something along the lines of greater Gaul, it is an extension of the druids realm of land so it fits well, there is mot very many names you could give a Germany that follows the druid faith so it would be better to call it something like that.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.285434
285510
>>285433
Alright, the UK island's called Albain and Germany's called Greater Gaul. America's named Albion.
I saw this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67KquSGGfGI
and it made me wonder how much better America's colony-owning would go for Albion since "Conquer all of Africa for its resources and land, and to reduce the global nigger supply" is one of its goals.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.285510
285514
>>285434
>and it made me wonder how much better America's colony-owning would go for Albion since "Conquer all of Africa for its resources and land, and to reduce the global nigger supply" is one of its goals.
You could use the reasoning of maybe that America wanted to colonize the land the Arabs didn't want to harvest in Africa so that could have started a war between them, perhaps they would have fought sometime in the late 1800's like the English did in the Zulu war, so maybe the war between the Arabs and Americans could have replaced the war between the English and the bongo's.
I already suggested that the Arabs be in control of Africa as they would be interested in nigger slaves so "Albion" could be in control of South Africa instead for cultivation purposes, there is lots of fertile land around cape town and the fruit is easily farmed as there is lots of produce in Africa that the niggers don't know how to farm, fucking Negros.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.285514
285516
mapchart.png
>>285510
So the whites of Albion get South Africa and northern africa goes to the Arabic Jewish Russian slave-trading Evil Empire?
Sounds good to me, how does this map look?
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.285516
286285
1576958080069.png
>>285514
Hmm, maybe the Norse country's could have stayed as their own independent nations they haven't been Christianize'd because Christianity would have less power in Europe as the druids managed to keep their traditions alive so the Norse pagans would be constantly waging war against the northern part of Russia through Finland, the vikings would have invaded Russia instead of Britannia as there would be no Christians to plunder so they would have turned to the more fatter Jews Russian Jews, the Nordic way of conquering would have them control eastern Canada (Quebec would be snow nigger instead of frog) as well as the tip of the dick of Scandinavia with Iceland and Greenland being under their thumb.
The Celts and Norse could have driven Christianity out of Europe together and rid Rome of the phony pope's that preach lies instead of truth then there could have been a declaration of peace within the walls of the Vatican that would have stated how Christianity is inferior to our ancestors way of life and that they wish to replace it.
Also what the fuck did you do to Thailand? Worst Korea would be a better place for Asian man pussy to be.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.286285
286293 286307
I was thinking about the "Women stay at home working services instead of doing real work" policy.
It keeps women home, gives single women something to do all day, and encourages them to learn skills that will be useful when they marry and give up their businesses.
Professional tailors, professional bakers... Who wouldn't want to marry one of those?

It leaves all the hard labour jobs AND the important intellectual jobs open for men who deserve them
When women get married, they will be socially encouraged to stop working and start raising babies.
Women who focus too much on their careers will be seen as greedy dirtbags with no thought for their future children
Plus, good men will be able to tell women who are good with money apart from retard women who spend like there's no tomorrow and have no concept of worth by looking at whose business does better and who ends up in debt to the state's only bank.
Laws forbidding women from hiring others prevents businesses from growing too big and taking up other women, because when women hire others they love trying to delegate all of their tasks and responsibilities to others, even if this takes more effort than just doing their work themselves.

After all these years with women in the workplace...
I think women have permanently brainwashed themselves into thinking working women=good. Economist faggots have been saying it for too long.
Men will be happy to never have to deal with women in offices or administration or academia again. But women... They'd have to be forced into their proper role for a generation or two until society becomes sane again.
It would be easy to convince women taking a "Services only" role in society will make them happier than "big men jobs" ever could. It would keep their idle hands too busy for satanic feminist bullshit.
It would discourage men from spoiling their daughters and ruining her standards for how men should treat women.
And it would prepare women for something more important than their careers: how good a housewife they can be.

Women work for themselves to impress men until one impresses a man enough to make him decide to impress her. Then they marry and have lots of babies, and she's a good mother because being a shit mother is literally illegal.
Giving women servile roles means they'll encounter more men. Attractive and kind waitresses and maids and bakers will be seen by more people, for example.
Women can still impress men in the usual ways, this just replaces online dating for women. Online dating was a mistake, it gives women access to a neverending supply of low-test males to exploit and get pampered by until her ego makes her unfuckable.

