/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

htymrymsrs.jpg
Vaccines.
Anonymous
RAi7p
?
No.251951
251955 251963 251993 252097 253193 275896 275900 282396 318561
A glimpse on this modern threat.
575 replies and 497 files omitted.
Anonymous
61f8891
?
No.348743
index.jpeg
>WHO Admits Everyone Who Receives a MonkeyPox Jab Is Part of a 'Clinical Trial'
https://www.eutimes.net/2022/07/who-admits-everyone-who-receives-a-monkeypox-jab-is-part-of-a-clinical-trial/
https://twitter.com/TexasLindsay_/status/1550881083109113857
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349072
349073 349076
hv8StWoIne64_640x360.jpg
ea851e6cce36a9edb4230b53e671a76d.jpeg
seGrh.png
>Are Viruses Even A Scientific Theory? (English Subtitles) - (19:19 long)
>Dr. Sam Bailey of New Zealand lays out the logical steps of the recent "Virus Challenge" to the orthodox methodologies of "modern virology!"
>The “Settling the Virus Debate” statement has already caused a few shockwaves.
>In this video we’ll explore:
>What the statement actually says
>Why virology is not consistent with the scientific method
>Circular reasoning fallacies being presented as “evidence”
>Dr Mark Bailey’s response to a virologist’s “irrefutable evidence” of SARS-CoV-2
https://odysee.com/@Hmanpro:e/Virus-debate:2
Mirror, no subtitles:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hv8StWoIne64/
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349073
349076
SETTLING-THE-VIRUS-DEBATE-Source.pdf
xe3.png
xe4.png
>>349072
>The “Settling the Virus Debate” statement
Here the source:
https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349076
349077
>>349072
>>349073
Do you unironically think that contagious viral pathogens don't exist?
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349077
349078
>>349076
Correct, contagious viruses are an oxymoron.
But it is not about what an anon thinks, but the flawed research on them and therefore the humongous hoax is virology.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349078
349079 349080
>>349077
I know the virology community has plenty of self-serving shitheads, but viruses are a real thing. We've known about them for a while now. We've reproduced them in labs and tested rats for their symptoms. We've sequenced the genomes of some of them to see how strains mutate year by year in populations.
They are absolutely contagious. Other contagious pathogens exist (bacteria, parasites and certain prions), but viruses are unique.
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349079
349083
>>349078
Dude, read the thread, virology doesn't hold water. But you still go on with the establishment narrative. Either you never dug into the issue and insist on something you have no clue whatsoever, which make you into a moron; or, you did but are not bringing any data to debunk the Terrain Theory and therefore your claims validating the Germ Theory are empty.
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349080
349081
>>349078
>Other contagious pathogens exist (bacteria, parasites and certain prions), but viruses are unique.
Sure, many alive organisms are pathogenic and contagious, the so called viruses are dead cellular garbage and harmless.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349081
349082
>>349080
Viruses aren't organisms, or at least not by the standards of what we consider to be alive. Things don't need to be alive to be pathogenic though. Viruses aren't considered alive because they have no ability to reproduce on their own, only highjack a living cell's capabilities; despite lack of capacity for self propagation, they can still spread from host to host using the host's own cell signalling systems.

