Who wants to see a fanfic in which, halfway through chapter one, my donut steel OC debates Glimmer and then kicks her ass when she attacks him?
/go/ - Golden Oaks
Thread Repository
File (): 4AE9A9BCFBD4C1663FBAC7EEE46E0864-278619.png (272.1 KB, 750x259, 1533230535886-0.png)
450 replies and 214 files omitted.
>>3594
Look you haven't committed any crime but you need to remember you are on an imageboard and imageboards love their autism. A >100k word fanfic where glimmer is BTFO'd is some powerful 'tismry. Sperging out when people aren't interested in your work just adds fuel to the fire. My advice is to delete the thread and don't try to promote your work on imageboards.
Look you haven't committed any crime but you need to remember you are on an imageboard and imageboards love their autism. A >100k word fanfic where glimmer is BTFO'd is some powerful 'tismry. Sperging out when people aren't interested in your work just adds fuel to the fire. My advice is to delete the thread and don't try to promote your work on imageboards.
File (): 879454367A09D6B6FB52C78863B7F821-101795.jpg (99.4 KB, 600x800, image-44.jpg)
What if Glimmernigel is secretly Soygon?
>>3594
>Also, can you let me know why you feel the need to turn this fanfic-discussing thread into a childish IdPol shouting match
We're just telling you to fuck off. Also >this thread? No, >the last five threads you made entirely for the purpose of self promotion on the basis of politics.
>where you identify as the leaders and protectors and inquisitors of the alt-right and proceed to identify me as an "enemy of the alt-right" who must be "punished" through being called bad names on the board
The persecution complex is strong in this one. Being called a glimmernigger and a faggot is not special to you unless you make it so. Which clearly you did. You're the one who thinks mockery = idpol, who wrote an entire fanfic that was focused solely on a debate with an idpol commie. You started that discussion by promoting it on your first thread. Nobody made you into a martyr, you put yourself on a cross and then cried "father, why have you forsaken me?" While the rest of us are pointing and making fun of the self-important redditor shitting up multiple threads with his presence.
>on the board you could be using to dig up dirt on liberal Senators and other liberal politicians instead?
Q Anon thread, Syria thread, Random News, and so on and so forth. If you want regular news on this stuff just get the brushup from Awoo. If you want raids theelre was a thread about that. If you want political espionage that's not my area of expertise and you can't expect everyone to engage in something so risky and potentially criminal when we already know Hollywood and the DNC are full of pedos for a fact. Giving your social media a quick combing is all these people did for you to openly and liberally smear yourself all over the walls. You're acting like we hacked your IP address, sent you pizzas and spread a rumor that you groom traps in your goddamn basement.
>there's a pretty big difference in post quality when it comes to the people offering feedback and advice on improving ny craft, and the wannabe- Comissar infiltrators trying to pretend they're not just alt-right, but also people "alt-right" enough to decide who the community "needs" to turn against.
In other words there's a difference between one group of people who fruitlessly explain to you basic story structure, and trolls. Well no shit, Sherlock. And "trying to pretend they're not just alt-right, but also people "alt-right" enough to decide who the community "needs" to turn against"? Are you fucking retarded? Yes, we ARE alt-right. We all are part of the anti-neocon right wing who openly discuss issues of racial and sexual biological differences where the mainstream right does not, and reject notions of the multiculty melting pot. That's all it takes to be branded alt-right. Whether we're ancap, mutualist, monarchist or NatSoc, we all fit this definition by shared beliefs in the aforementioned fields. Nobody here is DENYING BEING ALT-RIGHT unless you are trying to apply the term more narrowly to different factions among us. What part of anything stated in ANY of these threads is """""wannabe-Commisar"""""? What pretending have you seen from anyone about anything? And what is this shit about needing anything? You mean getting sick of your sub-/sp/-quality posts taking up half this fucking imageboard and saying yyou should fuck off? Is that too authoritarian for you? THEN LEAVE!
>Also, can you let me know why you feel the need to turn this fanfic-discussing thread into a childish IdPol shouting match
We're just telling you to fuck off. Also >this thread? No, >the last five threads you made entirely for the purpose of self promotion on the basis of politics.
>where you identify as the leaders and protectors and inquisitors of the alt-right and proceed to identify me as an "enemy of the alt-right" who must be "punished" through being called bad names on the board
The persecution complex is strong in this one. Being called a glimmernigger and a faggot is not special to you unless you make it so. Which clearly you did. You're the one who thinks mockery = idpol, who wrote an entire fanfic that was focused solely on a debate with an idpol commie. You started that discussion by promoting it on your first thread. Nobody made you into a martyr, you put yourself on a cross and then cried "father, why have you forsaken me?" While the rest of us are pointing and making fun of the self-important redditor shitting up multiple threads with his presence.
>on the board you could be using to dig up dirt on liberal Senators and other liberal politicians instead?
Q Anon thread, Syria thread, Random News, and so on and so forth. If you want regular news on this stuff just get the brushup from Awoo. If you want raids theelre was a thread about that. If you want political espionage that's not my area of expertise and you can't expect everyone to engage in something so risky and potentially criminal when we already know Hollywood and the DNC are full of pedos for a fact. Giving your social media a quick combing is all these people did for you to openly and liberally smear yourself all over the walls. You're acting like we hacked your IP address, sent you pizzas and spread a rumor that you groom traps in your goddamn basement.
>there's a pretty big difference in post quality when it comes to the people offering feedback and advice on improving ny craft, and the wannabe- Comissar infiltrators trying to pretend they're not just alt-right, but also people "alt-right" enough to decide who the community "needs" to turn against.
In other words there's a difference between one group of people who fruitlessly explain to you basic story structure, and trolls. Well no shit, Sherlock. And "trying to pretend they're not just alt-right, but also people "alt-right" enough to decide who the community "needs" to turn against"? Are you fucking retarded? Yes, we ARE alt-right. We all are part of the anti-neocon right wing who openly discuss issues of racial and sexual biological differences where the mainstream right does not, and reject notions of the multiculty melting pot. That's all it takes to be branded alt-right. Whether we're ancap, mutualist, monarchist or NatSoc, we all fit this definition by shared beliefs in the aforementioned fields. Nobody here is DENYING BEING ALT-RIGHT unless you are trying to apply the term more narrowly to different factions among us. What part of anything stated in ANY of these threads is """""wannabe-Commisar"""""? What pretending have you seen from anyone about anything? And what is this shit about needing anything? You mean getting sick of your sub-/sp/-quality posts taking up half this fucking imageboard and saying yyou should fuck off? Is that too authoritarian for you? THEN LEAVE!
>>3577
>How would I improve?
You don't. Or, to be more precise, you won't.
I offered you advice in your previous threads, pointed you in the right directions to improve yourself, yet you failed to take any initiative beyond obeying directions, making it abundantly clear that you're here for instructions, and not improvement. Validation, and not accomplishment. Attention, and not quality. This observation became firmly cemented into the domain of fact, given your chain of replies throughout this thread.
