Well Dr. Kaufman does raise some interesting points and speaks authoritatively, but he speaks in half-truths ("lies by omission")>mortality from all causes shows fewer people dying than average, so COVID-19 is made up
He cites mortality data for the US from the CDC which shows this for the country as a whole. Okay, but we had pretty early lockdowns for most states. Gif related is the same for Europe. How else do you explain the last 10 weeks, if not COVID-19?https://euromomo.eu/>in fact there has been no virus isolated from any patient
I'd like to hear what he has to say about this then (second pic, an entire fucking section called "Isolation of virus")https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092803/pdf/NEJMoa2001017.pdf
Which allowed them to perform microscopy on the particles, third pic (look closely you can see Corona-chan's spike proteins), gonna need a hell of an explanation for this one.
From digging in the literature I will admit he does seem correct in that one cannot isolate a purified batch of coronavirus particles in the same way one can isolate particles of bacteriophage viruses (using chromatography). So that example is well-chosen but he implies that's the only way to do it.
Another thing, in this paper the batches of virus were cultivated over 4 to 6 weeks, obviously "isolation" like this is a shitty way to establish a clinical diagnosis.
Bold claims that rRT-PCR cannot
be used to claim that viruses exist.>Most of the genetic material that would be present in the lung fluid would be our own genetic material and other microbes>We just really don't know because we've just never compared it
They tracked the cultivation of the isolated virus using RT-PCR (second pic) >SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence is 80% identical to SARS-CoV-1 but humans are chimps are 96% identical
Apples to oranges. One, RNA mutates more readily than DNA. Two, these viruses have about 30k nucleobases whereas humans have over 3 billion base pairs. So the homology score when comparing two viruses even in the same family is bound to be less.>80% false positive rate
I want to see his source on that number. I found a paper that discusses PCR accuracy for diagnosing COVID-19, positive test results are implied to be robust. The concern is over false negatives. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0285>no control group
PCR uses control assays AFAIK.>actually NO virus has been shown to cause illness, it's all models based on genetic fragments bro
Flipping from "this virus doesn't exist" to "viruses don't cause disease"? Stopped watching there.>>269064>So, it would be pretty straight to inject it into animals and to reproduce such illness (it's called scientific method)
If it were established that animals were a proxy for human illness but why should that be the case? (Another grain of truth though, I'm sure they were using ferrets to cultivate strains of Corona-chan in Wuhan; for such illnesses these animals do seem to be an okay proxy)>except if your career depends of it ($$$$$$$$$$$).
I think we are seeing such conflicts of interest, but it's coming from virologists that make a living doing Frankenstein experiments with chimeric viruses to make them more infectious (like...SARS-CoV-2 is). These individuals are constantly and vocally insisting this thing came from nature when evidence suggests otherwise.>>269097>fourth pic
whew lad the level of irony here is unreal
Thinking COVID-19 doesn't exist is pretty stupid but it's funny b/c I agree with most anons when it comes to political stuff: (((financiers))) are exploiting this crisis, fuck their expansion of power and wealth, fuck any supposed vaccine that will emerge from this. Oh but silver lining, this may finally lead to an IRL culture clash, so get ready for that.