And then there's prions, which are basically just proteins folded wrong, but still end up being contagious between hosts, and keep replicating even within dead tissue material.
>harmless
Many of them are no threat to most humans, but many more are also still harmful and absolutely contagious. They can only spread through contagion, either between cells of a host or between the hosts themselves.
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349082
349086
>>349081
Perhaps you are knowledgeable enough, because 9 of 10 doctors got blank when asked where viruses come from, meaning that them are the equivalent of shop mechanics reading the manual when confronted with the subject.
All animals have inside TRILLIONS of viruses, because those particles are the a natural process of the cells getting rid of toxicity and debris. The claim that those debris reproduce is non-sense as well that they cause sickness.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349083
349084
>>349079
I have read the thread. I just haven't posted to it very often.
>Germ theory
You literally just said in the other post that pathogenic organisms exist: that's germ theory. It began with microorganisms like bacteria.
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349084
349085 349086
>>349083
The thread is about vaccines, which are based in the supposedly pathogenic nature of the so called viruses.
Alive pathogenic organisms is a totally different category not covered by vaccines.
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349085
>>349084
>Alive pathogenic organisms is a totally different category
See antibiotics for treatment.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349086
349087
>>349082
>those debris reproduce
They don't reproduce. They attach to the cell walls of living cells and hijack their signalling systems to force the cells to make copies of them.
> 9 of 10 doctors got blank when asked where viruses come from
For the same reason that they can't say for certain what the origin of life is: they weren't there when the first viruses came about, and they have no means to know if they can just spontaneously appear (prions can though. Interesting little fuckers).
For all science can tell, the only known viruses have been derivative of other viruses,
>All animals have inside TRILLIONS of viruses
You only call it a virus if it spreads virally. Normal cell signaling protein packages wouldn't be considered such if they only deteriorate after fulfilling their purpose.
>as well that they cause sickness.
The sickness is caused by the death or impairment of host cells that have been made to print garbage RNA to perpetuate a virus instead of fulfilling their actual purposes, and the body's immune response to that.
And if you think that something produced in the body can't possibly cause illness, know that cancer cells are produced in the body too.
>>349084
I am absolutely skeptical of modern vaccine industries, and any attempts to mandate their untested products or enrich their shareholders, and I want more medical transparency in the industry, and less secrecy to protect their financial interests. I have not however seen sufficient counters to the evidence that viruses exist.
>Alive pathogenic organisms
They are indeed. They're also treated differently in the field of medicine. Antibiotics and antivirals don't work the same way.
As for prions... Nobody knows wtf to do with them. They're basically indestructible, and appear whenever they want.
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349087
349088
>>349086
>As for prions... Nobody knows wtf to do with them. They're basically indestructible, and appear whenever they want.
According to who? Follow the money anon.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349088
349089
y3f6pb7wlom11.png
>>349087
What do you mean "according to who"? I just said nobody knows what to do with them; except maybe the few people who pretend they know how to treat them. Prion diseases are basically hopeless, painful deaths at this point. Medical science hasn't come that far.
Just don't eat human brains, and don't feed cows to cows.
>Follow the money
Are you implying that the elites secretly have a cure to prison diseases, and are paying people off to suppress it?
I wouldn't be surprised, I bet they have cures for cancer too, but prion diseases aren't really common enough for that to have a major profit motive.
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349089
349090
>>349088
>Are you implying that the elites secretly have a cure to prison diseases, and are paying people off to suppress it?
Nope, I'm saying watch out for "scientific" hoaxes that cannot be corroborated by people who are not funded by those claiming the illness exist indeed. Remember the AIDS hoax.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349090
349091
>>349089
>Remember the AIDS hoax.
There were multiple hoaxes and psyops concerning AIDS. Which one are you referring to?

As for prions, there's quite a bit of research concerning them, although few treatments for them once they manifest (some things are just hard to treat). They're basically just rogue proteins that fuck stuff up wherever they go; even simpler than viruses, and many times as deadly.
In any case, there haven't been very many sweeping government policies concerning them (although I guess we're not allowed to feed baby cows the ground-up remains of their parent's brains and spinal cords anymore, boo hoo), so I'll put my skepticism of their existence on hold.
Anonymous
cc3d733
?
No.349091
349093
>>349090
>They're basically just rogue proteins that fuck stuff up wherever they go
You are told.
Allow me to be skeptical of the scientists' claims.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349093
>>349091
You don't think transmissible spongiform encephalopathies cause diseases in humans?
What do you think caused mad cow disease then? It was verified by scientists on three continents to be the result of deformed proteins caused by forcing cows to eat each other.
Of course, that could be a lie, but they did find those proteins in the brains of both infected cattle and humans who'd consumed the meat.

Now, you could say that they didn't have direct evidence that the mutated proteins caused the illness in people due to not performing experiments on human subjects (which would involve killing people), but they were able to reproduce the results in rats who are the tainted beef.

I can't really think of why people would about that one in particular, except maybe to shut down a couple factory farms and maybe make excuses for beef tariffs. Of course, the medical industry is full of frauds and hacks, so critical skepticism is always important.

But I believe them enough to not feed cows to cows and not practice cannibalism, because apparently humans/cow biology isn't meant for that crap.
Anonymous
b58b3b4
?
No.349404
349405 349517
964d655fa76a0b05cf989935cbae93915c0a0af311914914a34bd962bb4b9f6c.jpg
Does anyone here have anecdotes or statistics relating to the recently approved Novavax Covid vaccine? From my own research it appears to be a legitimate vaccine using "tried-and-true" protein subunit tech. The kind that's been in use for decades. But I want to know how people's bodies have actually been reacting to it. It's available in several countries now including the USA so there should be news one way or the other.
Anonymous
d78b456
?
No.349405
c96c.png
>>349404
>it appears to be a legitimate vaccine
This has to be trolling.
Anonymous
d78b456
?
No.349406
349519
019637b1b91d1c3614f8eb126050c07e.jpeg
>What about rabies? - (17:29 long)
>Sometimes in the middle of a virus existence debate, someone blurts out, “What about rabies?”
>Rabies is a terrifying condition that has haunted the human imagination for centuries. I’ll look into the science of rabies and explain why most of us don’t need to worry about it.
>And get ready for our special guest narrator, Spacebusters, who describes the questionable 1930s animal experiments.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/What-About-Rabies:a
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/y71h9hZ8dYLM/
Anonymous
2e21715
?
No.349514
speaking-monkeypox-letter-k-is-silent.jpg

Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349517
349518
>>349404
So far there's been little documented evidence of adverse reactions.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349518
>>349517
Of course, it still remains to be seen how it works.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349519
>>349406
If you ever get bitten by a mad dog, I seriously hope you go get treatment for it immediately. Rabies is a horrible and painful way to die. I've seen animals die from that shit before they could be put down, and it is gruesome.
Anonymous
2e21715
?
No.349710
746512.jpeg
>More Parents Than Ever Are Now Starting To Question ‘Routine’ Childhood Vaccines
>Childood vaccination rates started to plummet with the onset of the covid pandemic.
>Then, as concerns started to surface regarding safety of the Covid jabs, some parents also began questioning the need for so many of the other vaccines that were being recommended by public health officials.
https://newspunch.com/more-parents-than-ever-are-now-starting-to-question-routine-childhood-vaccines/
https://twitter.com/HGessling/status/1555876720238120961
Anonymous
9137450
?
No.349906
349919
File (hide): A233D8F9C314FAE57FE37EC36A86512F-6933018.mp4 (6.6 MB, Resolution:360x360 Length:00:02:33, Polio 101.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Polio 101.mp4
Polio 101 - The Missing Medical School Lectures
The fascinating parts about Polio you might have missed in Medical School, presented in 2 minutes. Packed with interesting information guaranteed to help clarify the foggy bits of the amazing Polio story.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.349919
349922
>>349906
The polio reemergence is the result of importing shitskins from third world countries. We could've been free of it forever, but no, they just had to have diversity.
Anonymous
9d4c9ab
?
No.349922
>>349919
The polio thing is a man-made poisoning dating before any shitskin even showed up in the radar.
Anonymous
2e21715
?
No.350024
vaccine ingredients.png

Anonymous
0c3a0ae
?
No.350576
18d24df12f6c16c2a3b18a534c6573ed.jpg
>Dr. Stefan Lanka: Biology As It Is Not - A Refutation of Genetics, Virology & Cell Theory
>Biologist and marine biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka tells us the history of virology. He refutes previous knowledge about genetics, virology and cell theory.
>As a virologist, he looked into the previous concepts and understood that they are not correct.
>Most people believe in a terror biology in which our own molecules turn against us and only want to kill and spread. Dr. Lanka refutes this misconception.
>The lecture was recorded on January 21, 2022.
>TIME STAMPS:
>0:00:00 Presentation WE - knowledge is relevant
>0:00:40 Biology as it is not
>0:05:15 Democritus material explanation for life
>0:08:57 Eugen Rosenstock on sham research
>0:10:00 Rudolf Virchow Basics for euthanasia
>0:23:12 Anti-science as the basis of virology
>0:32:00 When, why and who created virology?
>0:42:57 Refutation of genetics
>0:48:32 The start of Corona in China
>0:53:09 Inaccuracy of the PCR test
>0:55:56 A chance to generate a leap in human development
https://odysee.com/@Daniel:bd/Stefan-Lanka---Genetics-Virology-and-Cell-Theory-Eng-2M-W24:2
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0uYlIVrwR8HI/
Anonymous
02dec10
?
No.350584
350585
>>347973
Despite how long those two snippets are they are too brief for what they cover. The pointless inflammatory language makes me wonder if it's designed to associate the subject with disinformation too.
The simple version is that the polio virus does exist but it doesn't cause paralysis on it's own. The vaccine never worked, it's an endemic virus that's living in your guts right now. The paralysis was caused by ingesting poisoned food that fucked the blood-brain barrier allowing the polio and who knows what else past causing meningitis/encephalitis.
Saulk knowingly did evil things. The formaldehyde they used to attenuate the virus made it cyst up instead of killing it even if they didn't remove all the formaldehyde. They knowingly injected kids with poison and live virus in the deep muscle where it was more likely to infect the nervous system. They were causing polio, cases increased when the vaccine was introduced after decreasing at the same rate as the reduction in toxic pesticide usage. That was with the government changing the definition to limit what was counted as polio.
<insert JFK.jpg here>
Anonymous
457342d
?
No.350585
350586
junmd.jpg
>>350584
>polio
Let's see if something with less "inflammatory" language will make it through.
https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/startling-history-polio-vaccination
Anonymous
02dec10
?
No.350586
>>350585
That's much better. It doesen't leave any room to blame the author of not believing in pathogens. Normalfags love their witch hunts, for science.
I forgot about the monkey kidney cancer.
Fuck
Anonymous
2e21715
?
No.351710
img_7367-624x1024.jpg