If I were to give you advice, as my inner spoonfeeder is itching to do, you would do nothing but ask me question after question for the sole purpose of having me do the mental heavy lifting for you; to have me, in effect, write the story for you. You will get no such shortcuts from me.
With that in mind, I'd like to shift attention to (You), >>3579. I understand your intentions, believe me, but you should have stopped replying when he posted >>3586. We call it "spoonfeeding," but to really understand the futility of your attempts to help Nigel here, this kind of back-and-forth is also referred to as "Help Vampirism": http://slash7.com/2006/12/22/vampires/
Know the signs, direct your efforts appropriately, and you'll never be disappointed when you help others.
As for Nigel, you would do well to quit being such an enormous help vampire, and an attention whore. Do that, drop the bad attitude, and provide me with something that shows a modicum of effort and initiative, and I may consider offering you actual, tangible help, instead of the shitposts and insults that you currently deserve.
>How would I improve?
You don't. Or, to be more precise, you won't.
I offered you advice in your previous threads, pointed you in the right directions to improve yourself, yet you failed to take any initiative beyond obeying directions, making it abundantly clear that you're here for instructions, and not improvement. Validation, and not accomplishment. Attention, and not quality. This observation became firmly cemented into the domain of fact, given your chain of replies throughout this thread.
If I were to give you advice, as my inner spoonfeeder is itching to do, you would do nothing but ask me question after question for the sole purpose of having me do the mental heavy lifting for you; to have me, in effect, write the story for you. You will get no such shortcuts from me.
With that in mind, I'd like to shift attention to (You), >>3579. I understand your intentions, believe me, but you should have stopped replying when he posted >>3586. We call it "spoonfeeding," but to really understand the futility of your attempts to help Nigel here, this kind of back-and-forth is also referred to as "Help Vampirism": http://slash7.com/2006/12/22/vampires/
Know the signs, direct your efforts appropriately, and you'll never be disappointed when you help others.
As for Nigel, you would do well to quit being such an enormous help vampire, and an attention whore. Do that, drop the bad attitude, and provide me with something that shows a modicum of effort and initiative, and I may consider offering you actual, tangible help, instead of the shitposts and insults that you currently deserve.
>>3595
>sperging out
The crybabies in this thread keep saying I'm acting in this way or that, but I'm not. I'm not "Mad" that they're crying over what my work is. Why would I be? I have no reason to take what they say seriously. Certainly not when it's just leftist projection from crying Glimmer-waifu soyboys mixed with blatantly liberal shame tactics.
If I was being paid to make "Something for everyone", then sure, pissing off a bunch of people would be bad. But pissing off this fandom's vocal (((minority))) (see what I did there?) is something I'd do just by writing an episode where Glimmer isn't shoehorned in and treated like the ultimate expert in everything and blameless ultimate life form. Glimmer is basically just Tomoki from Heaven's Lost Property, mixed with a second-rate Sunset Shimmer knockoff. I have no reason to care what people who want to live the pathetic fantasy he represents say about my work or who they think I am. I know who I am, I know how many lives I've saved in my lifetime, and I know what I'm going to do. They only know what they're going to do tomorrow: masturbate over Glimmer some more, and cry at people who don't like her.
>sperging out
The crybabies in this thread keep saying I'm acting in this way or that, but I'm not. I'm not "Mad" that they're crying over what my work is. Why would I be? I have no reason to take what they say seriously. Certainly not when it's just leftist projection from crying Glimmer-waifu soyboys mixed with blatantly liberal shame tactics.
If I was being paid to make "Something for everyone", then sure, pissing off a bunch of people would be bad. But pissing off this fandom's vocal (((minority))) (see what I did there?) is something I'd do just by writing an episode where Glimmer isn't shoehorned in and treated like the ultimate expert in everything and blameless ultimate life form. Glimmer is basically just Tomoki from Heaven's Lost Property, mixed with a second-rate Sunset Shimmer knockoff. I have no reason to care what people who want to live the pathetic fantasy he represents say about my work or who they think I am. I know who I am, I know how many lives I've saved in my lifetime, and I know what I'm going to do. They only know what they're going to do tomorrow: masturbate over Glimmer some more, and cry at people who don't like her.
>>3600
>I have no reason to care what people who want to live the pathetic fantasy he represents say about my work or who they think I am
And yet, you remain here, posting thread after thread about it, to universal disdain.
>I have no reason to care what people who want to live the pathetic fantasy he represents say about my work or who they think I am
And yet, you remain here, posting thread after thread about it, to universal disdain.
>>3548
But But, Anon... Remember Yakity Yak? Aren't we suposed to encourage shitposting because it is what makes them happy?
But But, Anon... Remember Yakity Yak? Aren't we suposed to encourage shitposting because it is what makes them happy?
>>3599
Why does getting ignored make you so mad? You aren't entitled to my time or attention. Why try and convince him to stop talking to me? Do you hope that I'll validate your childish views on who fiction should be for if I have nobody else to talk to?
Saaaaaaalt.
Why does getting ignored make you so mad? You aren't entitled to my time or attention. Why try and convince him to stop talking to me? Do you hope that I'll validate your childish views on who fiction should be for if I have nobody else to talk to?
Saaaaaaalt.
>>3600
>Glimmer glimmer glimmer
You are absolutely obsessed with the character. You put everything you dislike onto her and use her as the scapegoat for the world's problems. It's gotten to the point where you're more focused on hurting Glimmer in your story than actually writing a good story.
>Glimmer glimmer glimmer
You are absolutely obsessed with the character. You put everything you dislike onto her and use her as the scapegoat for the world's problems. It's gotten to the point where you're more focused on hurting Glimmer in your story than actually writing a good story.
>>3563
>Not Real Communism
I am really getting sick of this shit. Communists use this statement to constantly push their agenda as to give an excuse that every other state failed because it wasn't "real".
Sorry buddy, it was real, it is real, and always will be real. Socialism is Communism. The same as a Nigger, Negro, Colored Person,Black, African-American, and Person of Colored are all one and the same. To say otherwise is a blatant lie.
>Not Real Communism
I am really getting sick of this shit. Communists use this statement to constantly push their agenda as to give an excuse that every other state failed because it wasn't "real".
Sorry buddy, it was real, it is real, and always will be real. Socialism is Communism. The same as a Nigger, Negro, Colored Person,Black, African-American, and Person of Colored are all one and the same. To say otherwise is a blatant lie.
>>3601
I didn't make this thread to attract raiding leftypol users. I made this thread to attract people who dislike SJWs.
>>3604
Code Brown, everyone! Code Brown! Actually, I forgot what colour was assigned to the "You care too much about X. You are Obsessed!" Shaming Tactic. Does anyone here have the pic with all of them and their colours saved?
>>3602
I think the writers tried to use that episode as a really shit piece of emotional manipulation. You're "Supposed" to feel bad for Pinkie(baldy) and stop criticizing how painfully, livelihood-destroyingly bad a certain pink pony(bald soyboy) is at writing cartoons. I hate how many episodes these incompetent writers have used to pander to Glimmer fans and tell fans of the show how they "Should" feel about this character and that choice and how they "Should" behave.