Also, imagine something like Hitler Youth but even better, and it teaches boys everything they need to succeed in society and become men while teaching girls everything they need to become good housewives and real women. That would help.

>>285516
I don't know anything about Thailand besides the jokes about "ladyboys", young men who dress like girls so men will buy them drinks and make them feel wanted.
If there's more to the country than that, sorry. But with India enlightened, Bollywood is no longer Jewed. Where can the Jews produce shit movies from now?
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.286293
fashwave 1.jpg
>>286285
>All that shit about 3DPD bitches
I think that masculinity should be the main motto of this society because that is what the ancients held high, the Celts were not pussy's, they had both female druids and male but femininity was not seen as equal to male so it has been subverted to be seen as a form of quality which it is not, the religion of the Celts did not acknowledge feminine nature as it was seen as a hinder to their way of life to put both sexes into separate category's, it worked well and that's what matters the most because women were encouraged to be more masculine and tough, they didn't promote femininity and masculinity together for they ignored femininity altogether so that their culture could conquer, women knew how to fight and there is references to female queens in old Irish mythology but they were never seen as better than kings.

The structure of the society you have created follows Christian morals instead of Celtic, so if you really want to have it follow druid morals then this form of separation should between the sexes should be abolished in favor of masculinity, that is if you really want it to be a pagan society.
Paganism promotes masculine and mother ship roles, that is why there is clear distinctions between certain gods, you do not hear of a prominent female viking god because they are seen as weak, the Celts acknowledged the motherliness of the earth and the necessary aspects of manliness in animals, the wolf and horse are a good example of this sort of hierarchy.
>Also, imagine something like Hitler Youth but even better, and it teaches boys everything they need to succeed in society and become men while teaching girls everything they need to become good housewives and real women. That would help.
It would work pretty well as Hitler youth groups were a form of old Aryan teachings of being strong for the purpose of being good, his movement contains knowledgeable references to our people's old ways and i support these upholding's of Aryan teachings as i base my beliefs from my ancestral roots.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.286307
>>286285
>I don't know anything about Thailand besides the jokes about "ladyboys", young men who dress like girls so men will buy them drinks and make them feel wanted.
Huh i think i heard that a long time ago but forgot about it, i don't think i have ever heard a joke about that, i know next to nothing about most Asian country's other than India, China and Japan.
>If there's more to the country than that, sorry. But with India enlightened, Bollywood is no longer Jewed. Where can the Jews produce shit movies from now?
I don't give a fuck about Thailand so you can do whatever to it, it would probably be best for Moscow or Leningrad to be the cold version of Hollywood and Stalingrad to be the capital, or if you would want it to be in a hotter place it could be made somewhere in Egypt or Israel.

You don't have to have woman's roles completely changed to be pagan but it would make the most sense given that you are basing this society from the druids.
Anonymous
0d7b4d1
?
No.286321
286349
Nations.png
>>279956
I had no idea what I was going for, but I enjoyed it nonetheless
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.286349
Map of Minecraft.png
Okay i finally decided to make my own after all this time, this took quite a while because i'm quite finicky with exact details, this is peak aesthetic for me.
>>286321
Seems alright.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.286379
286381
What do the pagans think women's roles should be?
Should they be "Babymakers and stay-at-home mothers only" or should they be expected to be more/less?
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.286381
286382
>>286379
>What do the pagans think women's roles should be?
They were usually seen as mothers of children but if they excelled in a specific area then they would be allowed to partake in what interested them but most ordinary women were encouraged to know how to fight, i am basing this from the Celtic perspective of them but the vikings saw them as pure cum catchers whose sole purpose was to get fucked, the Celts allowed women to become druids if they were able to undergo the process of becoming one, women are able to become wise in certain forms of magic to a certain extent but there was usually no distinction made between the sexes, no one was preferred over the other generally but most Celtic women were maidens or mothers, the men would provide food for them typically.
>Should they be "Babymakers and stay-at-home mothers only" or should they be expected to be more/less?
Huntresses were a thing but most of the time it would be the daughter of a mother who would provide food for their brothers and sisters, the modern world doesn't need those anymore though so they would probably be either female druids, maidens or mothers. There's not a lot you could do with a modern Celtic woman other then that.
If they were skilled in a certain area then they were encouraged to pursue what they are good at, if they were a normal woman then they would just be waiting for a man to come for them.
Daughters of high class were usually held high as well, sons and daughters of druids were given a higher priority rather than a nobleman's children, it makes sense given druids had a higher degree of teaching then a nobleman so thus they had a higher IQ and better genes.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.286382
>>286381
>most of the time it would be the daughter of a mother who would provide food for their brothers and sisters,
*Son of a mother
Other then then that it would be the father, everyone contributed to the well being of the family.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.286410
286432 286446 286501

