>This weekend may set a new record for number of Trump tweets and retweets. Starting with his congratulations on the Senate's passage of Tax Reform, Trump has interacted no less than 17 times with his social platform, although things seemed to accelerate following his Saturday noon tweet in which Trump responded to Flynn's plea agreement in which the president said that "I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI. He has pled guilty to those lies. It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. There was nothing to hide!"
…
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-03/trump-twitter-meltdown-president-goes-war-fbi-urges-suing-abc-bad-reporting
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 93E9E2A8AA9945BBCD5091D3142F0077-200587.png (195.9 KB, 880x622, TrumpVsFBI.png)
File (): 9FE1E344ECE4E33926DB7C4492D21ECD-495314.jpg (483.7 KB, 1024x801, rZm0xRY.jpg)
>>92103
Muahahahahaha
The silver lining is that Clinton never was tried in a court and acquitted so she can't claim Double Jeopardy.
Muahahahahaha
The silver lining is that Clinton never was tried in a court and acquitted so she can't claim Double Jeopardy.
Mueller aide fired for anti-Trump texts now facing review for role in Clinton email probe
>EXCLUSIVE – Two senior Justice Department officials have confirmed to Fox News that the department's Office of Inspector General is reviewing the role played in the Hillary Clinton email investigation by Peter Strzok, a former deputy director for counterintelligence at the FBI who was removed from the staff of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III earlier this year, after Mueller learned that Strzok had exchanged anti-Trump texts with a colleague.
>A source close to the matter said the OIG probe, which will examine Strzok's roles in a number of other politically sensitive cases, should be completed by "very early next year."
>The task will be exceedingly complex, given Strzok's consequential portfolio. He participated in the FBI's fateful interview with Hillary Clinton on July 2, 2016 – just days before then-FBI Director James Comey announced he was declining to recommend prosecution of Mrs. Clinton in connection with her use, as secretary of state, of a private email server.
>As deputy FBI director for counterintelligence, Strzok also enjoyed liaison with various agencies in the intelligence community, including the CIA, then led by Director John Brennan.
…
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/03/mueller-aide-fired-for-anti-trump-texts-now-facing-review-for-role-in-clinton-email-probe.htm.html
Oh no!
>EXCLUSIVE – Two senior Justice Department officials have confirmed to Fox News that the department's Office of Inspector General is reviewing the role played in the Hillary Clinton email investigation by Peter Strzok, a former deputy director for counterintelligence at the FBI who was removed from the staff of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III earlier this year, after Mueller learned that Strzok had exchanged anti-Trump texts with a colleague.
>A source close to the matter said the OIG probe, which will examine Strzok's roles in a number of other politically sensitive cases, should be completed by "very early next year."
>The task will be exceedingly complex, given Strzok's consequential portfolio. He participated in the FBI's fateful interview with Hillary Clinton on July 2, 2016 – just days before then-FBI Director James Comey announced he was declining to recommend prosecution of Mrs. Clinton in connection with her use, as secretary of state, of a private email server.
>As deputy FBI director for counterintelligence, Strzok also enjoyed liaison with various agencies in the intelligence community, including the CIA, then led by Director John Brennan.
…
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/03/mueller-aide-fired-for-anti-trump-texts-now-facing-review-for-role-in-clinton-email-probe.htm.html
Oh no!
>>92105
If it is proved that the FBI threw the Clinton investigation on purpose, will the immunity deals that were struck still stand?
If it is proved that the FBI threw the Clinton investigation on purpose, will the immunity deals that were struck still stand?
File (): EBC7E30CD6F5EB7D5DE1C205AA9C3B52-51594.jpg (50.4 KB, 736x695, nightmare-moon-rarity.jpg)
House Republicans Prepare Contempt Action Against FBI, DOJ
>U.S. House Republicans are drafting a contempt of Congress resolution against Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray, claiming stonewalling in producing material related to the Russia-Trump probes and other matters.
>Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes and other committee Republicans, after considering such action for several weeks, decided to move after media including the New York Times reported Saturday on why a top FBI official assigned to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russia-Trump election collusion had been removed from the investigation.
>Republicans, including the president, pointed to the reports as evidence that the entire probe into Russian meddling has been politically motivated.
>“Now it all starts to make sense,” Trump said on Twitter Sunday.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-03/u-s-house-republicans-prepare-contempt-action-against-fbi-doj-jaqegooo
Oh No! Is it true? Will Trump bait and clean the FBI? >>91904 → >>91923 →
>U.S. House Republicans are drafting a contempt of Congress resolution against Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray, claiming stonewalling in producing material related to the Russia-Trump probes and other matters.
>Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes and other committee Republicans, after considering such action for several weeks, decided to move after media including the New York Times reported Saturday on why a top FBI official assigned to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russia-Trump election collusion had been removed from the investigation.