I didn't make this thread to attract raiding leftypol users. I made this thread to attract people who dislike SJWs.
>>3604
Code Brown, everyone! Code Brown! Actually, I forgot what colour was assigned to the "You care too much about X. You are Obsessed!" Shaming Tactic. Does anyone here have the pic with all of them and their colours saved?
>>3602
I think the writers tried to use that episode as a really shit piece of emotional manipulation. You're "Supposed" to feel bad for Pinkie(baldy) and stop criticizing how painfully, livelihood-destroyingly bad a certain pink pony(bald soyboy) is at writing cartoons. I hate how many episodes these incompetent writers have used to pander to Glimmer fans and tell fans of the show how they "Should" feel about this character and that choice and how they "Should" behave.
>>3604
This. I hate Glimmer too but you're clearly just projecting everything you hate onto Glimmer and those who like her - to the point you unironically think everyone shaming you has to be a glimmerfag, a liberal, and an SJW.
This. I hate Glimmer too but you're clearly just projecting everything you hate onto Glimmer and those who like her - to the point you unironically think everyone shaming you has to be a glimmerfag, a liberal, and an SJW.
>>3606
It must be a (((coincidence))) that the loudmouthed wannabe-commissar telling everyone to stop talking to the one he keeps labelling as a "racist sexist rapist woman-abusing vampire thoughtcriminal" is also a commie and rabid Glimmer fanboy.
Yep. It must be a (((coincidence))), eh?
They lie so clumsily.
It must be a (((coincidence))) that the loudmouthed wannabe-commissar telling everyone to stop talking to the one he keeps labelling as a "racist sexist rapist woman-abusing vampire thoughtcriminal" is also a commie and rabid Glimmer fanboy.
Yep. It must be a (((coincidence))), eh?
They lie so clumsily.
>>3609
See this is exactly what we're talking about. I'm the only one who brought up racism and he's clearly not defending communism. He's REBUTTING "not true communism" statements. And again with projecting glimmer onto everything. Is she like a hate-tulpa or something for you?
See this is exactly what we're talking about. I'm the only one who brought up racism and he's clearly not defending communism. He's REBUTTING "not true communism" statements. And again with projecting glimmer onto everything. Is she like a hate-tulpa or something for you?
>>3606
Yes, your straw-man of your opposition tends to do what you want it to do.
Here in reality you could be arguing against their leftist socialism that fails to survive even basic power distribution principles.
This is the part where people say,
>almonds activate
>>3608
>>3604
Okay, time for some myth, mythicized stories founded in the legends of old.
One day, HClegend btfo Glimmernigel on Fimfiction.net or wattpad.net (some legends suggest it could've been archiveofourown.net but the interpretation of whether these tales are more legend or story is a topic of debatabe)
-and then he swore vengeance upon the one who slayed his hopes, dreams and family... (believed to actually have been critique of one of his stories,) by attempting to banish them.
The great bard Silver's spell failed but the die was cast, his enemy hex'd into the realm of invocatus block'ohs.
Yes, your straw-man of your opposition tends to do what you want it to do.
Here in reality you could be arguing against their leftist socialism that fails to survive even basic power distribution principles.
This is the part where people say,
>almonds activate
>>3608
>>3604
Okay, time for some myth, mythicized stories founded in the legends of old.
One day, HClegend btfo Glimmernigel on Fimfiction.net or wattpad.net (some legends suggest it could've been archiveofourown.net but the interpretation of whether these tales are more legend or story is a topic of debatabe)
-and then he swore vengeance upon the one who slayed his hopes, dreams and family... (believed to actually have been critique of one of his stories,) by attempting to banish them.
The great bard Silver's spell failed but the die was cast, his enemy hex'd into the realm of invocatus block'ohs.
>>3612
*rolls eyes*
Hclegend, remember that time you harassed me on r/undertale, and then harassed me on r/askoldpeople? Remember how butthurt you got when I made a new blog post on fimfiction explaining why I don't like Starlight Glimmer?
You should have been banned, last time the admins here told you to drop your vendetta against me. Because you never dropped it. I was willing to let the time you and your friends raided this site go, but you are not willing to let the time I disrespected your favourite cartoon horse go. You keep trying to convince people who have no idea who we are that you're worth something and I'm not, because only someone entirely unfamiliar with us could be convinced that this is the case.
You have nothing to offer this site or any discussion on it. You are a plant, here to shitpost and pseud it up about "muh cycles" and mindlessly nay-say at any suggestions and ideas offered to fix the problems facing the west.
Now, getting reminded of that time you were dumb enough to reveal that you were stalking me on reddit and downvoting everything that I posted seems to bother you. So, I will say... Fuck off and take the discord users "Samefagging" for you with you, or I will post an archived link to the r/askoldpeople subreddit post in which you stupidly revealed yourself to everyone present as the world's pettiest stalker.
*rolls eyes*
Hclegend, remember that time you harassed me on r/undertale, and then harassed me on r/askoldpeople? Remember how butthurt you got when I made a new blog post on fimfiction explaining why I don't like Starlight Glimmer?
You should have been banned, last time the admins here told you to drop your vendetta against me. Because you never dropped it. I was willing to let the time you and your friends raided this site go, but you are not willing to let the time I disrespected your favourite cartoon horse go. You keep trying to convince people who have no idea who we are that you're worth something and I'm not, because only someone entirely unfamiliar with us could be convinced that this is the case.
You have nothing to offer this site or any discussion on it. You are a plant, here to shitpost and pseud it up about "muh cycles" and mindlessly nay-say at any suggestions and ideas offered to fix the problems facing the west.
Now, getting reminded of that time you were dumb enough to reveal that you were stalking me on reddit and downvoting everything that I posted seems to bother you. So, I will say... Fuck off and take the discord users "Samefagging" for you with you, or I will post an archived link to the r/askoldpeople subreddit post in which you stupidly revealed yourself to everyone present as the world's pettiest stalker.
>>3612
Straw-man: Over Exaggeration of your political opponents argument.
>Real Communism has never at any point been achieved in the real world because it's fundamentally at odds with human nature, the closest anyone has ever come to implementing it is Socialism...
Socialism is Communism is my argument. They are one and the same and has been used from Soviet Union to Cuba.
A rose by any other name is still a rose. That is the point I made with the term Nigger. When it was socially acceptable to call someone by that name and then we changed it to meet the new social standards.
Socialism is just a new term for communism. The fact the term changed doesn't excuse the fact of what it is and modern leftist use it as to excuse the failures of why it failed to claim it wasn't "real" communism as >>3563 made the same exact argument.
It doesn't matter how it was organized as a government from all the countries that implemented it, they all follow the same ideologies and system based on Karl Marx.
Straw-man: Over Exaggeration of your political opponents argument.
>Real Communism has never at any point been achieved in the real world because it's fundamentally at odds with human nature, the closest anyone has ever come to implementing it is Socialism...
Socialism is Communism is my argument. They are one and the same and has been used from Soviet Union to Cuba.