I keep trying to think about what life would be like in new-America. How would education, job opportunities, and home life go? How would it respond to the Cold War, or the birth of smartphones? How would it handle Vietnam and the Middle East? Would it allow the Jew Empire to exist/get nukes? Would it invest in solar-laser space superweapon shit to get a radioactivity-free superweapon option?
Would things from our history happen in this world? How would they change and reshape it?
Would new-America become "A better druidic land" or would it become less religious over time?

And that "Australian Ascendancy" idea... I once saw a video that claimed we could easily turn all of Australia green and fertile, making it a food-producing economic powerhouse with shitloads of land you can live on, if we just made an artificial river in the middle of the desert. And the only reason why people haven't done it already is a mix of "Hurr durr muh aboriginals uwu" and "Hurr durr what about the lizards in the desert whose habitat we would destroy with this operation?"
as if they can't just have a suitably small yet sustainable number of them put in zoos with the rest of the irrelevant animals forgotten by evolution. Am I talking about one or the other? Yes.
I think a world of smarter redpilled white people would see through this bullshit and turn Australia green. Perhaps early into the colonization project. Also instead of a penal colony it would be a proper attempt at fully taking over and settling and reshaping this land.
I still think it's hilarious that Australia, a fucking penal colony made of people the UK didn't want, ended up doing better than any nigger country out there because even criminal whites (without decades of commie brainwashing) still have the capacity to be better than niggers.

Not to mention Japan. I forgot to put it on the map last time but they tried a coup before Japan fully unified, the coup happened when a lot of them went Christian but it failed. People in Japan loved Christianity for freeing them from the commie-like hyper-authoritarian pseudo-religion of Confucianism. The religion "gave them a soul" and told them there was more to life than serving your boss. In this timeline, I can see Albion/Albain trying harder to spread their Druidism and helping out a lot in the event of a coup and post-coup modernization. How would this reshape their culture, country, and place in the world? Would they be forced to pay debts to Albion/Albain for the help? Would they be a military ally? When would they conquer China? (I don't like China and I want Japan or USA to conquer it in this timeline)

If this world's got more high-IQ whites and a culture that says controlling and limiting govt authority is good, would everyone get gun rights in "America"? Would the best military grade weapons be restricted to druids and the military only?
Would all those high-IQ whites respond to failing and flawed institutions by replacing them with superior alternatives once the technology to replace them is available, resulting in the replacement of public/private schooling with a mix of solo online education and clubs kids attend during monday-friday for specific topics and interests, while overly-expensive private schooling becomes a dying institution exclusively for the richest of the rich?
Where would it fall on a scale of Capitalism to Protectionism?

Every single detail about this world... It's just as foreign to me as the idea of living in an old American sitcom with strong masculine responsible admirable fathers, kind stay-at-home mothers who actually cook for you, no niggers, and an actual community to live in.
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.286432
286443 286446
1576787064112.png
>>286410
>I keep trying to think about what life would be like in new-America. How would education, job opportunities, and home life go?
Education would be something more or less exclusive to built up towns and villages city's would simply not exist as teaching towns would replace them, every person would contribute to their village, everyone knows everyone so no more built up scum city's where evil is left to breed because every single time a large industrial place is erected Jews flock to it, so in order for a good life to exist the city slickers wouldn't exist because the only people who have an influence on the nation are wealthy assholes so wealthiness would be extremely subject to specific people who actually deserve wealth, druids would have a life of luxury so others would aspire to be like them.