>Republicans, including the president, pointed to the reports as evidence that the entire probe into Russian meddling has been politically motivated.
>“Now it all starts to make sense,” Trump said on Twitter Sunday.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-03/u-s-house-republicans-prepare-contempt-action-against-fbi-doj-jaqegooo
Oh No! Is it true? Will Trump bait and clean the FBI? >>91904 → >>91923 →
File (): E313DA18D15B640138068967C14D065C-212655.jpg (207.7 KB, 1024x1395, nightmare-rarity-luna.jpg)
New documents reveal FBI's Clinton cover-up
In Washington, the ostensible story is rarely the real story. We know, for example, that former President Clinton engineered a meeting with President Obama’s attorney general, Loretta Lynch, on the tarmac of the Phoenix Airport on June 27, 2016.
That’s the official story, replete with the charming and intentionally disarming detail that all they talked about was their grandchildren. It was just coincidental, don’t you know, that at the time the FBI was looking into Hillary Clinton’s use of a “personal” email server to send, receive and store classified information.
And it was also simply coincidental that just a few days later, the director of the FBI – who served under Attorney General Lynch – announced that he wouldn’t recommend a prosecution of Hillary Clinton.
Richard Nixon must be rolling over in his grave.
What we haven’t known, until now, is that a frantic scramble erupted in the halls of the FBI to cover up this meeting. In fact, the FBI turned its sharp light not on the scandalous meeting between the attorney general and Bill Clinton – but rather on one of the whistleblowers who got the word out.
The organization I head, Judicial Watch, asked the FBI on July 7, 2016, for any records that might pertain to the infamous tarmac meeting. We had to sue after we were ignored by the agency.
Then the FBI told us flat-out that it couldn’t find any records. And we now know that was flat-out untrue. Because, in responding to another one of our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits, the Justice Department gave us heavily redacted documents that showed there were additional documents tucked away at the FBI headquarters.
If not for Judicial Watch's lawsuits these documents would still be hidden today.
Because of the revelation in our other lawsuit, the FBI – without our knowledge—"reopened" our FOIA request. The agency supposedly found about 30 pages of information, which it needed six weeks to review. The FBI finally gave them to us late Thursday.
Now we know why the FBI played shell games. The documents show that FBI officials were concerned solely about the leaking of details of the tarmac meeting. None of the documents show top agency officials cared one whit about the propriety of the meeting itself, but only about who blew the whistle on the covert tête-à-tête.
In one email, an FBI official writes “we need to find that guy.” And in another we learn that the Phoenix FBI office was contacted “in an attempt to stem any further damage.” An FBI official working on Lynch’s security detail even goes so far as to suggest non-disclosure agreements to keep the full facts from coming forth.
No wonder the FBI didn’t turn these documents over until we caught it red-handed, hiding and lying about them.
Simply put, the FBI appears to be fully complicit in a cover-up that attempted to influence a presidential election for a favored candidate – Hillary Clinton. And the truth was trampled on a Phoenix tarmac.
Tom Fitton is president of Judicial Watch. Founded in 1994, Judicial Watch Inc. is a constitutionally conservative, nonpartisan educational foundation that promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.
https://archive.fo/6L17q - Fox News (via Awoo)
In Washington, the ostensible story is rarely the real story. We know, for example, that former President Clinton engineered a meeting with President Obama’s attorney general, Loretta Lynch, on the tarmac of the Phoenix Airport on June 27, 2016.
That’s the official story, replete with the charming and intentionally disarming detail that all they talked about was their grandchildren. It was just coincidental, don’t you know, that at the time the FBI was looking into Hillary Clinton’s use of a “personal” email server to send, receive and store classified information.
And it was also simply coincidental that just a few days later, the director of the FBI – who served under Attorney General Lynch – announced that he wouldn’t recommend a prosecution of Hillary Clinton.
Richard Nixon must be rolling over in his grave.
What we haven’t known, until now, is that a frantic scramble erupted in the halls of the FBI to cover up this meeting. In fact, the FBI turned its sharp light not on the scandalous meeting between the attorney general and Bill Clinton – but rather on one of the whistleblowers who got the word out.
The organization I head, Judicial Watch, asked the FBI on July 7, 2016, for any records that might pertain to the infamous tarmac meeting. We had to sue after we were ignored by the agency.
Then the FBI told us flat-out that it couldn’t find any records. And we now know that was flat-out untrue. Because, in responding to another one of our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits, the Justice Department gave us heavily redacted documents that showed there were additional documents tucked away at the FBI headquarters.
If not for Judicial Watch's lawsuits these documents would still be hidden today.
Because of the revelation in our other lawsuit, the FBI – without our knowledge—"reopened" our FOIA request. The agency supposedly found about 30 pages of information, which it needed six weeks to review. The FBI finally gave them to us late Thursday.
