/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>91146
>If trump just disappeared tomorrow, our traffic would drop by forty percent.
The unfortunate part about this is that it is a part of the capitalist system. There is a market for feeding people what they want to hear, so companies make a profit playing the spin game.

The more wealth a society has the more entropy it has. Everyone can afford to pull in various directions, take on various causes, and rip everything apart.

The internet has empowered all groups to rip each other apart at low cost.

Entropy.

>>91146
>democracy dies in darkness
good riddance, the founding fathers themselves said democracy is a shit idea. America is a republic and every single suffrage has been unamerican and detrimental

>>91152
A republic still tends to have democracy, but I see your point.
>Only landed voting when?

>>91152
>>91153
Then we can have classes and no trouble will ever occur again.

What if the flaw is in the human and not any system?

>>91153
>>91154
a republic might still have voting but that's not democracy in and of itself, a republic just requires the will of the governed fairly represented in the government, a democracy is where the power of government rests with the citizenry themselves. The US is supposed to be a Constitutional Republic but it's been bastardized into a Democratic Republic by citizens and politicians whom for no clear reason believe it's meant to be a liberal democracy

>>91155
I think success creates wealth that creates freedom that creates the anarchy of individualism that creates destruction and a reset.

What if success is poisonous?

>>91158
too much of anything is bad

>>91146
https://youtu.be/cWptWsSzSh4

>>91159
Centrist!!

>>91158
>What if success is poisonous?
Success is poisonous. Someone becomes successful by providing desired goods and services for society. Success attracts those that want the fruits of such success. Some are fair and provide back, others try to take all they can. When there are too many takers the success begins to erode. From there either competition overtakes and destroys them, or the leeches leave and the providers can become successful again.

>>91160
That is a false allegation. They are clearly a Radical Moderate.

>>91158
Satan will always target the weakest virtue/strongest vice in a society. In hard economic times it will be envy and impassioned desire for change, causing revolutions and wars. In times of prosperity it will be complacence, decadence, and corruption, which eventually rots the society from within.

>>91166
Satan dubs of Truth. Worse, we don't even need Satan, we do it to ourselves.

>>91166
If only someone would tell us how to resist…

>>91150
>Chaosstar
But that's the helm of awe

>>91169
Well that was the point of the Bible no?
To make sure society didn't fall apart thanks to corruption and the bad traits any human can be born with.

>>91168
Humanity needs an omnipotent leader.
God worked for a while, now it might be time for a machine to take on his role.

>>91254
I like the idea. The child of humanity shall guide us. It might be the best and worst of us all in one mind. Maybe a machine will not have entropy in a way. But if man creates a god then expect man to grow jealous.
If you read the manga of Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind Myazaki explores the idea of man becoming so advanced that we create a being to judge us.

Imagine what we might do under the guidance of a supreme being. The stars could be in the palms of our hands.

>>91254
The fairy tale "bible" was created by the single most corrupt humans in existence. Look at every society that adopts it: destroyed from within by the blood-loving murder-cult zealous believers.

>>91279
Because nothing could possibly go wrong by signing over control to an AI? "God from Man" implies that we are capable of making a being more morally perfect than ourselves, which is logically and empirically unfounded. If such a development happens in my lifetime, I will in fact bug out in the wilderness somewhere, not out of distrust of technology but simply because it would cement control over the individual.

>>91299
You are welcome to believe so. However, why would corrupt humans not only illustrate their corruption in the book but also the path by which they arrived there? After all, the Jews in the Old Testament went from being a pious tribe chosen by God to outright betraying Him and becoming power-hungry, idolatrous child-murderers. The New Testament is hardly any more flattering with the Jewish leaders killing their one means of redemption, Who had spoken out against their corruption and preached forgiveness for enemies.

So are you complaining about the Jews or the Christians? If the former, then the Bible condemns their betrayal, and this fact is the foundation for centuries of distrust of Jews by Christians. If the latter, then why have the societies built by Christians been the most successful, prosperous, and free in all of human history?

>>91312
Both.
>successful
During the Dark Ages, all economic self-empowerment was condemned as shameful, evil even. It was typical jewish doublethink: "do as I say and be poor for (((religious sake))) goy, NOT as I do which is to be rich off you and eat like an effendi". Little villages clustered around the decaying ruins of actual civilizations falling apart since no one knows how to repair anything from the past, all the while traitor bandit-kings and their masters in the priesthoods of judeo-christianity hold entire cultures hostage while dining in opulence.
>prosperous
The burning of the Library of Alexandria ring a bell, anon? Didn't think so. The average judeo-christian still looks at technology and science from afar as an idle curiousity, if not outright heresy. The few intellectuals that began the Silver Age of Enlightenment in the 1400's were continually stymied, treated as "heretics", and outright purged until post-French Revolution. Today's judeo-christians remain nearly as superstitious as the kikes themselves.
>free
Sources that do not invoke "religious tolerance" fucking needed.

I'm concered, the few dissenting voices are sniffed out by project veritas and exposed. If anything, it's like they're trying to get dissenters to shut up.

Everything those people say is pretty much common knowledge among crowds like ours, maybe they're trying to get it out there for the normies, but I'm still wary.

>>91428
It's possible that they may be genuinely good people and this may just end up plugging leaks. However, the MSM's reputation must be destroyed and the more this happens the less anyone can put stock in the official narratives parroted around.

Also, if these media corporations purge themselves to make themselves more ideologically pure they will simply make themselves look more ridiculous and will cripple themselves as they'd be nothing more than echo chambers.

>>91312
>a being more morally perfect than ourselves
We don't need moral perfection, we just need a mom to put into words, a being that "loves" humanity no matter what and tries to teach it of important values.
I doubt this will ever be a thing now tho, everyone has their heads up their asses to be a little humble.

> it would cement control over the individual.
Is it really bad?
We are already being constantly controlled silently by ethics, morality, values, fear, rights, laws..
Creating a being to just help out make the right decisions won't be bad if we make it right.
Of course it will eventually stop working so a Killswitch is a need.