Most people would live in villages close to a outer circle where the most important village's chieftains and druids would meet with the other surrounding county's chieftains and druids so that plans could be discussed with the villages around the area with the people's interest being the main thing in mind, there would be clan druids who would meet with the king at annual points throughout the seasons, once they would meet at the new moon every 3 moons so that no messages would be needed in order for them to know when, at the new moon and full moon so basically once every two weeks, there would be a chieftain for every major village who would meet with the village's druids to discuss in the center of the town in front of the locals so that no funny business could occur so that the commoners would know what they are striving towards but the only people who would be allowed to come see them would be fathers of family's (clan chiefs) so that no women are allowed and neither unmarried or unaccomplished men could attend.

Books would be reserved for the most brightest individuals, there would be 3 groups of druids and Fian each containing a trio of village druids with a duo of warriors (they would be called Fian and they would protect the druids from unlawful murder) who would visit separate family's in the village and teach how to read and write to the parents so that they may teach it to their own kids so that nothing could be asserted by an outsider of the family, the same trios would come back and assess the intellect of each family's teenagers according to a scripture given to them so that if they exhibit signs of being smart they would be allowed to enter a order of learning that would be primarily focused on books and oral teachings, if someone is a student of this education system copies of the books at a lower degree would be sent back to their brothers and sisters, books need to have eventually come into existence at some point so that learning would be a lot easier as a whole, maybe the idea would be copied from the Greeks or Romans,
The sons of the father would be the ones taught first then their sisters may be taught thereafter if the brothers are shown to be worthy of attention, if the father's sons were to all fail this there would be 3 attempts before they would be exempt from learning so that no more time could be wasted on unintelligent students.

The druids assigned to a village would hold main meetings with chieftains so that the well being of the clan leader's people would be discussed, all of the communication between a clan and druids would be at the main decision of the clan itself, there would be significant benefits to learning like an improvement of lifestyle and help from outside of the clan, a clan's power would be ranked depending on how intelligent and learned they are so that the most intelligent clans are able to be bred together, rogue clans would be able to interbreed together but a king's clan (clan under the protection of the king) would only be able to procreate with another king's clan so that the best genes may be harvested from their bloodlines, the future generations of these clans would live in luxury but would still be able to go visit their family's and decide ultimately if they wish to continue learning, a father would rely upon his sons to become part of the order of learning so that intelligent large family's are encouraged and the fathers would therefore encourage his sons to learn from the druids so that his family could increase in power for future generations, a kings man's daughters would be bargaining points for being able to create better children with another clan, the most intelligent clans would live in the most up built towns in relative proximity, perhaps certain family's would be selected from specific county's to be part of a more wealthy county, keep in mind that any man or women of a clan may return to rogue status if they so wish but all contact will not be severed unless they want to do so, there would be no persecution over a clan going rogue because it would not be in the kings interest to wage war upon an independent group of his own people.

These village druids would be specialized in teaching knowledge to people, they would be the replacement of modern teachers but instead of teaching people how to think they would instead be very basic teachings of language which if all goes well would be allowed to be taught further knowledge
The three druid groups each containing a trio and duo of different druids and Fian would visit thrice a week to a village or clan so that they teach reading and writing first then expand their horizon of wisdom later on if the clan decides they want to learn.

The most highest priority clans would have access to becoming bards themselves and then becoming druids or joining Fianship to protect towns from other rogue savages and being the general protector of the kingdom, there would be specific Fian groups for each county so that there wouldn't be an overlap of difference between each of them.

This is the way this society works. Kinda works like Equestria to be honest, i might explain later.
(Cont)
Anonymous
0bd4107
?
No.286443
286446
287A1ECC9968B2206A2ECE851DD14BD2-216595deredditfied.png
>>286432
I'm not reading all that, but I made your meme less reddit, friend. :)
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.286446
the goyim know2.png
>>286410
>>286432
I would assume that while the king or whoever continues to build up his nation of 200 IQ mega chads the Slavs in the east become Christian and then are subverted into Communism sometime around the middle ages due to them being the niggers of the Aryan race so the vikings become more prominent around the 8th century after the Roman empire is fully conquered by the Saxons and the Roman remnants flock to the east so they are constantly fighting with this Russian empire of Judaic-Christians, the Saxons are at odds ends with the Muslim invaders all the time so they can't really build up anything, the Celts are sort of left to their own devices of creating a Celtic community of highly intelligent Aryans, Scandinavia is a blocker against the Christians and the Saxons are a wall to the mongol and Muslim hordes so there is nothing threatening the Celtic kingdom so there would be a very long time of peace in this period of time other than the occasional viking or Saxon attempt at invasion but other then that the Saxons and Norsemen know that this kingdom is very well constructed so they focus more on their own problems instead, the main up built forts would be centered around key points of attack along the northern and southern coast to protect from invaders.