A rose by any other name is still a rose. That is the point I made with the term Nigger. When it was socially acceptable to call someone by that name and then we changed it to meet the new social standards.
Socialism is just a new term for communism. The fact the term changed doesn't excuse the fact of what it is and modern leftist use it as to excuse the failures of why it failed to claim it wasn't "real" communism as >>3563 made the same exact argument.
It doesn't matter how it was organized as a government from all the countries that implemented it, they all follow the same ideologies and system based on Karl Marx.
>>3614
There's nothing the audience loves to see more than a percieved cop out like,
>but dey're day same gosh darn fangled thang
this kind of inability to counter semantic arguments is exactly the kind of thing that gives me the political edge I need to debate left-wingers.
No wonder why you're over here shielding Silver.
Oh and do you want to join the sargon discord to help me btfo sjaydoubleyas?
because when you talk this
and seperate ideas like this
Do you want to know how i know you're new to the whole forum-posting thing?
There's nothing the audience loves to see more than a percieved cop out like,
>but dey're day same gosh darn fangled thang
this kind of inability to counter semantic arguments is exactly the kind of thing that gives me the political edge I need to debate left-wingers.
No wonder why you're over here shielding Silver.
Oh and do you want to join the sargon discord to help me btfo sjaydoubleyas?
because when you talk this
and seperate ideas like this
Do you want to know how i know you're new to the whole forum-posting thing?
>>3613
>So, I will say… Fuck off and take the discord users "Samefagging" for you with you
>samefagging
>on discord
>multiple people samefagging
what drugs are you on?
>So, I will say… Fuck off and take the discord users "Samefagging" for you with you
>samefagging
>on discord
>multiple people samefagging
what drugs are you on?
>>3615
Huh? I think you are replying to the wrong guy. Did you get the ID's wrong and or hit the wrong post number? Not that it is any relevant but I am Far-Right when it comes to politics and much of a conservative. I don't know who the hell Silver is, is someone namefagging that I am not aware of? And then the rest really is gibberish. I am sorry but you aren't making sense other than personal attacks.
Also try to move your window to snap on either the left or the right of the screen and then you will see those ideas actually form what are called "paragraphs". Paragraphs are meant to divide ideas into groups on a page to make it easier for the reader to understand and each usually has a opening and closing sentence that encapsulates that idea and transitions to the next.
You pointed out a logical fallacy towards me when what I stated wasn't and exaggeration as I directly quoted him. So now I will point an actual fallacy. Ad Hominum, a direct personal attack against an opponents character.
Huh? I think you are replying to the wrong guy. Did you get the ID's wrong and or hit the wrong post number? Not that it is any relevant but I am Far-Right when it comes to politics and much of a conservative. I don't know who the hell Silver is, is someone namefagging that I am not aware of? And then the rest really is gibberish. I am sorry but you aren't making sense other than personal attacks.
Also try to move your window to snap on either the left or the right of the screen and then you will see those ideas actually form what are called "paragraphs". Paragraphs are meant to divide ideas into groups on a page to make it easier for the reader to understand and each usually has a opening and closing sentence that encapsulates that idea and transitions to the next.
You pointed out a logical fallacy towards me when what I stated wasn't and exaggeration as I directly quoted him. So now I will point an actual fallacy. Ad Hominum, a direct personal attack against an opponents character.
>>3606
>I cannot tell the difference between communism and socialism.
They're both shit, but as I said, communism is fundamentally impossible because we don't have the mentality of ants.
>I cannot tell the difference between communism and socialism.
They're both shit, but as I said, communism is fundamentally impossible because we don't have the mentality of ants.
>>3618
>Governance vs Economy.
Karl Marx stated, "workers of the world unite." and that "the people shall own the means of production". Just like how Korea calls them democratic, doesn't mean that they are still not Communist or follow Marxism. The difference you try to point out is state power, not economic power.
It is shit for many reasons, from the state becoming aristrocrats (which marx hatted) to human nature wanting to stab another in the back, even if by doing so they just sit back and get their kicks on a free ride. It can never sustain itself economically. Be it the people redistributing wealth (as you try to argue communism) or the state (socialism). It really has become as divided as an argument of Gender vs Sex when they are too the same thing.
>Governance vs Economy.
Karl Marx stated, "workers of the world unite." and that "the people shall own the means of production". Just like how Korea calls them democratic, doesn't mean that they are still not Communist or follow Marxism. The difference you try to point out is state power, not economic power.
It is shit for many reasons, from the state becoming aristrocrats (which marx hatted) to human nature wanting to stab another in the back, even if by doing so they just sit back and get their kicks on a free ride. It can never sustain itself economically. Be it the people redistributing wealth (as you try to argue communism) or the state (socialism). It really has become as divided as an argument of Gender vs Sex when they are too the same thing.
>>3619
The difference I see is that Socialism retains the presence of government while Communism lacks it completely, which will never work for obvious reasons because people don't like giving up their hard earned shit and can only be coerced to do so. If I recall, there are actually small communist communities in rural Russia still, but they're quickly dying out because no one wants to live under that system and the kids are moving out as soon as they come of age. Don't quote me on that though, I only vaguely remember it being mentioned on /pol/ and I never followed up on it.
The difference I see is that Socialism retains the presence of government while Communism lacks it completely, which will never work for obvious reasons because people don't like giving up their hard earned shit and can only be coerced to do so. If I recall, there are actually small communist communities in rural Russia still, but they're quickly dying out because no one wants to live under that system and the kids are moving out as soon as they come of age. Don't quote me on that though, I only vaguely remember it being mentioned on /pol/ and I never followed up on it.
>>3617
>indentation
>new line no space
>single line break
I think you might be the one who needs to learn what paragraph breaks are, you might even learn some different ways to format those ideas.
>two sentence paragraphs
That's enough kool-aid for today.
You shouldn't worry so much about '''paragraphs''' and stick to the 'readability' goal.
>gibberish
Get the dick out of your brain, the only gibberish is your inability to follow a chain of events, this entire thread was about Silver, keep up.
I never implied you straw-manned the discount-kiwi.
That's not the who I meant, thanks, maybe not enough of us have snapped our screens to the right or left to get on your level and understand you.
What are you even trying to point out? Socialism is a new term for communism?
If you mean to say that how it's used in contemporary politics by leftists (incorrectly) as an interchangeable word for communism then I might be able to compromise with you and agree.
I can't even parse the rest of your argument because the rest of it looks like you're trying to validate your semantics to other people.
None of anything you say has use to me, the only part that's useful is 'nob an argumend' so I don't see why you want to argue it so hard as to run it against other peoples points. This is the kind of thing that's only useful to point out during the course of an argument for the benefit of everyone being on the same page.
>You pointed out a logical fallacy towards me when what I stated wasn't and exaggeration as I directly quoted him. So now I will point an actual fallacy. Ad Hominum, a direct personal attack against an opponents character.
Thanks dude, sorry I insulted you, that was, as I understand, uncalled for, I apologize. I (personally lol) sure hate those fucking fallacies.
Add my account u/Hclegend and we can, maybe, swap thesis papers later.