Anonymous
6655a3c
?
No.351909
vaccine_snake_with_baby-1536x1198.jpg

Anonymous
872fda9
?
No.352432
ab7381a1d1f386c5918eda57a8a06bef.jpg
059.png
34.png
509.png
>Secrets of Virology - "Control" Experiments - (15:26 long)
>Recently, there was a claim that virologists carry out properly controlled experiments, which show that the "no virus" position is false. Have we missed something?
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Secrets-of-Virology-Control-Experiments:e
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/53sMfVHesdLv/
In a nutshell, virology is a fraud.
Anonymous
872fda9
?
No.352616
e09bdfsd1fcf.png

Anonymous
4af77c3
?
No.352665
352673
I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.mp4
>I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person
>Eustace Mullins quotes a book a doctor wrote in the year 1936: "I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.352673
352677
>>352665
Correlation doesn't imply causation, tbh. There are tons of different ways to get cancer.
Anonymous
4af77c3
?
No.352677
352679 352683
>>352673
A glaring detail about cancer is that there are not historical records of it before vaccines.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.352678
352679
>>352675
>there is not historical records of it before vaccines
Again, correlation =/= causation. A variable you're not considering is that people didn't call it cancer until relatively recenrly. Records of cancer by other names go back to 3000 BC.
I'm not dismissing the plausibility that ingredients in vaccines could cause or exacerbate cancer, but to say that vaccines cause all cancer is just completely unfounded.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.352679
352680
>>352677
>>352678
>Some of the earliest evidence of cancer is found among fossilized bone tumors, human mummies in ancient Egypt, and ancient manuscripts. Growths suggestive of the bone cancer called osteosarcoma have been seen in mummies. Bony skull destruction as seen in cancer of the head and neck has been found, too.
>Our oldest description of cancer (although the word cancer was not used) was discovered in Egypt and dates back to about 3000 BC. It’s called the Edwin Smith Papyrus and is a copy of part of an ancient Egyptian textbook on trauma surgery. It describes 8 cases of tumors or ulcers of the breast that were removed by cauterization with a tool called the fire drill. The writing says about the disease, “There is no treatment.”
>The origin of the word cancer is credited to the Greek physician Hippocrates (460-370 BC), who is considered the “Father of Medicine.” Hippocrates used the terms carcinos and carcinoma to describe non-ulcer forming and ulcer-forming tumors. In Greek, these words refer to a crab, most likely applied to the disease because the finger-like spreading projections from a cancer called to mind the shape of a crab. The Roman physician, Celsus (25 BC - 50 AD), later translated the Greek term into cancer, the Latin word for crab. Galen (130-200 AD), another Greek physician, used the word oncos (Greek for swelling) to describe tumors. Although the crab analogy of Hippocrates and Celsus is still used to describe malignant tumors, Galen’s term is now used as a part of the name for cancer specialists – oncologists.
Where did you hear about cancer only occurring after vaccines? Inbred nobles have been growing painful tumors on their bodies since the beginning of written history.
That's not to say that vaccines or vaccine ingredients couldn't hypothetically be a cause, but they can't be the only cause. There are lots of things in the world that can cause cancer.
Anonymous
4af77c3
?
No.352680
352681
>>352679
Wait, is not those quotes from (((Wikipedia)))?
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.352681
>>352680
No.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.352682
More recently:
>The outstanding London surgeon Percivall Pott made numerous original observations. In 1775 he pointed out that many males who had been chimney sweepers while boys later suffered from scrotal cancer and linked this with irritation caused by soot, and thus identified the first cancer-causing occupation.
Cancer was understood and documented to be a disease before vaccines were even thought of. The earliest vaccine was in 1796, when Edward Jenner injected a teenager with cowpox to give him immunity to smallpox; and that was before vaccines were made from dead protein shells or mixed with other dubious additives and preservatives.

Again, not discounting the plausibility for vaccines to cause cancer, but cancer can clearly form independently from vaccines.
Anonymous
d5b45c7
?
No.352683
>>352677
Where did you hear this?
Anonymous
d526ae7
?
No.352742
GDa6WZel-92990228.jpeg