So by this time it's about halfway through the 14th century so the attacks from the Muslims change to becoming influxes of Khazar or Semitic Jews into the holy Slavic/Roman empire, the Christian towns were more open to Jews festering in them then the rest of Europe so therefor the Semites bred with the already Roman Slavic half castes to eventually become a mixed mongrel race of Italic/Slavic/Semitic race of hate that can only focus on war between the Norse, Saxons and Muslims for being non Christians, the Mongolians could attack this empire repeatedly but the Muslims would turn to attacking them and they would fight each other while the Mohammed's could control northern Africa along with Egypt.

The world would stay like this until around 1699 which would be the discovery of new America by the adventuring Celts after they have more or less completed perfecting their kingdom they turn to exploration of the outside areas beyond the seas.
I'm not gonna go fully into new America after that but it's now completely down to (You) if you want America to turn into a rogue clan or keep it being under the thumb of the Celtic king.
Maybe the Celtic burgers take the idea of colonization further than the king wanted or something, perhaps the American execution of order 66 on the native red skinned spear suckers angered their doctrine of nonaggression to outsiders, so the king wanted them executed for going against their order but the Celtic Americans won against his lordship then colonized south America and Mexico but the king would already have colonized south Africa and Australia so they would have an equal or similar amount of power to each other but the king wouldn't persecute them any further for going rogue on him, the vikings could control Canada or something instead of having the frogs own Quebec it would be something like Thordick.

The Jewish/Slavic/Roman/Christian empire of evil would become Communist around a hundred years earlier so around 1818 they would have converted to Communism from Christian by the heavy influx of Jews festering around Stalingrad or Semitegrad, the Mongolians would have control of China after breaking through the China number 1 wall and Japan would be in contact with Albion so they would be exposed to druidism and convert to it because it would probably appeal to the Japs pretty well, the Japanese could have conquered all of Asia so there would be no real competition between the soy samurais other then the Mongolians.

Perhaps the industrial revolution occurred a hundred years earlier too, so it was more forgiving rather than having terrible lives under the rule of a Christian king it would be Celtic and thus more in favor of actual advancement rather than having rich cunts high up who control all the railways, the king would own the railways instead of greedy snobs so that it would be for the benefit of the people to educate them faster since the trains could bring them straight to the teaching towns Basically these high class towns are like Canterlot and most of the other normal towns would function like Ponyville, so they are very close net and know each other. then those wealthy pesky upperclassmen could never exist because the superstate would make sure they didn't as Capitalism would not be a problem at this point due to money being only a minuscule worry rather then it being the main focus of society it would be only used in these teaching towns and with king's clans that work for the nation but the money would be needed in order to board the trains so that it would be a stopping point for any rogue clan trying to hijack them, the trains would be heavily guarded as a guarantee that no one may steal the cargo.

>How would it respond to the Cold War, or the birth of smartphones?
Perhaps something like the cold war could happen between Albion and Albain where they have separate forms of civilization to one another around the year of 1888 so they are threatening each other with unclear weapons at this point but eventually it cools down because they realize that all this threatening is pointless and childish so they make a truce or something.
Electronics would be highly advanced assuming that Nikolai Tesla's ideas were taken for the people's benefit instead of having wires everywhere so you would only need towers on top of mountains in order to power the land, computers would be invented around the period of the early 1920's.
>>286443
Thanks i will use this one over the previous, nice paint skills.
someone made a redrawing of this image a while ago on here.