>indentation
>new line no space
>single line break
I think you might be the one who needs to learn what paragraph breaks are, you might even learn some different ways to format those ideas.
>two sentence paragraphs
That's enough kool-aid for today.
You shouldn't worry so much about '''paragraphs''' and stick to the 'readability' goal.
>gibberish
Get the dick out of your brain, the only gibberish is your inability to follow a chain of events, this entire thread was about Silver, keep up.
I never implied you straw-manned the discount-kiwi.
That's not the who I meant, thanks, maybe not enough of us have snapped our screens to the right or left to get on your level and understand you.
What are you even trying to point out? Socialism is a new term for communism?
If you mean to say that how it's used in contemporary politics by leftists (incorrectly) as an interchangeable word for communism then I might be able to compromise with you and agree.
I can't even parse the rest of your argument because the rest of it looks like you're trying to validate your semantics to other people.
None of anything you say has use to me, the only part that's useful is 'nob an argumend' so I don't see why you want to argue it so hard as to run it against other peoples points. This is the kind of thing that's only useful to point out during the course of an argument for the benefit of everyone being on the same page.
>You pointed out a logical fallacy towards me when what I stated wasn't and exaggeration as I directly quoted him. So now I will point an actual fallacy. Ad Hominum, a direct personal attack against an opponents character.
Thanks dude, sorry I insulted you, that was, as I understand, uncalled for, I apologize. I (personally lol) sure hate those fucking fallacies.
Add my account u/Hclegend and we can, maybe, swap thesis papers later.
>>3620
Not to sound like an ancap but by definition the state is the institution that uses force or the threat thereof to maintain itself and the territory it governs. I can't think of any non-government that follows communism or socialism. The closest I can even get is communalism, wherein West African niggers can demand someone to share any amount of anything for any reason, and if that person says no they're to be robbed of it. It's still a state by the aforementioned definition but it's a situation where civilians can commit violence without consequence.
Not to sound like an ancap but by definition the state is the institution that uses force or the threat thereof to maintain itself and the territory it governs. I can't think of any non-government that follows communism or socialism. The closest I can even get is communalism, wherein West African niggers can demand someone to share any amount of anything for any reason, and if that person says no they're to be robbed of it. It's still a state by the aforementioned definition but it's a situation where civilians can commit violence without consequence.
>>3622
It wasn't always when there were still places to go that were ungoverned for people who didn't want to live under the iron fist of the government, the Earth is 'full' now. Also >ancal, I'm gonna start calling Californians this.
It wasn't always when there were still places to go that were ungoverned for people who didn't want to live under the iron fist of the government, the Earth is 'full' now. Also >ancal, I'm gonna start calling Californians this.
File (): 6B69DD0DAB6B89FAAB4B833ABCD7CD06-847291.png (827.4 KB, 1024x1439, Neptune_(Hyperdimension_Neptunia).png)
>ancaps
An American town once tried Ancap ideology.
Ancap ideology is supposed to work on a smaller scale, but in the case of the town they literally wanted to remove them-self from the actual state systems the town had operated with for ages.
I wouldn't want to live in under an ideological system.
But if you want to talk politics like a faggot you'll have to go to >>>/sp/ because this is thread derailment and the thread is about Fimfiction and Glimmernigel.
Now, Glimmernigel, what was that about posting an archived link? You wanna go there?
What about the proof linking ''me'' to a glimmer shitpost raid? Don't you have fallout 4 mods to make??
An American town once tried Ancap ideology.
Ancap ideology is supposed to work on a smaller scale, but in the case of the town they literally wanted to remove them-self from the actual state systems the town had operated with for ages.
I wouldn't want to live in under an ideological system.
But if you want to talk politics like a faggot you'll have to go to >>>/sp/ because this is thread derailment and the thread is about Fimfiction and Glimmernigel.
Now, Glimmernigel, what was that about posting an archived link? You wanna go there?
What about the proof linking ''me'' to a glimmer shitpost raid? Don't you have fallout 4 mods to make??
>>3625
I understand changing to or creating a new thread but moving to /sp/ to talk politics? Seems odd.
I will stop though.
I understand changing to or creating a new thread but moving to /sp/ to talk politics? Seems odd.
I will stop though.
File (): 0B05103D47D8DC51A2F9F31F10427573-7328.png (7.2 KB, 310x345, Screenshot-2018-8-21 Glimposting .png)
>>3594
I'm glad you appreciate my suggestions, and I legitimately hope that you improve. On the other hand, >pic related https://mlpol.net/qa/res/2631.html should give you an adequate idea of how long I've been trying to get through to you. I accede that I have been insufferable at times, and admit that my receptivity to your material and presentation directly correlates to your receptivity to mine. One of Jordan Peterson's 'rules' is "Assume the person talking to you has something important to teach" (paraphrased). When you adopt this attitude, I have no issue with you, but when you act like a prick,... well likewise.
If you think this is bad, you should see my (you)'s in the Rick and Morty thread
I'm taking the opportunity to emphasize this because I rather enjoyed the last couple days, but then I spend just one day away from the board, and you're off to the races again. Do you really not see how sperging out and baselessly accusing people of shit because they're not responding how you think they should is counter-productive?
>>3607
No, but you did make this thread to attract attention. Guess what? You got it, and everything that comes with it. What makes me sad is that you don't realize you're shooting yourself in the foot, and so you keep doing it. I reiterate, everyone is an asshole and it would do you a service to realize it.
I'm glad you appreciate my suggestions, and I legitimately hope that you improve. On the other hand, >pic related https://mlpol.net/qa/res/2631.html should give you an adequate idea of how long I've been trying to get through to you. I accede that I have been insufferable at times, and admit that my receptivity to your material and presentation directly correlates to your receptivity to mine. One of Jordan Peterson's 'rules' is "Assume the person talking to you has something important to teach" (paraphrased). When you adopt this attitude, I have no issue with you, but when you act like a prick,... well likewise.
If you think this is bad, you should see my (you)'s in the Rick and Morty thread
I'm taking the opportunity to emphasize this because I rather enjoyed the last couple days, but then I spend just one day away from the board, and you're off to the races again. Do you really not see how sperging out and baselessly accusing people of shit because they're not responding how you think they should is counter-productive?
>>3607
No, but you did make this thread to attract attention. Guess what? You got it, and everything that comes with it. What makes me sad is that you don't realize you're shooting yourself in the foot, and so you keep doing it. I reiterate, everyone is an asshole and it would do you a service to realize it.
>>3628
I would really prefer that you stop being disingenuous.
The criers in this thread don't really have a right to play the victim if I have to openly say "I'll only listen to what you have to say if it's worth something" to get them to either say something worth something or have meltdowns due to their inability to do so.
When someone in this thread gave me feedback, I responded well to it, while ignoring the worthless Leddit "bawww is so cwingey! I identify u as a spergistic and so do my friends!" mouth confusion.
I would really prefer that you stop being disingenuous.
The criers in this thread don't really have a right to play the victim if I have to openly say "I'll only listen to what you have to say if it's worth something" to get them to either say something worth something or have meltdowns due to their inability to do so.