Now we know why the FBI played shell games. The documents show that FBI officials were concerned solely about the leaking of details of the tarmac meeting. None of the documents show top agency officials cared one whit about the propriety of the meeting itself, but only about who blew the whistle on the covert tête-à-tête.
In one email, an FBI official writes “we need to find that guy.” And in another we learn that the Phoenix FBI office was contacted “in an attempt to stem any further damage.” An FBI official working on Lynch’s security detail even goes so far as to suggest non-disclosure agreements to keep the full facts from coming forth.
No wonder the FBI didn’t turn these documents over until we caught it red-handed, hiding and lying about them.
Simply put, the FBI appears to be fully complicit in a cover-up that attempted to influence a presidential election for a favored candidate – Hillary Clinton. And the truth was trampled on a Phoenix tarmac.
Tom Fitton is president of Judicial Watch. Founded in 1994, Judicial Watch Inc. is a constitutionally conservative, nonpartisan educational foundation that promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.
https://archive.fo/6L17q - Fox News (via Awoo)
https://unv.is/cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html
FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey description of Clinton
Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.
The drafting process was a team effort, CNN is told, with a handful of people reviewing the language as edits were made, according to another US official familiar with the matter.
[1]
FBI agent removed from Mueller investigation over anti-Trump messages[2]
The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions[3] over why the change was made after receiving documents from the FBI last month, but the identity of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.
FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey description of Clinton
Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.
The drafting process was a team effort, CNN is told, with a handful of people reviewing the language as edits were made, according to another US official familiar with the matter.
[1]
FBI agent removed from Mueller investigation over anti-Trump messages[2]
The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions[3] over why the change was made after receiving documents from the FBI last month, but the identity of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.
>>92497
It's shocking to see what affects a single FBI agent could accomplish. Extreme carelessness is not a crime but gross negligence sure as hell is. How many other FBI agents are fucking with State documents? Furthermore, now that this deceit has been discovered will there be a Hillary Clinton prosecution? What does this mean for Flynn?
It's shocking to see what affects a single FBI agent could accomplish. Extreme carelessness is not a crime but gross negligence sure as hell is. How many other FBI agents are fucking with State documents? Furthermore, now that this deceit has been discovered will there be a Hillary Clinton prosecution? What does this mean for Flynn?
>>92503
Not sure, but I am curious to see how the left will react when they realize there will be no impeachment.
Not sure, but I am curious to see how the left will react when they realize there will be no impeachment.
>>92504
Oh yeah, almost forgot about that. It's cute how desperate they are to slander Trump. An example being that fake news fanfiction with the Russian hookers.
Oh yeah, almost forgot about that. It's cute how desperate they are to slander Trump. An example being that fake news fanfiction with the Russian hookers.
>>92497
This just got even more interesting
http://www.businessinsider.com/peter-strzok-clinton-emails-trump-russia-investigation-mueller-2017-12
Peter Strzok, the second-highest ranking counterintelligence agent at the FBI, was involved at key junctures in the Hillary Clinton email investigation and the Trump-Russia probe.
Strzok was reportedly the official responsible for changing language in former FBI director James Comey's statement describing Clinton's private email server use from "grossly negligent" — which could carry criminal penalties — to "extremely careless."
Strzok was also the FBI agent who officially signed off on the bureau's decision to launch its Russia investigation in July 2016.
Strzok was ousted from special counsel Robert Mueller's team last August after he sent anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, and investigators are now reviewing the texts for any evidence of political bias.
This just got even more interesting
http://www.businessinsider.com/peter-strzok-clinton-emails-trump-russia-investigation-mueller-2017-12
Peter Strzok, the second-highest ranking counterintelligence agent at the FBI, was involved at key junctures in the Hillary Clinton email investigation and the Trump-Russia probe.
Strzok was reportedly the official responsible for changing language in former FBI director James Comey's statement describing Clinton's private email server use from "grossly negligent" — which could carry criminal penalties — to "extremely careless."
Strzok was also the FBI agent who officially signed off on the bureau's decision to launch its Russia investigation in July 2016.
Strzok was ousted from special counsel Robert Mueller's team last August after he sent anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, and investigators are now reviewing the texts for any evidence of political bias.
File (): D6E44152D8860A5923D531E1C12F5710-1246679.gif (1.2 MB, 900x1080, nightmare-rarity-wavy-hair.gif)
Remember to be humble when you win so as to avoid energising the opponents blow back. You want the wheel to turn as slow as possible when your side is on top. If you do want to engage them, do it in a bland facts only way.
An Angry Senator Grassley Lashes Out At FBI, DOJ In Fiery Senate Floor Speech
https://youtu.be/enlTTLOeoyE
https://youtu.be/enlTTLOeoyE
14 replies | 6 files | 1 UUIDs | Archived