(Cont)
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.286450
1602388839341.png
>How would it handle Vietnam and the Middle East?
The Mongolians would be in control of this area so maybe the Japanese and new America join together and fight them then take the rice fields by storm in helicopters around the year of 1900 so there would be pretty much nothing the Mongolian Vietnamese half bloods would be able to do since they would still be quite primitive at this point, America claims China and Japan claims Taiwan and Vietnam for themselves, the relationship between the Japs and burgers would be mutual and fairly good.
The middle east would be almost fully Jewish instead of Muslim so that all the desert rats use the niggers as slaves from northern Africa like the Egyptians did, maybe there was a civil war in the Jewish empire between them instead of an American one, a fight between the northern Jews and southern Muslims, the Muslims would be slave masters and the Jews would have gotten greedy and wanted more nigger slaves to do their dirty work.
>Would it allow the Jew Empire to exist/get nukes?
The Empire of Jewry would have inferior technology but would have far greater numbers so you could base the story around the ongoing war between the Celtic kingdom and Jewish Communism, it would be a long war starting in 1955 then ending in 1988, there would be many bloody battles over this time.
We would be in the process of in harnessing the atom because most of the technology we would have invented we would be for the benefit of people rather than as weapons of war, so in 1969 we discover how to create the atomic bomb so it's sort of a rush to who can mass produce it the most so we eventually nuke the Jews and turn them to shadows but the cost would be the Jews nuked some parts of our places, you can decide which.
>Would it invest in solar-laser space superweapon shit to get a radioactivity-free superweapon option?
You could have us build that after nukes proved to not destroy as efficiently, we reach space in 1923 and continue space colonization further so you might tie the cold war in here with the space race between Britannia and new America here to see which one gets to space first, it's your choice which when gets there first.
We use this death star to destroy one of Uranus's moons (Uranus has 27 moons) to test it's destructive power then fine tune it down a notch so that it'll give the earth a cake glazing of Jew ash.inside of Semitegrad to make them surrender then that would be the decisive victory for us.
>Would things from our history happen in this world? How would they change and reshape it?
Most things would be shaped or wouldn't exist, maybe the Jewish empire declared war on the Germanic Saxons which could get us involved somehow to replace world war 2 with world war Jew.
Most things i have already specified.
>Would new-America become "A better druidic land" or would it become less religious over time?
It would be it's own distinct colony free from the rule of a king but a better version of democracy entirely, if you read what i wrote before then you will know.
>And that "Australian Ascendancy" idea... I once saw a video that claimed we could easily turn all of Australia green and fertile, making it a food-producing economic powerhouse with shitloads of land you can live on, if we just made an artificial river in the middle of the desert.
It could work to give Britannia a edge against America, we own South Africa while they own south America and we own Australia while they own China, it creates a more equal balance of power to have it be this way.

Not gonna go through every sentence here.
>I still think it's hilarious that Australia, a fucking penal colony made of people the UK didn't want, ended up doing better than any nigger country out there because even criminal whites (without decades of commie brainwashing) still have the capacity to be better than niggers.
Huh i never though about that, it makes sense though as an example of how hopeless the Negro race truly is, the Aryan outmatches him in every aspect other then being a nigger for only a nigger excels in the art of being a nigger.
>How would this reshape their culture, country, and place in the world? Would they be forced to pay debts to Albion/Albain for the help?
A druid japan sounds fairly funny, Japan would have the status of honorary Aryan as they deserve it, there is no reason to take something from others if it is rightfully theirs, The bamboo boys would have to give up some of their rice fields for us so that we can have some part of Asia to call ours so the best option would be the chinks.
>Would they be a military ally? When would they conquer China?
They would be given freedom but perhaps we could split China in half between the burgers and Japs, they would conquer China and Vietnam together so that the Nam war would be successful instead of for no reason.
The war would occur somewhere around 1919 so we would have helicopters to take on the talking trees.

>If this world's got more high-IQ whites and a culture that says controlling and limiting govt authority is good, would everyone get gun rights in "America"?
Yes that would be the main reason for them turning into a rogue clan, the founding fathers would be called founding chiefs instead, they would have complete freedom to do what they want as being highly intelligent and completely free.
>Would the best military grade weapons be restricted to druids and the military only?
In Albion or Britannia only the Fian and king's clans would be allowed weapons due to the destructive nature of them, druids would be unable to use firearms as it sort of defeats the purpose of being one, in new America there would be no gun laws necessary as there would be no niggers to worry about.