When someone in this thread gave me feedback, I responded well to it, while ignoring the worthless Leddit "bawww is so cwingey! I identify u as a spergistic and so do my friends!" mouth confusion.
File (): 504530E1C09763E5560E57D2F20C3A71-650500.gif (635.3 KB, 800x450, 1529099599153895429.gif)
>Reddick calling others Reddick
>>3621
I don't mind having discussion and perhaps I do have some issues in articulating my exact point at times. Though it would be better to ask to clarify than to demean your opponent. So thank you for understanding that.
I don't know exactly what term came first, communism or socialism, if I recall correctly Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto was inspired by Utopia which coined Socialism, but don't take my word on that I am not 100% on it. However, in these days both point back at Karl Marx as both still use his book as doctrine. The term, at least in modern times, have always been synonymous with another albeit some differences, though arguing them would be like comparing apples to apples, seriously! Take the sweet apple Honey Crisp and compare it to a very tart Granny Smith. Both very different but the same as they are both apples. Comparison can even be made with Baptist vs Catholic, vastly difference but follow one doctrine, the Bible. I think of Communism as the all encapsuling body of the ideology since that is the word used in the Manifesto. But like taboo words of yesteryear, eg. Nigger. Socialism has replaced it to make it more appealing.
The point I was trying to get across is due to the synonymous nature of the words Communism and Socialism, in that they follow the same doctrine, many who support communism will state that it was never "truly" practiced and defend it as being "pure" while making the claim that all other countries, Cuba, Soviet Union, N. Korea, etc., were merely posers. In turn they confirm "Well, because it was never really practiced you can't take this as an example why it failed and communism can still work if it were really practiced." It is why when I saw the same argument it was, worrysome, to say the least.
Oh, and by the way, I never paid attention to the "artists" name. I just saw hubris.
I don't mind having discussion and perhaps I do have some issues in articulating my exact point at times. Though it would be better to ask to clarify than to demean your opponent. So thank you for understanding that.
I don't know exactly what term came first, communism or socialism, if I recall correctly Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto was inspired by Utopia which coined Socialism, but don't take my word on that I am not 100% on it. However, in these days both point back at Karl Marx as both still use his book as doctrine. The term, at least in modern times, have always been synonymous with another albeit some differences, though arguing them would be like comparing apples to apples, seriously! Take the sweet apple Honey Crisp and compare it to a very tart Granny Smith. Both very different but the same as they are both apples. Comparison can even be made with Baptist vs Catholic, vastly difference but follow one doctrine, the Bible. I think of Communism as the all encapsuling body of the ideology since that is the word used in the Manifesto. But like taboo words of yesteryear, eg. Nigger. Socialism has replaced it to make it more appealing.
The point I was trying to get across is due to the synonymous nature of the words Communism and Socialism, in that they follow the same doctrine, many who support communism will state that it was never "truly" practiced and defend it as being "pure" while making the claim that all other countries, Cuba, Soviet Union, N. Korea, etc., were merely posers. In turn they confirm "Well, because it was never really practiced you can't take this as an example why it failed and communism can still work if it were really practiced." It is why when I saw the same argument it was, worrysome, to say the least.
Oh, and by the way, I never paid attention to the "artists" name. I just saw hubris.
>>3592
>complains about people wasting time on internet drama instead of focusing on super srs stuff
>starts two threads about his pony fanfiction
Nigel, I'm almost hesitant to poke this particular bear any further, but frankly the level of disconnection from reality you've exhibited in this thread is literally CWC tier. As far as I've been able to discern, your honest to God interpretation of what's going on here is that some guy who once made fun of you on FiMfiction followed you to /mlpol/, took the time to establish an identity as Vril anon, brought along an entire army of doppelganger shitposters to "samefag," all with the apparent intention of sabotaging the community's opinion of some cringy fanfiction you wrote. And the Glimmerniggers! Oh God, the Glimmerniggers, they're everywhere! Your narcissistic, ridiculous assumption that there is some secret army of Starlight Glimmer fans hiding in the shadows on this site, just waiting to shit on your work, not because it's bad, but simply because you made fun of their favorite pony, is so over the top autistic it defies categorization. Like I'm pretty sure doctors are going to have to create a whole new spectrum just so they have somewhere to classify your autism.
For your own good, let me make just one (probably futile) effort to explain in plain English what is actually happening here. You started two, not one but two, threads to fish for compliments on your horrendous, amateurishly-written fanfiction about your God-awful Mary Sue OC BTFOing an imaginary pony you hate in an imaginary debate in which you control the actions of all characters, thus rendering the argument completely pointless and an absolute bore to read. Unsurprisngly, no one was even remotely interested. You were told to fuck off. Instead of taking the hint, you kept arguing with people, reverting to your usual rants about Glimmer and calling everyone Commissars or whatever the living fuck. People are now shitting all over your threads and making fun of you because you keep taking the bait and it's hilarious. That is literally the extent of what's going on here.
>What is a lolcow? A "cow" that you "milk" "lols" from.
Once again displaying the traits of your Rainman-tier autism, you have demonstrated that you understand the meaning of words but fail to grasp the inherent concept behind them. A "lolcow" is someone that continuously dispenses lols. No matter how many times you bait them, they always respond predictably with over the top reactions that can be milked for lols. They never learn lessons. They just keep repeating the same behavior that made them a target in the first place, getting the same kind of shit for it, and responding with the same over the top levels of rage and indignation. As an example I invite you to reread your own posts in this thread.
>Starlight Glimmer
I just want to say once more for emphasis that your fixation on this character is both hilarious and unsettling. I'm not a fan of her either, but I can't even imagine getting this triggered by a fucking cartoon pony. It's honestly like that South Park episode where Al Gore is going around trying to convince everyone that Manbearpig is a serious threat. Please, for your own good, get this through your head: there are no Glimmerniggers. There never were any Glimmerniggers. I have been here as long as you have, and I can tell you that this board's opinion of Glimmer overall trends negative, and basically runs the gamut from "meh, she's okay" to "I don't much care for her." People only post her excessively when they want to troll you. I suggest you do some more reading on lolcows.
Please Nigel, for your own good: let it go. Stop responding to bait, stop making threads to shill your writing projects, stop sperging about Glimmer. Please. You really don't want to go down this road.
>complains about people wasting time on internet drama instead of focusing on super srs stuff
>starts two threads about his pony fanfiction
Nigel, I'm almost hesitant to poke this particular bear any further, but frankly the level of disconnection from reality you've exhibited in this thread is literally CWC tier. As far as I've been able to discern, your honest to God interpretation of what's going on here is that some guy who once made fun of you on FiMfiction followed you to /mlpol/, took the time to establish an identity as Vril anon, brought along an entire army of doppelganger shitposters to "samefag," all with the apparent intention of sabotaging the community's opinion of some cringy fanfiction you wrote. And the Glimmerniggers! Oh God, the Glimmerniggers, they're everywhere! Your narcissistic, ridiculous assumption that there is some secret army of Starlight Glimmer fans hiding in the shadows on this site, just waiting to shit on your work, not because it's bad, but simply because you made fun of their favorite pony, is so over the top autistic it defies categorization. Like I'm pretty sure doctors are going to have to create a whole new spectrum just so they have somewhere to classify your autism.
For your own good, let me make just one (probably futile) effort to explain in plain English what is actually happening here. You started two, not one but two, threads to fish for compliments on your horrendous, amateurishly-written fanfiction about your God-awful Mary Sue OC BTFOing an imaginary pony you hate in an imaginary debate in which you control the actions of all characters, thus rendering the argument completely pointless and an absolute bore to read. Unsurprisngly, no one was even remotely interested. You were told to fuck off. Instead of taking the hint, you kept arguing with people, reverting to your usual rants about Glimmer and calling everyone Commissars or whatever the living fuck. People are now shitting all over your threads and making fun of you because you keep taking the bait and it's hilarious. That is literally the extent of what's going on here.
>What is a lolcow? A "cow" that you "milk" "lols" from.
Once again displaying the traits of your Rainman-tier autism, you have demonstrated that you understand the meaning of words but fail to grasp the inherent concept behind them. A "lolcow" is someone that continuously dispenses lols. No matter how many times you bait them, they always respond predictably with over the top reactions that can be milked for lols. They never learn lessons. They just keep repeating the same behavior that made them a target in the first place, getting the same kind of shit for it, and responding with the same over the top levels of rage and indignation. As an example I invite you to reread your own posts in this thread.
>Starlight Glimmer
I just want to say once more for emphasis that your fixation on this character is both hilarious and unsettling. I'm not a fan of her either, but I can't even imagine getting this triggered by a fucking cartoon pony. It's honestly like that South Park episode where Al Gore is going around trying to convince everyone that Manbearpig is a serious threat. Please, for your own good, get this through your head: there are no Glimmerniggers. There never were any Glimmerniggers. I have been here as long as you have, and I can tell you that this board's opinion of Glimmer overall trends negative, and basically runs the gamut from "meh, she's okay" to "I don't much care for her." People only post her excessively when they want to troll you. I suggest you do some more reading on lolcows.
Please Nigel, for your own good: let it go. Stop responding to bait, stop making threads to shill your writing projects, stop sperging about Glimmer. Please. You really don't want to go down this road.
>>3620
As I mentioned here, >>3631 I am not 100% where the term was first coined, however the ideology and the word in itself both point back to Karl Marx. From there, it spun into all sorts of different methods of trying to enact it. One reason it is important to define your terms is because semantics is always a thing.
It is an interesting perspective of how you look at it in that light with the governments role in trying to enact Karl Marx's ideology. Though equally funny in he context there of, with out government it is anarchy and mob rule. Besides, who is going to give up their shit and enforce that others do to "share the wealth" so you have to have some governance. And this is why seeing your definition makes me laugh even louder as communism will never work and always will be "socialism". Just one more feather in the communism always fails cap.
As I mentioned here, >>3631 I am not 100% where the term was first coined, however the ideology and the word in itself both point back to Karl Marx. From there, it spun into all sorts of different methods of trying to enact it. One reason it is important to define your terms is because semantics is always a thing.
It is an interesting perspective of how you look at it in that light with the governments role in trying to enact Karl Marx's ideology. Though equally funny in he context there of, with out government it is anarchy and mob rule. Besides, who is going to give up their shit and enforce that others do to "share the wealth" so you have to have some governance. And this is why seeing your definition makes me laugh even louder as communism will never work and always will be "socialism". Just one more feather in the communism always fails cap.
>>3633
Like all ideologues, Marx was an idiot who thought he could make literally every single person believe the same thing and act the same way and ironically to never ever question it. Which is why Communism will never work and never has before or never will happen, which was my point, Communism as he outlined it is literally impossible, and what people call Communism is just Socialism, which, being based on Communism, makes it only marginally more possible because it's easier for a government to coerce the population into it. I feel like you've taken what I said and somehow thought I was in favour of it and not just saying it's never actually happened because it's a simple objective fact that it hasn't.
Like all ideologues, Marx was an idiot who thought he could make literally every single person believe the same thing and act the same way and ironically to never ever question it. Which is why Communism will never work and never has before or never will happen, which was my point, Communism as he outlined it is literally impossible, and what people call Communism is just Socialism, which, being based on Communism, makes it only marginally more possible because it's easier for a government to coerce the population into it. I feel like you've taken what I said and somehow thought I was in favour of it and not just saying it's never actually happened because it's a simple objective fact that it hasn't.
>>3632
When will you wannabe-Commissars notice that I just stop reading your posts when you mention CWC for the same reason I stop reading Liberal posts when they say Trump is Russian? I have done nothing wrong, unless pissing off the Glimmy Brigade and making them hate me more than they did last time I ruined their raid on this site counts.
You have to keep mentioning Russia- I mean Hitler- I mean CWC to try and form a connection between me and this guy. Because a connection just isn't there. You have to keep labelling me with these bad words like Racist and Sexist- I mean Egotistical and Vampiric because at the end of the day, you're still crying libtards who want criticism of your ideas and heroes censored.
I know CWC is supposedly one of the few people on the planet arguably more delusional and entitled than you, but there are pedophiles and rapists who get away with it. The people who destroyed the family got away with it. Uncontrolled immigration is still happening. And what are you doing with your free time? Acting like this is just another subreddit for cringers, scraping the bottom of the barrel to find losers to cringe at, even though they'd find the ultimate cringe if they looked in a mirror.
Yeah, the future of the western world is in SUCH good hands. That is what we're here to discuss, when not posting porn and greentext and masturbating together to keep Reddit out, yes?
When will you wannabe-Commissars notice that I just stop reading your posts when you mention CWC for the same reason I stop reading Liberal posts when they say Trump is Russian? I have done nothing wrong, unless pissing off the Glimmy Brigade and making them hate me more than they did last time I ruined their raid on this site counts.
You have to keep mentioning Russia- I mean Hitler- I mean CWC to try and form a connection between me and this guy. Because a connection just isn't there. You have to keep labelling me with these bad words like Racist and Sexist- I mean Egotistical and Vampiric because at the end of the day, you're still crying libtards who want criticism of your ideas and heroes censored.
I know CWC is supposedly one of the few people on the planet arguably more delusional and entitled than you, but there are pedophiles and rapists who get away with it. The people who destroyed the family got away with it. Uncontrolled immigration is still happening. And what are you doing with your free time? Acting like this is just another subreddit for cringers, scraping the bottom of the barrel to find losers to cringe at, even though they'd find the ultimate cringe if they looked in a mirror.
Yeah, the future of the western world is in SUCH good hands. That is what we're here to discuss, when not posting porn and greentext and masturbating together to keep Reddit out, yes?
>>3634
No, I didn't think that you were in support of it. Just dangerous thinking as it is the same sort of an argument that the left make."Because they aren't the same words, they aren't the same."
However you definded it now as how you see it diffrently and why. Socialism is diffrent that how the left define it, same as communism.