(Last cont, i will finish this some time tomorrow perhaps)
Anonymous
3038032
?
No.286501
Spoilered
>>286410
>Would all those high-IQ whites respond to failing and flawed institutions by replacing them with superior alternatives once the technology to replace them is available, resulting in the replacement of public/private schooling with a mix of solo online education and clubs kids attend during monday-friday for specific topics and interests, while overly-expensive private schooling becomes a dying institution exclusively for the richest of the rich?
Maybe at the invention of computers the primary focus is distributing knowledge first then electronic games would be made after in the 1940's, around this time they would have highly advanced districts under the gaze of the king so that computers would be accessible in every household around the mid 1930's so that books could be copy pasted onto the mainframe of every major city connected by a free broadcasting signal that requires no fee, all city's would have their own computer mainframes held in the basement of the town hall which would be on strict observance so that no tampering could be done, they wouldn't electricity cables as there would be a broadcasting tower connected to the town hall attached to a smaller circuit route that would then be connected to the mainframe underground, the circuit would be a stoppage point for any direct hits by lightning so that the mainframe would completely short circuit from an overload of power, the circuit would then be connected to a reserve power source which would act as an emergency backup, the main thing that would power the mainframe would be some form of electromagnetic field in the basement itself so that if there was ever a cut to the city's energy the mainframe would not corrupt and lose all it's saved data, it would be highly advanced and able to have multiple emergency systems in case anything were to happen.
Teaching wouldn't be a worry at this point as everyone would have a gigantic assortment of digital books already on their computer's memory in a organized folder, teaching by druids would still commence but only for people who actually want to learn specific talents, druids would not become obsolete as they would still have major roles like medicine and astronomical observation so with the advancement of learning astronomy would become the main objective of the nation so there would be a new type of profession which would be something like a rocket druid that would specialize in physics and engineering these flying dildo's.
Teachings would be mostly home school centered and rely mostly on the parents to teach but there would be several options for a parent to choose their children to learn, there would be no institutes so books would be a major factor in learning new things, a mother or father could teach their kids how to read and write then ask for a book depending on how good this family is (IQ would be the main rank in this society) they will be given any subject depicting anything at will, if they are worthy of the books they will be given them, there won't be restrictions on books because that's fucking dumb but there would be a threshold of IQ so that nothing may be wasted on dumb savages.

>Where would it fall on a scale of Capitalism to Protectionism?
Small businesses would not be infringed and distribution of foods and goods would be handled by the specific county's chieftain so that he may decide what his own clan wants without the biased decision of a foreigner of his family, with this the government would have no way of interfering with daily lives and farming as there would only be druids assigned to check the quality of crops and livestock, if the food's conditions are inadequate then selling to major county's wouldn't be allowed but distribution to other clans would be let free to happen, the major income of food would be homegrown rather then abroad and most people would get it from the local goods or grow it themselves.
Business would work on a system of trust and work, labor would create trust and then with the bond created a man would be able to use his labor funds to purchase whatever he desired, national socialism would be a main inspiration so the distribution of wealth would be public rather then private, coins would be the main currency so inflation and debt would be hard to accomplish.
I would say this is more closely related to national socialism but with a monarchist twist.

>Every single detail about this world... It's just as foreign to me as the idea of living in an old American sitcom with strong masculine responsible admirable fathers, kind stay-at-home mothers who actually cook for you, no niggers, and an actual community to live in.
Eh, it's an ideal world where freedom is the main motto so we can only dream of a better world than this decaying culture surrounded by vultures.
A Europe without niggers and Aryan beauty is filled in every walk of life, freedom soars high in the sky, pride is wide and love is in everything, old traditions are brought back from the dead, Aryan culture is left to prosper without the interference of outsiders and everyone is willing to forgive and forget.Kings take on the old ways of Celtic initiation and are guided towards making the land prevail with a kind and gentle hand, people help others on their journey and no one is left alone in the dark about things no longer as there is help waiting for people but they only need to ask for it, family's are no longer pointlessly bickering at one another and teenage lovers are left to roam the fields of their homes together without the worry of mundane schools or the future that lies ahead of them.
Tfw
This took quite a while but i hope you do something with it, Jason.
Anonymous
8d93ce9
?
No.286672
This world is too perfect for the story I'd planned on writing to work in it. I'll put this world in a new story specifically about this world where the numerous good guy characters fight a war against the bad guys to end the slaver empire.
What if France and maybe some other shitty european states went commie and got mudslime-infested and suffered for it so the audience can see that even in a perfect world, communism never works?