Something you stated, I dont know why, but when you said about all acting the same and thinking the same reminded me of this one movie or show I watched as a kid. Something about a cd or game that waz mind controling all the kids and the next day at school everyone is wearing all blue like some cult. I am beginning to think that it might have been something from Disney. But yeah, communism isn't too far off from being a cult.
No, I didn't think that you were in support of it. Just dangerous thinking as it is the same sort of an argument that the left make."Because they aren't the same words, they aren't the same."
However you definded it now as how you see it diffrently and why. Socialism is diffrent that how the left define it, same as communism.
Something you stated, I dont know why, but when you said about all acting the same and thinking the same reminded me of this one movie or show I watched as a kid. Something about a cd or game that waz mind controling all the kids and the next day at school everyone is wearing all blue like some cult. I am beginning to think that it might have been something from Disney. But yeah, communism isn't too far off from being a cult.
>>3635
>racist and sexi- I mean egotistical and vampiric
Again you're pretending that being up your own ass and begging for validation are just buzzwords, even when it's laid out in front of you. The fact you're trying so hard to draw the most tenuous parallels to SJWs when according to you we're all communiat glimmerniggers who hate the right is absurd. Give us one singular piece of evidence that anyone here is an anti-white SJW and maybe I'll consider you worth listening to.
>racist and sexi- I mean egotistical and vampiric
Again you're pretending that being up your own ass and begging for validation are just buzzwords, even when it's laid out in front of you. The fact you're trying so hard to draw the most tenuous parallels to SJWs when according to you we're all communiat glimmerniggers who hate the right is absurd. Give us one singular piece of evidence that anyone here is an anti-white SJW and maybe I'll consider you worth listening to.
File (): EBCA1214405449D2C60B073D2E84A925-49968.jpg (48.8 KB, 510x546, 1504180616375-1.jpg)
>>3635
>done nothing wrong
As far as site rules are concerned, technically this is correct (though, one could make an argument that the repeat threads about your fics could constitute shilling to a certain degree).
However, your ostentatious dismissal of proprietary norms on imageboards (read: your lolcow behavior) is an affront to many, who have been here contributing and participating while you have been off writing your fics to later excessively (as in, beyond necessity, reasonability, or mutual respect for anons) promote to an audience that is increasingly dismissive and uninterested. Simply, the more you try and push your fics, the more you will be pushed back against, with emphasis on the fact that you pushed first.
>inb4 I don't respect them
Its evident, and the backlash you're receiving is a consequence - and not an isolated aspect - of that lack of respect.
Nigel, you were doing so well
>done nothing wrong
As far as site rules are concerned, technically this is correct (though, one could make an argument that the repeat threads about your fics could constitute shilling to a certain degree).
However, your ostentatious dismissal of proprietary norms on imageboards (read: your lolcow behavior) is an affront to many, who have been here contributing and participating while you have been off writing your fics to later excessively (as in, beyond necessity, reasonability, or mutual respect for anons) promote to an audience that is increasingly dismissive and uninterested. Simply, the more you try and push your fics, the more you will be pushed back against, with emphasis on the fact that you pushed first.
>inb4 I don't respect them
Its evident, and the backlash you're receiving is a consequence - and not an isolated aspect - of that lack of respect.
Nigel, you were doing so well
>>3638
>You were doing so well
I've yet to see this. From the very first post I saw, he was begging for people to go to fimfiction and give him shill-upvotes to counter dose ebin gommyaniss. When people showed at best a lukewarm response here, he resorted to insulting the entire thread as SJWs. From that point on all he ever does is dig himself deeper in the trench of attempting to draw flimsy comparisons between us and SJWs. No apology, no remorse for shitting up page 1 for over a week, and the one post he seems open to critique is then followed up by "well I don't care what you people think."
He's nothing more than a lolcow who's only fun to mock from another place, where he doesn't outright ruin the board culture by taking time and attention from otherwise regular high-quality posters.
>You were doing so well
I've yet to see this. From the very first post I saw, he was begging for people to go to fimfiction and give him shill-upvotes to counter dose ebin gommyaniss. When people showed at best a lukewarm response here, he resorted to insulting the entire thread as SJWs. From that point on all he ever does is dig himself deeper in the trench of attempting to draw flimsy comparisons between us and SJWs. No apology, no remorse for shitting up page 1 for over a week, and the one post he seems open to critique is then followed up by "well I don't care what you people think."
He's nothing more than a lolcow who's only fun to mock from another place, where he doesn't outright ruin the board culture by taking time and attention from otherwise regular high-quality posters.
File (): A21116B3FC659029665A3EAFDAD6AECA-673286.png (657.5 KB, 1128x764, 10011101000100011110101010001010010011001100.png)
It's been a long time, Jason.
I'll cut right to the chase. I'll tell you why I'm here:
You see, I've had enough. Everyone has had enough. No more. Of (You). And your fanfics. And the autism. No more self-promotion. No more nothing.
I am here to put a stop to it. You see: Your shitposts are my business. And mine to control. NOT YOURS!
Allow me to clue you in on the plan I've had for a while now.
You see, I went out at night into the streets of England. There I found an Internetcafé and contacted every ponysite and politics board I could find. And you know what I did?
I found each and everyone of them. And I told them.
I have your mugshot. If you see this man: Give him nothing. He deserves nothing. You see, I spread these out. They know you, before (You) even approach.
So you see, Jason. I have all the cards. And you are just going to have to play with whatever hand I deal to (You).
I'll cut right to the chase. I'll tell you why I'm here:
You see, I've had enough. Everyone has had enough. No more. Of (You). And your fanfics. And the autism. No more self-promotion. No more nothing.
I am here to put a stop to it. You see: Your shitposts are my business. And mine to control. NOT YOURS!
Allow me to clue you in on the plan I've had for a while now.
You see, I went out at night into the streets of England. There I found an Internetcafé and contacted every ponysite and politics board I could find. And you know what I did?
I found each and everyone of them. And I told them.
I have your mugshot. If you see this man: Give him nothing. He deserves nothing. You see, I spread these out. They know you, before (You) even approach.
So you see, Jason. I have all the cards. And you are just going to have to play with whatever hand I deal to (You).
>>3641
I'm getting an inkling that a lot of bongs do, especially ones who wax e-politics like Sargon. But I would never bring myself to hate all bongs; you were our big brother, and while we're not linked by a government, I still see you as our brother.
I'm getting an inkling that a lot of bongs do, especially ones who wax e-politics like Sargon. But I would never bring myself to hate all bongs; you were our big brother, and while we're not linked by a government, I still see you as our brother.
File (): 6F7CF4FE84E071B8CD346A1EC478A0CB-434100.gif (423.9 KB, 500x363, grinch.gif)
>>3635
>That is what we're here to discuss, when not posting porn and greentext and masturbating together to keep Reddit out, yes?
>posting porn and greentext
>That is what we're here to discuss, when not posting porn and greentext and masturbating together to keep Reddit out, yes?
>posting porn and greentext
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-500] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
500 replies | 226 files | 103 UUIDs | Page 1